• 과학기술정책
• /
• 제14권2호통권146호
• /
• pp.76-93
• /
• 2004

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.244-259
• /
• 2015

환경영향평가법 개정으로 전략환경영향평가가 도입되어 대상계획을 15개 정책계획과 86개 개발기본계획 체계로 개편하여 시행하였지만 최근 평가 대상계획의 확대에 대한 논의가 국가 환경영향평가 정책의 중요한 이슈이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 각국의 법령이나 지침에 제시된 전략환경평가 대상계획을 비교하여 대상계획에 포함되어야 하는 계획들을 제안하고자 한다. 총 10개국의 전략환경평가 대상계획을 조사하였으며, 대상계획이 법령이나 지침에 명시되어 있는 독일, 프랑스, 이탈리아, 영국 및 네덜란드의 사례들을 우리나라 전략환경영향평가 대상계획과 비교하였다. 본 연구를 통해 다수 국가의 연방수준 계획에 포함되어 있으며 환경에 상당한 영향을 미칠 것으로 예상되는 도시계획 분야와 에너지계획 분야의 상위계획 중 광역도시계획, 도시 군 기본계획, 에너지기본계획, 전력수급기본계획들을 전략환경영향평가 대상계획에 포함할 것을 제안하였다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.107-120
• /
• 2007

The introduction of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has strengthened and extended the value of environmental impact assessment (EIA) as a foundational tool for sustainable development. In particular, SEA helps to overcome the limitation of project EIA as a 'stand alone' approach, applied relatively late in the decision making cycle. SEA is applied to policy, plan and programme (3P) proposals, when major alternatives are open and systematic consideration can be given to their environmental effects. This process also corresponds to options appraisal of development proposal to find the best practical outcome having regard to all potential impacts. There are imperatives for sustainable development (SD) that are shaping future directions for EIA and SEA internationally, regionally and locally. There is a shift toward more integrative approaches of using EIA and SEA as sustainability tools in cooperated environmental management system (EMS). Korea has established and applied EIA for over twenty years for various projects. Given its coverage, the current EIA system is SEA exclusive. The Prior Environmental Review System (PERS), which is a SEA-type of system, was applied in the late 1990s, mainly for various developing planning programs. The current PERS has been modified as a SEA type system, but in general, policy is not going to be covered.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.307-314
• /
• 2004

Among large developmental projects, those of the government and public institutions with the total budget of more than 50billion wons can be executed only when the feasibility of the project has been testified through the procedure of preliminary feasibility study. Multi-purpose dams are public structures that can supply water, produce electricity, and control flood, they belong to large national projects that require legal evaluation procedures such as preliminary feasibility study and environmental impact assessment(EIA). The index that should be considered to be important in dam plan is the migration of residents in submerged district. The importance in the preliminary feasibility study is 4.93 points(98.6 in the scale of 100 at maximum). Among the 12 assessment elements of the policy and economy in the preliminary feasibility study, the element of environment assessment is turned out to be 4.68 points in the assessment importance (93.5 in the scale of 100 at maximum), which is the second in the total ranking and the first in the field of policy, indicating that the element is very important in dam construction planning.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.27-60
• /
• 2016

기후경제통합평가모형(Integrated assessment model of climate and the economy)은 기후변화에 관한 경제 분석과 정책제안을 위한 필수적인 도구가 되어왔다. 최근에는 기후변화에 대응하기 위한 정책적 노력들이 대부분 국가 또는 지역 수준에서 일어난다는 인식 하에 국가 또는 지역에서의 기후변화 영향과 정책수단의 효과를 평가할 수 있는 기후경제통합-지역평가모형(Regional integrated assessment model of climate and the economy)의 중요성이 더욱 커지고 있다. 이 논문에서는 국내에서 기후경제통합-지역평가모형을 개발하기 위한 첫 번째 단계로서 사회후생함수를 중심으로 기후경제통합-지역평가모형을 이론적으로 유형화했으며, RICE(Regional integrated climate-economy model) 모형을 통해 기후변화 대응전략에 따른 국가별 기후변화정책의 변화를 수치적으로 살펴보았다. 변화하는 국제 상황, 새롭게 드러나는 과학적 증거, 국내 여건 등을 모두 반영한 기후변화정책을 수립하기 위해서는 이를 분석할 수 있는 효과적인 도구를 갖추고 있어야 한다. 이 논문에서 살펴본 기후경제통합-지역평가모형은 이를 위한 유용한 도구가 될 수 있다.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2001년도 Proceedings of International Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
• /
• pp.168.1-168.1
• /
• 2001

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 2010

Background : If different cost efficiency indexes were informed to the same clinic depending on the inclusion or exclusion of pharmacy cost, it may impair the reliability of provider-profiling system. This study aimed to investigate whether the omission of pharmacy cost affects cost-efficiency rankings in medical clinics. Methods : Data for ambulatory care cost at 23,112 medical clinics were collected from the claims database, which was constructed after review by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea in April 2007. We calculated two types of cost efficiency indexes by inclusion or exclusion of pharmacy cost for a medical clinic. The agreement between the decile rankings of the two indexes was also assessed using the weighted kappa statistic of Landis and Koch. Results : When the cost efficiency index for total cost including pharmacy cost was compared with the index for total cost excluding it, the agreement between the two indexes was only 55%. The agreements between the two indexes were relatively low within specialties which have larger pharmacy volume of total cost and lower correlation between total cost with or without pharmacy cost included than the average level of all the specialties. Conclusion : These results suggest that the omission of pharmacy cost may result in contradictory outcomes that may be confusing to a medical institution and may impair the reliability of provider-profiling systems. It is very important to standardize profiling criteria for the reliability of provider profiling system.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제32권5호
• /
• pp.363-376
• /
• 2023

기후변화와 무분별한 개발 등으로 인해 생물다양성의 감소와 멸종 위험이 심각해짐에 따라 자연생태계에 대한 보전의 중요성이 높아지고 있다. 이러한 상황에서 본 연구는 자연자원과 생태계 변화 등에 대한 정보제공을 목적으로 한 평가기반의 자연생태 전망평가체계에 대한 국외 사례를 검토하였다. 결과로서 국외에서는 국내와 유사하게 다양한 조사기관에서 분류군별 조사를 수행하고 있으며 조사된 자료가 통합적으로 수집·관리되고 단기간내 지속적으로 제공되고 있다. 또한 기초조사 자료와 함께 평가기반의 예측·전망 정보를 제공함으로써 국가정책 및 환경영향평가 등에서의 활용도가 높은 것으로 조사되었다. 이를 바탕으로 국내 자연생태 조사 현황과 환경영향평가 등에서의 정보이용의 한계성을 분석하고 자연생태 정책수립 지원 등 정보로서의 자연생태 전망평가체계 작성 필요성에 대해 고찰하였다. 또한 제안된 자연생태 전망평가 등의 다양한 정보를 통해 국내 자연생태계 정책에 효과적으로 활용할 수 있는 정책방향을 제안하였다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.73-86
• /
• 1995

This paper demonstrates Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has to be applied for development projects with regard to the ecological, economical and social aspects before any decisions made in the project. Korea has confronted various environmental problems during the last fifteen years, even though EIA has been enacted since 1981. The role of impact assessment in planning and policy processes should be emphasized to investigate the magnitude and intensity of the adverse influences of economic development. In the Seoul Metropolitan Region, it is necessary to apply EIA all urban projects to reduce the adverse effects of urbanization. Special attention should be given to the climatological effects throughout the urbanization process in Korea to keep the urban area energy-efficient. This study intends not only to establish basic data for national-and regional-based land-use policy in the environmental aspects, but also to provide the basic data for the possible climate model (scenarios) that may provide spatial and temporal variability by analyzing the actual climatic record. There is a noticeable impact of urbanization on the atmospheric environment in the Seoul Metropolitan Region. In this sense, the climatic aspect must be taken into consideration in the process of EIA to mitigate the well-known climatic alterations of urbanization. Moreover, the techniques of assessment should be improved by developing geo-reference data sets to build models of the global climate in response to the man-made environmental change.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.35-51
• /
• 2003

This study purports to develop a quality assessment tool for the process of health promotion programs at public health centers(PHC). The draft of the assessment tool developed by the literature was distributed to 242 staffs who were in charge of the health promotion programs at PHCs for evaluating the feasibility of the tool on September and October 2002. The major results of the study were as follows; The quality assessment tool developed in the study consisted of four domains: strategic planning, program management, monitoring and evaluation, and resources and information. The strategic planning dealt with the function of the planning staff and committees, community data analysis, the feasibility of the program, and the approach methods for attaining the goal of the program. The program management included the items on the qualification and power of the program staff. The monitoring and evaluation included the items on the reporting and communication among program units, and feed back after monitoring. Finally, the resources and information dealt with community networking, clients' response, and consulting activity of the staff. The validity of the tools was tested and partly supported by both formative and criterion-related methods. The assessment tools developed in this study could be used by health promotion workers in the self-evaluation of the program quality. In conclusion, the quality assessment tool developed in the study will be a good safeguard for assuring the quality of the process of health promotion programs.