• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.87-101
• /
• 2024

As the academic publishing environment evolves rapidly and the open science paradigm emerges, the demand for efficient and transparent peer review is growing. This study outlines efforts to actively introduce advanced concepts in scholarly communication into the submission and review system. AccessON Peer Review Management System Plus (ACOMS+), developed and operated by the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, is an online submission and peer review system that aims for open science. This study provides an overview of ACOMS+ and presents its four main features: open peer review, open access publishing and self-archiving, online quantitative/qualitative evaluation, and peer reviewer invitation. The directions for further developing ACOMS+ to fully support open science are also discussed. ACOMS+ is the first system in Korea to introduce the open peer review process and is distinguished as a system that supports open access publishing and digital transformation of academic journals. Furthermore, ACOMS+ is expected to contribute to the advancement of the academic publishing environment through the increasing shift toward open access publishing, transparent peer review, and open science.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.45-68
• /
• 2021

온라인 리뷰가 소비자 의사결정에 미치는 영향이 증가함에 따라 리뷰조작에 대한 염려도 증가하고 있다. 리뷰조작은 판매량을 증가시키기 위해, 진실 되지 않은 리뷰를 게시하는 것으로 소비자의 역 선택을 초래하며, 사회 전체에 큰 비용으로 작용한다. 선행연구는 대부분 데이터 마이닝 방법을 통해 리뷰조작을 예측하는 데 초점을 맞추었으며, 소비자 관점의 연구는 상대적으로 제한적이다. 그러나 소비자가 지각한 리뷰의 조작 가능성은 리뷰의 유용성에 영향을 미칠 수 있으므로 허위 여부와 상관없이 온라인 구전 관리에 중요한 시사점을 제공할 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구에는 소비자가 조작되었다고 평가한 리뷰와 일반적인 리뷰 간에 어떠한 차이가 있는지 분석하고, 조작된 것으로 평가된 리뷰와 리뷰 유용성 간의 관계를 분석하였다. 실증분석을 위해 LibraryThing 웹사이트의 온라인 도서 리뷰 34,711개를 다수준 로지스틱 회귀분석과 포아송 회귀분석을 활용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 소비자가 조작되었다고 지각하는 리뷰와 그렇지 않은 리뷰 간에는 제품 수준, 리뷰어 수준, 리뷰 수준 요인들에 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 조작된 리뷰는 리뷰 유용성에 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 보험의학회지
• /
• 제28권1_2호
• /
• pp.31-35
• /
• 2009

Background : Many of internists have been working for insurance industry. Insurance medicine is use of medical knowledge for insurance industry. There is social role of insurance medicine in terms of soundness of insurance administration. Recently social role of internists also have been being watched. Although theme of insurance medicine is medical risk selection, insurance claims administration also needs medical experts'opinion. There are not any corroborative study of medical consulting for insurance claims. Among insurance industry, someone called this medical review of insurance claims as 'medical claims review'. Aim : To investigate usefulness of medical review of insurance claims. Design : Questionnaire survey with claim staffs in one of insurance claim adjustment company in Korea. Methods : 265 claim staffs were divided into 4 groups and conducted survey using a questionnaire of 20 questions. Utility score, job satisfaction score, and difficult factors of claims administration were measured. Results : Utility score and job satisfaction score are highest in medical claims review group. The most difficult in claim administration to claim staffs was demonstrated to medical knowledge. Conclusion : Medical review of insurance claims is proved to be worthy. Document-based consulting method, namely medical claims review, is more useful than telephone-based simple query among claim staffs...Subjects of the medical claims review are medical record and it's principle is independent medical examination with evidence-based approach, it also has role of protecting fraud of insurance claims. Two main question types of medical claims review are verification and advice.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.197-205
• /
• 2006

Purpose: The objective of the study is to analyze the review contents of reviewers for the submitted papers in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing in 2003. Method: The review contents of the 165 papers were selected 217 papers that were submitted in 2003. Among those 165 papers, the 21 papers belonged to the 'Do not publish' list and 17 papers, 'Revise manuscript and resubmit', list and the 94 papers, 'Publish if revisions are made' list. There are more than two level differences among the four levels of decision in acceptance of publication in 33 papers. Results: The analysis of the review contents for the papers were suggested according to review categories: introduction, method, results, discussion and conclusion. In addition, if papers had more than two levels of review they were rated poor accord or inconsistent. Conclusion: For the quality of the academic journal and development of the nursing science, it is important to disseminate and publish the research paper. Therefore, review of the submitted paper is also important. Implications for the profitable review were suggested in the study.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.53-69
• /
• 2007

Internet shopping websites have offered comfort to consumers in shopping and built trust relationships with them by providing electronic agents for recommendation, escrow services, and customer centers etc. But as there is little big difference among the shopping websites in terms of technical competence, website design, operational policy, they recognize online feedback (reviews or recommendation of consumers or experts) and online feedback mechanism as important marketing tools. Based on online feedback related studies, this study explores antecedents (consensus, vividness of reviews, interactions in review boards) of the perceived effectiveness of review boards which are text-based feedback mechanisms and its consequences such as trust, satisfaction, and intention to use. The results show that the perceived effectiveness of review boards is significantly affected by vividness of reviews and interactions in review boards, and the impact of interaction in review boards on the perceived effectiveness of review boards is stronger than that of vividness of reviews. The results also show that the perceived effectiveness of review boards has a significant influence on trust and satisfaction with the shopping websites, and intention to use is influenced by both trust and satisfaction.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.203-225
• /
• 2018

Purpose This study investigated the impact of review language style (affective vs. cognitive) on review helpfulness and the moderating effects of the types of attractions in the relationships between the review language and its helpfulness. Design/methodology/approach This study investigates the impact of review language style (affective vs. cognitive) on review helpfulness and the moderating effects of the types of attractions in the relationships between the review language and its helpfulness. This study selected two hedonic and utilitarian attractions (Hedonic: Brandenburg Gate, Utilitarian: Peragamon Museum) located in Berlin. A total of 3,320 reviews was collected from TripAdvisor. We divided online reviews posted for these places into reviews with more affective language and with more cognitive language by using the LIWC. Then, we investigated the impact of language effect on review helpfulness across the attraction type. Findings The findings suggest that peers tend to judge more helpful toward cognitive language in attraction reviews regardless of attraction type. This study found that peers tend to perceive more helpful toward cognitive review in utilitarian attractions. Even though there was an interaction effect between review language and attraction type, in hedonic attractions, the influence of cognitive language was reduced, but still cognitive reviews would get more helpful votes.

• 동서간호학연구지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.153-165
• /
• 2021

Purpose: The aim of study was to identify ranges of Korean nurses' competency in disaster nursing. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The review used information from four databases: RISS, ScienceON, EBSCO Discovery Service, and CINAHL. In this review, key words were 'disaster', 'nurs*', 'competenc*', 'ability' and 'preparedness'. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified as strategies to use in this review. The inclusion criteria for this review focused on the following: Korean nurse, articles related to disaster nursing competency, peer-review articles published in the full text in Korean and English. Review articles were excluded. Results: Nineteen studies were eligible for result extraction. A total of 10 categories of disaster nursing competency were identified: Knowledge of disaster nursing, crisis management, disaster preparation, information collection and sharing, nursing record and document management, communication, disaster plan, nursing activities in disaster response, infection management, and chemical, biological, radiation, nuclear, and explosive management. Conclusion: It is necessary to distinguish between Korean nurses' common disaster nursing competency, professional disaster nursing competency, and disaster nursing competency required in nursing practice. Therefore, future research will be needed to explore and describe disaster nursing competency.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2018

Hotel consumers tend to rely on online reviews to reduce the risk to hotel products when they book hotel rooms because hotel products are high-risk products due to their intangibility. However, the development of ICT has caused information load, and it is an important issue to be perceived as useful information to consumer because a large amount of information complicates the decision making process of consumers. Drawn from Heuristic-Systematic Model(HSM), the present study explored the role of heuristic and systematic cues composing an online review influencing consumers' perception of hotel online reviews. More specifically, this study identified reviewers' identity, level of the reviewer, review star ratings, and attached hotel photo as heuristic cue, while review length, cognitive level of review and negativity in review as systematic cues. The binary logistic regression was adopted for analysis. This study found that only systematic cues of online review were found to affect the usefulness of it. Moreover, we preceded further study examining the moderating effect of seasonality in the relationships between systematic cues and usefulness.

• 대한기관윤리심의기구협의회지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2023

In the United States (US), due to the Common Rule, completely revised in 2017, single Institutional Review Board (IRB) review has become mandatory for government-sponsored multi-institutional research since 2020 regardless of the number of participating institutions. The goal of these changes is to reduce redundant reviews by the IRB at each institution and better protect research participants. In this paper, single IRB and Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) in the US and Korea were compared and considered, and their implications were discussed. A comparison of the HRPP evaluation and certification systems of the US and Korea includes that of SMART IRB in the US and Korea Central IRB, aiming at single IRB review for efficient review with support from the country and building a more efficient national human subject research network in the future. Its comparison and analysis will be helpful in deriving future tasks and development directions of single IRB and HRPP in Korea.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.59-73
• /
• 2022

개방형동료심사는 투고된 학술논문을 투명하게 심사할 목적으로 심사자의 신원, 심사의견, 심사결과를 저자를 포함한 일반 독자에게 공개하는 심사 방식이다. 개방형동료심사 인식에 관한 선행연구가 진행되었지만, 국내 과학기술 분야 학술지 편집담당자 관점에서 이러한 인식을 조사하고 분석한 연구는 찾아볼 수 없었다. 구체적으로, 학술지 편집위원의 개방형동료심사 적용 의향, 적용 시기 및 새로운 심사 방식을 채택할 때 예상되는 도전과 기회, 개방형동료심사 지원을 위한 투고심사시스템 요구사항에 관한 조사 및 분석은 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 논문은 개방형동료심사에 대한 학술지 편집담당자의 인식을 조사하고 이러한 심사를 편리하게 지원하는 투고심사시스템의 핵심적인 요구사항을 이해하기 위해, 설문문항 준비, 설문조사 실시, 응답 결과를 분석하였다. 또한, 일부 과학기술 학술지 편집위원장을 대상으로 개방형동료심사에 관한 표적집단인터뷰를 수행하였다. 이후, 개방형동료심사 인식에 관한 본 연구의 분석 결과, 표적집단인터뷰 결과 및 국외 유사 설문조사 사례를 비교, 분석하고 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구 결과는 국내 학술단체에서 새로운 논문심사 방식의 정책 수립 및 시행, 투고심사시스템의 개방형동료심사를 위한 기능 탑재 및 선택 등의 의사결정에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.