The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN CP-TI/CO-CR ALLOY AND COMPOSITE RESINS

  • Yoon, Se-Hee (Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Pae, Ahran (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Seok-Hyung (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Ho-Rim (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. Composite resin-veneered metal restorations can be used as an alternative to porcelain-fused-metal restorations. But, because of the relatively low bond strength of veneering composite to metal framework, various surface treatment methods have been introduced to improve the bond strength. Purpose. The object of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of different combinations of each of the two bonding systems and each of the two composite veneering resins to cp-Ti/Co-Cr alloy. Material and methods. Two resin bonding systems (metal conditioner containing MEPS monomer, tribochemical silicoating system) and two composite resins (Gradia, Sinfony) were tested on cp-Ti and Co-Cr alloy. Then, according to manufacturers' instructions, resin bonding systems and composite resins were applied. All test specimens were divided into four groups for each alloy; I) sandblast + Metal Primer II + Gradia (MG), II) sandblast + Metal Primer II + Sinfony (MS), III) Rocatec + Gradia (RG), IV) Rocatec + Sinfony (RS). The shear bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine and all data were statistically analyzed with Mann-Whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test at the significance level of 0.05. Results. The mean (standard deviations) of shear bond strength according to the combinations of two bonding systems and two composite resins to cp-Ti arranged from 16.44 MPa to 17.07 MPa and the shear bond strength to Co-Cr alloy ranged from 16.26 MPa to 17.70 MPa. The result shows that the difference were not statistically significant. Conclusion. The shear bond strengths of composite resins to both cast cp-Ti and Co-Cr alloy were not significantly different between the metal conditioner and the tribochemical silicoating system. And no differences in bond strength were found between cp-Ti and Co-Cr alloy.

Keywords

References

  1. Barzilay I, Michael LM, Lyndon BC, Gerald NG. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90001-7
  2. Rose MJ, Moore BK, Charles JG, Carlos AMV. Microleakage and shear bond strength of resin and porcelain veneers bonded to cast alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:221-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90165-S
  3. Mukai M, Fukui H, Hasegawa J. Relationship between sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:151-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80178-7
  4. Jones TK, Hansen CA, Singer MT, Kessler HP. Dental implications of nickel hypersensitivity. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:507-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90398-7
  5. Livaditis GJ, Thompson VP. Etched castings: An improved retentive mechanism for resin-bonded retainer. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:52-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90242-6
  6. Laufer BZ, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD. SiOx-C Coating: A composite-to-metal bonding mechanism. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:320-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90277-6
  7. Kern M, Thompson VP. Effects of sandblasting and silica-coating procedures on pure titanium. J Dent 1994;22:300-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90067-1
  8. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Takaki A, Atsuta M. Surface treatment of nonprecious alloys for adhesion-fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986:55:456-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90176-9
  9. Musil R, Tiller HJ. The adhesion of dental resins to metal surfaces. In:The Kulzer Silicoater techniqu. 1st ed.Werheim, Germany: Kulzer and Co.; 1984
  10. Schneider W, Powers JM, Pierpont HP. Bond strength of composites to etched and silica-coated porcelain fusing alloys. Dent Mater 1992;8:2115
  11. Larry GR, Steven DH, Steven OH, Elrod CW. Resin to metal bond strengths using two commercial systems. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:270-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7
  12. Kenneth BM, Melinda MR. The shear bond strength of polymethyl methacrylate bonded to titanium partial denture framework material. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:410-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90076-Z
  13. Caeg.C, Leinfelder KF, Lacefield WR, Bell W. Effectiveness of a method used in bonding resins to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:37-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90150-B
  14. Kenneth BM, [alani F, Michael ER, Brien RL. Silane to enhance the bond between polymethacrylate and titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:428-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80070-8
  15. Watanabe I, Kenneth SK, Jack LK, Toru O. Effect of sandblasting and silicoating on bond strength of polymer-glass composite to cast titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:462-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70035-1
  16. Fujishima A, Fujishima Y, Jack LF. Shear bond strength of four commercial bonding systems to cp Ti. Dent Mater 1995;11:82-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80038-7
  17. Yanagida H, Matsumura Y, Taira Y, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:121-6 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00811.x
  18. SN EN ISO 10477. Polymer-based crown and bridge materials. Berlin:Breuth;2000
  19. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composites resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  20. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:573-81 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0256
  21. Vojvodic D, Jerslimov V, Celebic A, Catovic A. Bond strength of silicoated and acrylic resin bonding system to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:1-6
  22. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Taira Y, Atsuta M. Effect of three adhesive primers on the bond strengths of four lighted-activated opaque resins to noble alloy. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:168-73 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00662.x
  23. Moffa JP. Biological effects of nickel-containing dental alloys. Council on dental materials, instruments and cqu ipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;104:501-5 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1982.0223
  24. Moffa JP, Guckes AD, Okawa MT, Lilly GE. An evaluation of nonprecious alloys for use with porcelain veneers. Part II. Industrial safety and biocompatibility. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:432-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90165-0
  25. Ohkubo C, Shimura I, Aoki T, Hanatani S, Hosoi T, Okabe T. In vitro wear assessment of titanium alloy teeth. J Prosth Dent 2002;11:263-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2002.00263.x
  26. Hanson O. Strength of bond with Comspan opaque to three silicoated alloys and titanium. Scand J Dent Res 1990;101:243-251
  27. Creugers NH, Snoek P A, Van' T Hof MA, Kayser AF. Clinical performance of resin-bonded bridges: a 5 years prospective study. Ill. Failure characteristics and survival after bonding. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:179-86 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01408.x
  28. Moulin P, Degrange M, Picard B. Influence of surface treatment on adherence energy of alloys used in bonded prosthetics. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:413-21 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00388.x
  29. Tulunoglu IF, Oktemer M. Tensile strength and microleakage of the bond between a nickel-chromium alloys and a visible light-cured resin composite: effect of 4-META, silicoating, and bead retention. Quintessence Int 1997;28:447-51
  30. Stefanos GK. Bond strengths of resin-to-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:136-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70117-3
  31. Imbery TA, Evanos DB, Koeppen RG. A new method of attaching cast gold occlusal surfaces to acrylic resin denture teeth. Quintessence Int 1993;24:29-33
  32. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Curing depth of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:348-52 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00249.x
  33. Strygler H, Nicholls J, Townsend JD. Microleakage at the resin-alloy interface of chemically retained composite resins for cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:733-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80003-4
  34. Metal Primer. Technique and operating instructions. GC Co. Tokyo. Japan
  35. Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Effect of acidic primers on bonding between stainless steels and autopolymerizing methacrylic resins. J Dent 1997;25:285-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00023-1
  36. Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Adhesive bonding of stainless steels and their component metals. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1054-1059 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00619.x
  37. Imai Y. A new metal surface treatment. An extra issue of practice prosthodontics. Ishiyaku Publishers Inc. Tokyo. pp.265-267
  38. Taria Y. Yoshida K. Matsumura H. Atsuta M. Phosphate prosthodontic and thiophosphate primers for bonding prosthodontic luting material to titanium. J Prosthet Dent 1998;74:384-388
  39. Musil R, Tiller HJ. The molecular coupling of resin veneers to alloy surfaces. Dent Labor 1984; 32:1155-61
  40. Lindemann W. New resin-to-metal bonding systems. Dent Labor 1990;38:509-14
  41. Cobb DS, Vargas MM, Fridich TA, Boschlicher MR. Metal surface treatment : characterization and effect on composite-to-metal bond strength. Operative Dent 2000;25:427-33
  42. Michael B, Martin R, Gerhard G, Gerhard H. Adsesive bond of veneering composites on various metal surfaces using silicoating, titanium-coating or functional monomers. J Dent 2003;31:33-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00082-9
  43. Ohkubo C, Watanabe I, Hosoi T, Okabe T. Shear bond strengths of polymethyl methacrylate to cast titanium and cobalt-ehromium frameworks using five metal primers. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:50-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70088-6
  44. Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Suzuki E, Miyaji T. Adhesion strength of composite resin materials for veneering to cp titanium treated by several surface treatments. Jpn J Dent Mater 1991;10:130-136
  45. Hanson O, Moberg LE. Evaluation of three silicoating methods for resin-bonded prostheses. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:243-51