1 |
Hyun, M. S., & Cho, K. S. (2004). Analysis of Review Results, Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2004 Workshop (pp. 1-29), Seoul, Korean Society of Nursing Science
|
2 |
Kim, K. B., Sin, K. R., Kim, S. S., Yoo, E. K., Kim, N, C, Park, E. S., Kim, H. S., Lee, K. S., Kim, S. Y., & Seo, Y. O. (2005). Qualitative research methodology. Seoul : Hyunmoonsa
|
3 |
Woods, N. F. (1988). Nursing Research: Theory and Practice. Mosby Com
|
4 |
Provenzale, J. M., Stanley, R. J. (2005). A systemic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Am J Roentgenol, 185(4), 848-854
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Weber, E. J., Katz, P. P., Waeckerle, J. F., & Callaham, M. L. (2002). Author perception of peer review : impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction. JAMA, 287(21), 2790-2793
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Han, D. S. (2005). Reviewer's role, The Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors 2005 Workshop (pp. 19-27), Seoul. The Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors
|
7 |
Benos, D. J, Kirk, K. L., & Hall, J E. (2003). How to review a paper. Adv Physiol Educ, 27(2), 47-52
DOI
|
8 |
Bordage G. (2001). Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med, 76, 889-896
DOI
ScienceOn
|