• Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.59-73
• /
• 2003

Throughout this paper, we denote that R is a near-ring and G an R-group. We initiate the study of R-substructures of G, representations of R on G, monogenic R-groups, faithful R-groups and faithful D.G. representations of near-rings. Next, we investigate some properties of monogenic near-ring groups, faithful monogenic near-ring groups, monogenic and faithful D.G. representations in near-rings.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.171-177
• /
• 2009

Throughout this paper, we denote that R is a near-ring and G an R-group. We initiate a study of R-substructures of G, monogenic R-groups, faithful R-groups and faithful D.G. representations of near-rings. Next, we investigate some properties of monogenic R-groups, faithful monogenic R-groups and a generalization of annihilator concepts in R-groups.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.151-164
• /
• 2003

Throughout this paper, we will consider that R is a near-ring and G is an R-group. We initiate the study of monogenic and strongly monogenic R-groups and their basic properties. Also, we investigate some properties of D.G. R-groups, faithful R-groups and monogenic R-groups and we determine that when near-rings are rings.

• Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.183-190
• /
• 2007

In this paper, we will introduce the noetherian quotients in R-groups, and then investigate the related substructures of the near-ring R and G and the R-group G. Also, applying the annihilator concept in R-groups and d.g. near-rings, we will survey some properties of the substructures of R and G in monogenic R-groups and faithful R-groups.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.305-312
• /
• 2011

In this paper, we denote that R is a near-ring and G an R-group. We initiate the study of the substructures of R and G. Next, we investigate some properties of R-groups, d.g. near-rings and monogenic (R, S)-groups.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.26 no.1_2
• /
• pp.401-406
• /
• 2008

In this paper, we will introduce the noetherian quotients in R-groups, and then investigate the related substructures of the near-ring R and G and the R-group G. Also, applying the annihilator concept in R-groups and d.g. near-rings, we will survey some properties of the substructures of R and G in monogenic Rgroups, and show that R becomes a ring for faithful monogenic R-groups with some condition.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.1366-1385
• /
• 2018

Recently, government policy focuses on R&D subsidies for venture firms in the early and medium stage. However, due to the 'asymmetric information' on those firms, a concern about the possibility of adverse selection of government policy, that is, whether the R&D subsidies are offered to the less-growth potential venture firms is on the rise. Therefore, based on the "2015 venture firm's survey" data in Korea, we compared the managerial efficiency of venture firms in manufacturing sectors by dividing them into beneficiary and non-beneficiary groups at government R&D subsidies. We found that the beneficiary groups showed lower managerial efficiency than non-beneficiary groups, even if they are superior to non-beneficiary groups in technological performance. We also observed that the phenomenon involve 'low managerial efficiency in the beneficiary groups' is more relevant in mid-high tech. manufacturing sectors. Our findings provide an exploratory empirical evidence of the concern about adverse selection in the selection of R&D subsidies beneficiary groups. Therefore, the government should consider managerial performance as the key criteria for selecting R&D subsidies beneficiary groups, rather than depending on technological performance solely. Furthermore, the government should develop other complementary policies to support financial performance of the groups. Lastly, the government should make those policies attract venture firms with potential to achieve financial performance.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.601-618
• /
• 2004

Throughout this paper, we will consider that R is a near-ring and G an R-group. We initiate the study of monogenic, strongly monogenic R-groups, 3 types of nonzero R-groups and their basic properties. At first, we investigate some properties of D.G. (R, S)-groups, faithful R-groups, monogenic R-groups, simple and R-simple R-groups. Next, we introduce modular right ideals, t-modular right ideals and 3 types of primitive near-rings. The purpose of this paper is to investigate some properties of primitive types near-rings and their characterizations.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.35-53
• /
• 2011

This paper originates from the questions concerning why Korea has had difficulties in boosting R&D service industries regardless of government efforts over a decade. We first review the intrinsic nature of the R&D services and set up four criteria such as establishment type, diversification of business models, coverage of client firms, and role of R&D service firms as innovation drivers and IP strategies, that will be used in interviewing and analyzing R&D service firms. Second, we carry out in-depth interviews of eighteen R&D service firms to understand business behaviors and relevant characteristics. Finally, we identify five groups of R&D service firms and conclude that differentiated polices have to be implemented according to the groups for promoting the industry effectively.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.83-108
• /
• 1995

The two groups of research and management staff working in the government-supported research institutes are shown different in their cognitive styles on R&D management. Identifying the differences and understanding the reasons why such differences exist are th prerequisites for working out an effective R&D management. The investigation was made with emphasis on the cognitive styles regarding the core elements of R&D managements such as R&D process, manpower, budget and information required for R&D activities. The cognitive styles on R&D management shown distinct between the two groups suggest in turn that narrowing down the diference could provide the way to more effective R&D management.