Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2022.22.10.059

A Study on Science and Technology Scholarly Societies' Understanding on Open Peer Review  

Jeong, Yong-il (한국과학기술정보연구원)
Ro, Ji-Yoon (한국과학기술정보연구원)
Cho, Sung-nam (한국과학기술정보연구원)
Ahn, Sungsoo (한국과학기술정보연구원)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.22, no.10, 2022 , pp. 59-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
Open peer review intends to help review a manuscript in a transparent and accountable manner, opening up the identity of a reviewer and authors in a scholarly journal. Although some research about open peer review, for example, authors' understanding of open peer review, exists, research about editors' perspectives of a scholarly journal in Korean domestic science and technology fields has not been found. Editors' views may include whether an academic journal plans to adopt open peer review, when they might adopt it, or what the possible benefits, challenges, and issues in adopting open peer review would be. This paper presents a survey scheme, data, and analysis of Korean editors' perspectives on open peer review. Specifically, we designed the online survey questionnaire, collected the survey data from journal editors, and analyzed the survey results to explore editors' understanding of open peer review. We then compared our research with previous work, such as our Focused Group Interview and other similar domestic and foreign analysis. This study result is expected to help make an open peer review policy for public institutes to provide essential services for scholarly journals, including a scholarly peer review system. Academic society may also get some insights in adopting the open peer review method in the peer-review process.
Keywords
Science Technology; Academic Society; Open Peer Review; Scholarly Peer Review System;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 N. B. Shah, "WSDM 2021 tutorial on systematic challenges and computational solutions on bias and unfairness in peer review," Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2021.
2 L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos, "Non-functional requirements in software engineering," Springer Science & Business Media, Vol.5, 2012.
3 J. A. Holstein and S. W. Gubrium, The Active Interview, Sage, 1995.
4 B. Glaser and Strauss, Theoretical sensitivity, The Sociology, 1978.
5 유수현, 김혜선, "오픈액세스를 통한 디지털 포용의 실현," 한국과학기술정보연구원, KISTI Issue Brief 제32호, 2021.   DOI
6 T. S. Seo, S. N. Cho, and S. A. Park, "A Study on Development of XML Journal Publishing Platform: KPubS," Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference, pp.1184-1186, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3745/PKIPS.Y2015M10A.1184   DOI
7 L. F. Fontenelle and T. D. Sarti, "Attitudes toward open peer review among stakeholders of a scholar-led journal in Brazil," Transinformacao, 33, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202133e200072   DOI
8 M. P. Eve and A. Byers, Janeway: A scholarly communications platform, Insights: the UKSG journal, 2018.
9 이민영, 연구자들의 동료심사에 대한 인식 및 대안적 학술평가지표의 활용에 관한 연구, 성균관대학교, 석사학위논문, 2017.
10 https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-fut ure/open-science/recommendation, 2021.
11 OECD, Making Open Science a Reality, OECD Science, OECD Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en.   DOI
12 S. Kim, H. Choi, N. Kim, E. Chung, and J. Y. Lee, "Comparative analysis of manuscript management systems for scholarly publishing," Science Editing, Vol.5, No.2, pp.124-134, 2018. https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.137   DOI
13 D. H. Choi and T. S. Seo, "Development of an open peer review system using blockchain and reviewer recommendation technologies," Science Editing, Vol.8, No.1, pp.104-111, 2021. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.237   DOI
14 이효빈, 조영돈, 김해도, "학술연구와 관련된 동료심사 (Peer+Review)의 윤리기준에 관한 연구," NRF Issue Report, 제2021_3호, 2022.
15 정경희, 이재윤, 정은경, 최상희, "한국연구재단 오픈 액세스 정책 실행방안 연구," 정보관리학회지, 제37권, 제4호, pp.255-286, 2020.   DOI
16 김지영, 김현수, 심원식, "메가 OA 학술지 국내 저자의 오픈 피어 리뷰 인식에 관한 연구," 정보관리학회지, 제37권, 제4호, pp.131-150, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.4.131   DOI
17 정경희, "오픈액세스 출판에 대한 학술지 편집인의 인식 연구," 정보관리학회지, 제28권, 제4호, pp.183-200, 2011.   DOI
18 김성우, 하이퍼레저 패브릭을 활용한 공개 동료심사시스템, 강원대학교 대학원, 석사학위논문, 2020.
19 T. Ross-Hellauer and E. Gorogh, "Guidelines for open peer review implementation," Research Integrity and Peer Review, Vol.4, No.1, pp.1-12, 2019.   DOI
20 R. Ahn, S. Supakkul, L. Zhao, K. Kolluri, T. Hill, and L. Chung, "A Goal-Oriented Approach for Preparing a Machine-Learning Dataset to Support Business Problem Validation," In 2021 IEEE Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing (CBDCom), IEEE, pp.282-289, 2021.
21 E. Chung, N. Kim, J. Y. Lee, K. H. Joung, S. Y. Bai, and H. Hwang, "Measuring the maturity of open access: a preliminary study," iConferences, iSchools, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/113731
22 J. P. Tennant, J. M. Dugan, D. Graziotin, D. C. Jacques, F. Waldner, D. Mietchen, ... and J. Colomb, "A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review," F1000Research, Vol.6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3   DOI
23 M. H. Cantrell and M. R. Donaldson, "Perspectives on a "Unified Approach" to the Future of Open Access," Scholarly Kitchen, 2022. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/01/11/guest-post-perspectives-on-a-unified-approach-to-the-future-of-open-access/
24 R. Smith, "Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals," Journal of the royal society of medicine, Vol.99, No.4, pp.178-182, 2006. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177 /014107680609900414   DOI
25 Q. Dai, E. Shin, and C. Smith, Open and inclusive collaboration in science: A framework, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2018/07, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/2dbff737-en.   DOI
26 조재인, "국내 연구자의 국제 학술지 동료 심사 활동에 관한 연구: Publons를 중심으로," 한국비블리아학회지, 제33권, 제1호, pp.5-24, 2022.
27 J. A. Teixeira da Silva and J. Dobranszki, "Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review," Accountability in research, Vol.22, No.1, pp.22-40, 2015.   DOI
28 R. Ahn, S. Supakkul, L. Zhao, K. Kolluri, T. Hill, and L. Chung, Validating Business Problem Hypotheses: A Goal-Oriented and Machine Learning-Based Approach, 2022. In: Wei, J., Zhang, LJ. (eds) Big Data - BigData 2021. BigData 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), Vol.12988, Springer, Cham.
29 S. J. Im, "OECD 오픈사이언스 정책과 글로벌 동향," Korea Information Processing Society Review, 제23권, 제5호, pp.4-10, 2016. https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201630932329297.page
30 T. Ross-Hellauer, A. Deppe, and B. Schmidt, "Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers," PLoS one, Vol.12, No.12, e0189311, 2017.   DOI
31 최동훈, 서태설, "Development of an open peer review system using blockchain and reviewer recommendation technologies," Science Editing, Vol.8, No.1, pp.104-111, 2021.   DOI
32 H. Irfanullah, "The Other Diversity in Scholarly Publishing," Scholarly Kitchen, 2022. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/01/24 /the-other-diversity-in-scholarly-publishing/
33 김순, 이보람, 김환민, 김혜선, "오픈사이언스 시대를 위한 과학기술 연구지원 서비스 동향 분석," 정보관리학회지, 제34권, 제3호, pp.229-249, 2017.   DOI
34 T. Ross-Hellauer, "What is open peer review? A systematic review," F1000Research, Vol.6, 2017. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2   DOI