• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제45권6호
• /
• pp.299-307
• /
• 2015

Objective: The aims of this study were to compare the shear bond strength between orthodontic metal brackets and glazed zirconia using different types of primer before applying resin cement and to determine which primer was more effective. Methods: Zirconia blocks were milled and embedded in acrylic resin and randomly assigned to one of four groups: nonglazed zirconia with sandblasting and zirconia primer (NZ); glazed zirconia with sandblasting, etching, and zirconia primer (GZ); glazed zirconia with sandblasting, etching, and porcelain primer (GP); and glazed zirconia with sandblasting, etching, zirconia primer, and porcelain primer (GZP). A stainless steel metal bracket was bonded to each target surface with resin cement, and all specimens underwent thermal cycling. The shear bond strength of the specimens was measured by a universal testing machine. A scanning electron microscope, three-dimensional optical surface-profiler, and stereoscopic microscope were used to image the zirconia surfaces. The data were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance and the Fisher exact test. Results: Group GZ showed significantly lower shear bond strength than did the other groups. No statistically significant differences were found among groups NZ, GP, and GZP. All specimens in group GZ showed adhesive failure between the zirconia and resin cement. In groups NZ and GP, bonding failed at the interface between the resin cement and bracket base or showed complex adhesive and cohesive failure. Conclusions: Porcelain primer is the more appropriate choice for bonding a metal bracket to the surface of a full-contour glazed zirconia crown with resin cement.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.55-64
• /
• 1992

This study investigated the effect of porcelain primer on bonding of coomposite resin to porcelain surface. In order to test the bond strength between porcelain and composite resin, porcelain cylinders were embedded in acrylic resin, and polished with 240grit silicone caqrbide paper. The specimens were divided into twelve groups. All specimens were treated with three porcelain primers and bonded with five composite resins. All test groups were stored in $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water for 48hours. Shear bond strengths were measured with Instron(Model 4201) at a cross-head speed of 1mm/min. The obtained results were as follows : 1. Scotchprime/Silux II group and BISCO Porcelain Primer/Bisfill group showed significant higher bond strengths than Clearfil Porcelain Primer/photo Clearfil Bright group(p<0.05). And there was no significant differences in bond strengths between Scotchprime/Silux II group and BISCO Porcelain Primer/Bisfill group(p>0.05). 2. When composite resins were used with Scotchprime, the bond strengths were decresed Silux II$(16.68{\pm}3.35MPa)$, Bisfil$(16.23{\pm}4.54MPa)$, Poly-Fill$(14.74{\pm}4.08MPa)$, Photo Clearfil Bright$(13.75{\pm}2.89MPa)$ and Pekalux$(14.74{\pm}4.08MPa)$ in order, but there was no statistical significance(p>0.05). 3. When composite resins were used with BISCO Porcelain Primer, the bond strength were decreased Bisfil$(16.17{\pm}1.60MPa)$, Silux II$(12.13{\pm}2.37MPa)$, Poly-Fill$(10.78{\pm}1.99MPa)$, Photo Cleafil Bright $(9.91{\pm}4.59MPa)$ and Pekalux$(7.36{\pm}2.16MPa)$ in order, but there was no statistical significance(p>0.05). 4. Silux II, Photo Clearfil Bright and Poly-Fill used with Scotchprime showed significant higher bond strengths than BISCO Porcelain Primer(p>0.05).

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.423-427
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the bond strength between porcelain denture teeth (Bioblend 43D) and four different polymerized denture resins (Lucitone 199, Palapress, Acron MC, Triad) with and without a bonding agent and after four different types of surface treatment (polished, HF etched, sandblasted, air-abraded). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Central incisor porcelain denture teeth were divided into 32 groups of 5 each. Tensile bond strength (MPa) was determined using a testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Mean and standard deviation are listed. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Means were compared by Tukey-Kramer intervals at 0.05 significance level. RESULTS. All surface treatment increased bond strength compared to polished surface and the highest bond strength was found with Palapress resin with etched porcelain surface (8.1 MPa). Bonding agent improved the bond strength of all denture resins to porcelain teeth. Superior bonding was found with Palapress and air-abraded porcelain (39 MPa). CONCLUSION. Resins with different curing methods affect the bond strength of porcelain teeth to denture bases. Superior bonding was found with auto-polymerized resin (Palapress). Application of ceramic primer and bonding agent to porcelain teeth with and without surface treatment will improve the bond strength of all denture resins to porcelain teeth.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.163-173
• /
• 2024

PURPOSE. This study assessed the effect of storage time on chemical structure of a single-bottle and a two-bottle experimental ceramic primer and micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) of composite to ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study was conducted on 60 sintered zirconia and 60 feldspathic porcelain blocks. Half of the specimens (n = 30) were subjected to surface treatment with the single-bottle Clearfil ceramic primer (n = 15) and two-bottle experimental primer (n = 15) after 24 hours. The remaining half received the same surface treatments after 6 months storage in distilled water. Composite cylinders were bonded to the ceramics, and they were then subjected to µSBS test. Also, the primers underwent Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) after 24 hours and 6 months to assess their chemical structure. Data were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA and adjusted Bonferroni test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS. The µSBS of both ceramics significantly decreased at 6 months in one-bottle ceramic primer group (P = .001), but it was not significantly different from the two-bottle experimental primer group (P = .635). FTIR showed hydrolysis of single-bottle primer, cleavage of silane and 10-MDP bonds, and formation of siloxane bonds after 6 months. CONCLUSION. Six months of storage caused significant degradation of single-bottle ceramic primer, and consequently had an adverse effect on µSBS.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.195-204
• /
• 2008

치아 우식증과 침식증의 진단과 본 연구는 교정용 밴드 사용의 대안으로 제시된 직접 부착 술식이 보철 치료를 받은 치아상에서도 적절한 결합 강도를 갖으면서 임상적으로 유용하게 사용될 수 있는지를 평가하고, 불산과 포세린 전처리제의 사용 여부에 따른 결합 강도와 접착 파절 양상의 차이에 대해 알아보고자 시행하였다. 사람의 상하악 소구치 치관 20개를 대조군으로, 소구치의 협면을 복제한 포세린 치관 80개를 실험군으로 나눈 후, 대조군은 37% 인산으로 산부식한 후 Transbond $XT^{(R)}$를 이용하여 금속 브라켓을 접착하였고, 실험군들은 모두 포세린 치관에 통상적으로 sandblasting 처리를 하되, 9.6% 불산으로 4분간 부식처리를 함께 한 군, 포세린 전처리제를 적용한 군, 마지막으로 sandblasting과 불산 그리고 포세린 전처리제를 모두 적용한 군으로 20개씩 나눈 후 금속 브라켓을 접착하였다. 각 군간 전단 결합 강도와 접착 파절 양상을 비교하여 관찰한 결과, 포세린 치관에 금속 브라켓을 접착할 시, 기존의 비심미적인 밴드를 사용하지 않더라도 sandblasting과 불산 그리고 포세린 전처리제를 이용한 직접 부착 술식으로 임상적으로 유용하게 사용될 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제45권4호
• /
• pp.164-170
• /
• 2015

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces using three different zirconia primers and one silane primer, and subjected to thermocycling. Methods: We designed 10 experimental groups following the surface treatment and thermocycling. The surface was treated with one of the following method: no-primer (NP), Porcelain Conditioner (PC), Z-PRIME Plus (ZP), Monobond Plus (MP) and Zirconia Liner Premium (ZL) (n=20). Then each group was subdivided to non-thermocycled and thermocycled groups (NPT, PC, ZPT, MPT, ZLT) (n=10). Orthodontic brackets were bonded to the specimens using $Transbond^{TM}$ XT Paste and light cured for 15 s at $1,100mW/cm^2$. The SBS was measured at a 1 mm/min crosshead speed. The failure mode was assessed by examination with a stereomicroscope and the amount of bonding resin remaining on the zirconia surface was scored using the modified adhesive remnant index (ARI). Results: The SBS of all experimental groups decreased after thermocycling. Before thermocycling, the SBS was ZL, $ZP{\geq}MP{\geq}PC>NP$ but after thermocycling, the SBS was $ZLT{\geq}MPT{\geq}ZPT>PCT=NPT$ (p > 0.05). For the ARI score, both of the groups lacking primer (NP and NPT) displayed adhesive failure modes, but the groups with zirconia primers (ZP, ZPT, MP, MPT, ZL, and ZLT) were associated with mixed failure modes. Conclusions: Surface treatment with a zirconia primer increases the SBS relative to no-primer or silane primer application between orthodontic brackets and zirconia prostheses.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.445-456
• /
• 1999

최근에는 교육수준의 향상, 소득증대, 대중매체의 발달 등으로 인하여 성인 교정환자의 수요가 상당히 증가하고 있다. 성인환자는 어린환자에 비해 상대적으로 구강내 도재수복물을 장착하고 있는 경우가 많아 도재치에 대한 교정용 브라켓의 직접접착의 기회도 증가하고 있다. 자연치에서는 법랑질을 산부식하여 비교적 쉽게 접착력을 증진시킬 수 있으나 도재치에서는 임상에서 브라켓이 너무 쉽게 탈락하거나 오히려 도재파절의 위험성이 존재하여 도재치에 대한 효과적인 직접접착법에 대하여 관심을 갖게 되었다. 그러나, 이러한 접착효율에 대한 다양한 연구가 있었으나 아직 정설로 받아들여지는 것은 없는 실정이다. 본 연구는 임상에서 비교적 간단히 이용할 수 있는 몇 가지 방법을 in vitro 상의 실험을 통하여 그 결과를 비교검토하여 효과적인 방법을 제시하고자 시행되었다. 우선 장석형 도재인 Ceramco II로 도재 시편을 제작하였다. 도재의 표면처리방법은 Glazing한 도재 자체를 사용하기 위해서는 무처리하였으며, 거칠기를 부여하기위해서는 불화수소산으로 산부식하거나 Microetcher II로 Sandblasting, 또는 불화수소산과 Sandblasting을 복합처리하였다. 접착레진은 화학중합형 인 Ortho-two와 광중합형인 Transbond를 사용하였다 모든 시편에는 도재 프라이머를 도포하였다. 실험군은 7가지 군으로 나누어 브라켓의 전단강도를 측정하였다. 1. 도재의 표면처리에 대한 비교에서 Ortho-two군내에서는 불화수소산이나 sandblasting으로 표면거칠기를 부여한 군이 무처리군에 비해 높은 전단강도를 갖는다. Transbond군내에서는 각각의 표면처리에 따른 유의성있는 차이가 없었다. 2. 불화수소산이나 Sandblasting처리군에서는 화학중합형 레진인 Ortho-two가 광중합형 레진인 Transbond보다 높은 전단강도를 갖는다. 3. 도재 파절율의 비교에서는 무처리군이 표면거칠기를 부여한 군에 비해 매우 낮은 파절율 갖는다. 4. E(Transbond+Intact)군의 평균전단강도는 134.4kg/$cm^2$ 로 본 실험군중 가장 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 선학들이 제안한 임상적용가능 전단강도보다 크므로 7가지군 모두 임상적으로 교정력을 가하기 에 충분한 전단강도를 갖는다. 그러나, 도재의 파절율을 고려해볼 때 파절율이 상대적으로 낮은 무처리군이 임상적으로 더 효과적일 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제45권6호
• /
• pp.805-814
• /
• 2007

Statement of problem. Composite resin-veneered metal restorations can be used as an alternative to porcelain-fused-metal restorations. But, because of the relatively low bond strength of veneering composite to metal framework, various surface treatment methods have been introduced to improve the bond strength. Purpose. The object of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of different combinations of each of the two bonding systems and each of the two composite veneering resins to cp-Ti/Co-Cr alloy. Material and methods. Two resin bonding systems (metal conditioner containing MEPS monomer, tribochemical silicoating system) and two composite resins (Gradia, Sinfony) were tested on cp-Ti and Co-Cr alloy. Then, according to manufacturers' instructions, resin bonding systems and composite resins were applied. All test specimens were divided into four groups for each alloy; I) sandblast + Metal Primer II + Gradia (MG), II) sandblast + Metal Primer II + Sinfony (MS), III) Rocatec + Gradia (RG), IV) Rocatec + Sinfony (RS). The shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine and all data were statistically analyzed with Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test at the significance level of 0.05. Results. The mean (standard deviations) of shear bond strength according to the combinations of two bonding systems and two composite resins to cp-Ti arranged from 16.44 MPa to 17.07 MPa and the shear bond strength to Co-Cr alloy ranged from 16.26 MPa to 17.70 MPa. The result shows that the difference were not statistically significant. Conclusion. The shear bond strengths of composite resins to both cast cp-Ti and Co-Cr alloy were not significantly different between the metal conditioner and the tribochemical silicoating system. And no differences in bond strength were found between cp-Ti and Co-Cr alloy.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제44권3호
• /
• pp.23.1-23.9
• /
• 2019

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the microshear bond strength (${\mu}SBS$) of different universal adhesive systems applied to hybrid computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorative materials repaired with a composite resin. Materials and Methods: Four types of CAD-CAM hybrid block materials-Lava Ultimate (LA), Vita Enamic (VE), CeraSmart (CS), and Shofu Block HC (SH)-were used in this study, in combination with the following four adhesive protocols: 1) control: porcelain primer + total etch adhesive (CO), 2) Single Bond Universal (SB), 3) All Bond Universal (AB), and 4) Clearfil Universal Bond (CU). The ${\mu}SBS$ of the composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) was measured and the data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test, with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The CAD-CAM block type and block-adhesive combination had significant effects on the bond strength values (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the following pairs of groups: VE/CO and VE/AB, CS/CO and CS/AB, VE/CU and CS/CU, and VE/AB and CS/AB (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The ${\mu}SBS$ values were affected by hybrid block type. All tested universal adhesive treatments can be used as an alternative to the control treatment for repair, except the AB system on VE blocks (the VE/AB group). The ${\mu}SBS$ values showed variation across different adhesive treatments on different hybrid CAD-CAM block types.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2011

압축강화형 복합레진($TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL)을 지르코니아 framework에 효과적으로 전장하기 위하여, 표면처리 방법을 여러 가지로 달리한 지르코니아 표면에 압축강화형 복합레진을 전장하여 전단결합강도를 실험적으로 비교하였다. 지르코니아의 표면적 증가를 도모하기 위해 최종소결 전 지름 1.1mm round bur를 사용하여 지르코니아 표면에 pockmark (honey-comb concept)를 형성하였고, 화학적으로는 Primer (Zr-plus primer, Bisco, Inc., Shaumurg, USA)를 도포하여 결합강도 증가를 도모하였다. 지르코니아에 porcelain을 적층하여 대조군으로 삼고 각 군을 5도와 55도 사이에서 10,000회 thermocycling시켜 simulated aging 결과 또한 비교하였다. 전단결합강도를 측정하였고 주사전자현미경을 통해 파절단면을 관찰하였다. Pockmark를 형성한 실험군에 압축강화형 복합레진($TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL) 전장 시 도재 전장과 유사한 전단결합 강도를 발휘하였으며,(p>0.05) 동일 시편을 24시간 수중 보관했을 때에 비해 thermocycling 했을 때의 전단결합강도가 약간 감소하였으나 유의차는 보이지 않았다.(p>0.05) 지르코니아 표면에의 Primer의 도포가 압축강화형 복합레진 ($TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL)과의 결합강도를 증가시키지는 못하였다. 지르코니아 소결 전 표면에 pockmark를 주어 표면적을 증가시키고 요철의 효과를 주는 것은 $TESCERA^{TM}$ ATL과의 결합강도를 증가시켰으며, 이는 임상적으로 지르코니아-포세린의 결합강도에 필적하는 강하고 내구성 있는 결합강도를 가져온다고 판단되었다.