• 대한수학회보
• /
• 제51권2호
• /
• pp.339-356
• /
• 2014

In this paper, we introduce and discuss the notion of $D_C$-projective modules over commutative rings, where C is a semidualizing module. This extends Gillespie and Ding, Mao's notion of Ding projective modules. The properties of $D_C$-projective dimensions are also given.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.243-252
• /
• 2010

In this paper we extend the projective properties of representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left R-modules to the projective properties of representations of quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left $R[x]$-modules. We show that if P is a projective left R-module then $0{\rightarrow}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. And we show $0{\rightarrow}L$ is a projective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as R-module if and only if $0{\rightarrow}L[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. Then we show if P is a projective left R-module then $R[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. We also show that if $L\longrightarrow^{id}L$ is a projective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as R-module, then $L[x]\longrightarrow^{id}L[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules.

• 대한수학회보
• /
• 제60권4호
• /
• pp.895-903
• /
• 2023

In this paper, we give some results on 2-strongly Gorenstein projective modules and related rings. We first investigate the relationship between strongly Gorenstein projective modules and periodic modules and then give the structure of modules over strongly Gorenstein semisimple rings. Furthermore, we prove that a ring R is 2-strongly Gorenstein hereditary if and only if every ideal of R is Gorenstein projective and the class of 2-strongly Gorenstein projective modules is closed under extensions. Finally, we study the relationship between 2-Gorenstein projective hereditary and 2-Gorenstein projective semisimple rings, and we also give an example to show the quotient ring of a 2-Gorenstein projective hereditary ring is not necessarily 2-Gorenstein projective semisimple.

• 호남수학학술지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.339-344
• /
• 2014

In this paper, we give some properties on projective modules, locally cyclic projective modules and the ideal ${\tau}(M)$.

• 대한수학회논문집
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.615-620
• /
• 2003

Semi-meet-prime projective modules and fully invariant meet-prime submodules of a projective module are studied. Actually a generalization of the Schur's lemma and semi-prime endmorphism rings of projective modules are considered.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.343-352
• /
• 2012

In this paper we show that the projective properties of representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left $R[x]$-modules. We show that if P is a projective left R-module then $0{\longrightarrow}0{\longrightarrow}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, but $P[x]{\longrightarrow}0{\longrightarrow}0$ is not a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, if $P{\neq}0$. And we show a representation $0{\longrightarrow}P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ of a quiver Q is a projective representation, if P is a projective left R-module, but $P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]{\longrightarrow}0$ is not a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, if $P{\neq}0$. Then we show a representation $P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ of a quiver Q is a projective representation, if P is a projective left R-module.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.587-606
• /
• 2017

This paper is a continuation of study semi-potentness endomorphism rings of module. We give some other characterizations of endomorphism ring to be semi-potent. New results are obtained including necessary and sufficient conditions for the endomorphism ring of semi(injective) projective module to be semi-potent. Finally, we characterize a module M whose endomorphism ring it is semi-potent via direct(injective) projective modules. Several properties of the endomorphism ring of a semi(injective) projective module are obtained. Besides to that, many necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained for semi-projective, semi-injective modules to be semi-potent and co-semi-potent modules.

• 대한수학회보
• /
• 제56권2호
• /
• pp.373-382
• /
• 2019

In this note, we mainly discuss strongly Gorenstein hereditary rings. We prove that for any ring, the class of SG-projective modules and the class of G-projective modules coincide if and only if the class of SG-projective modules is closed under extension. From this we get that a ring is an SG-hereditary ring if and only if every ideal is G-projective and the class of SG-projective modules is closed under extension. We also give some examples of domains whose ideals are SG-projective.

• 대한수학회보
• /
• 제54권6호
• /
• pp.1935-1950
• /
• 2017

Let R be a Ding-Chen ring. Yang [24] and Zhang [25] asked whether or not every R-module has finite Ding projective or Ding injective dimension. In this paper, we give a new characterization of that all modules have finite Ding projective and Ding injective dimension in terms of the relationship between Ding projective and Gorenstein flat modules. We also give an example to obtain negative answer to the above question.

• 충청수학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.43-53
• /
• 1988

The main result of this paper is a characterization of almost projective modules over art in algebras by means of irreducible maps and almost split sequences. A module X is an almost projective module if and only if it has a presentation $0{\longrightarrow}L{\longrightarrow^{\alpha}}P{\longrightarrow}X{\longrightarrow}0$ with projective module P and irreducible maps ${\alpha}$. Let X be an injective almost projective non simple module and $0{\rightarrow}Dtr(x){\rightarrow}E{\rightarrow}X{\rightarrow}0$ be an almost split sequence. If $E=E_1{\oplus}E_2$ is a direct decomposition of indecomposable modules then ${\ell}(X)=3$.