• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide essential resources on various evaluation strategies by identifying relationships between professor-evaluation, peer-evaluation, and self-evaluation of the core basic nursing skills in nursing students. Methods: Forty third-year nursing students who participated in core basic nursing skills were given the same checklist that was used for assessment by the examiners. Then, the scores of the professor and the students were compared and analyzed with SPSS/WIN 18.0. Results: The scores of the student peer (178.54) and student self-evaluation(177.74) was significantly higher than the scores of professor-evaluation (172.05),(F=5.03, p=.008). There was a significant, positive correlation between the professor-evaluation and the student-peer-evaluation in skill-scores(r=.47, p=.002) and attitude-scores(r=.52, p<.001). In addition, the professor-evaluation and the self-evaluation each showed a significant, positive correlation in skill-scores(r=.61, p<.001) and attitude-scores(r=.36, p=.023). Conclusion: The study result indicates that in order to expand the evaluation method, the professor evaluation, as well as the student self and the peer evaluation, will contribute to improve the educational achievement of learners.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.115-122
• /
• 2018

본 연구의 목적은 치위생학과 팀기반 수업에서 지필시험, 팀별평가, 팀원평가, 자기평가 등 다양한 학생평가방법을 비교하는 것이다. 분석대상은 2016, 2017학년도에 '구강보건교육학 실습' 교과목을 수강한 학생들의 점수이고, 기술통계, Spearman 상관분석, 왜도와 첨도, Mann-Whitney U 검정 등의 분석방법을 사용하였다. 네 가지 학생평가방법 중 자기평가와 팀원평가만 정적인 상관관계를 보였고, 팀원평가보다 자기평가를 관대하게 하였으며, 자기평가점수가 가장 중심화되어 있었다. 자기평가 여부에 따라 동료평가 점수의 관대화와 중심화 경향을 비교한 결과, 자기평가를 실시한 그룹에서 팀원평가를 더 관대하게 했으며, 더 중심화되게 평가하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 치위생학과 팀기반 학습에서 각종 평가방법에 대해 비교하고 자기평가 여부에 따라 동료평가 결과에 차이가 있다는 것을 발견했다는 데에 의의가 있다.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.536-544
• /
• 2009

Purpose : This study aimed to examine the relationship between intragroup peer evaluation and self-directed learning readiness(SDLR) in an Introduction to Education class that used a team based learning(TBL). Moreover, it identified the specific components of the SDLR that predicted the peer evaluation results. Method : The research subject pool comprised of 87 $1^{st}$ students in D Health College. Each team was composed of 6~8 members, each of whom evaluated all other members on his or her team SDLR was measured by using SDLR-K-96. Results : SDLR and peer assessment scores had a positive relationship, confirming that SDLR was an important variable that could predict the peer evaluation scores. Among the SDLR factors, 'openness to challenge' and 'self-confidence as a learner' was shown to have the predictive power for the peer assessment. Conclusion : The colleges should provide dental hygiene students with learning opportunities on ability to do self-directed learning through diverse learning methods such as team based learning.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제21권5호
• /
• pp.32-39
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a behaviorally anchored rating scale for peer evaluation in group projects based on social interdependence theory. A mixed method involving a qualitative and quantitative approach was used in this study. In the qualitative study, both the individual and group interviews were conducted to college students regarding their cooperative learning experiences. Data from this qualitative research was analyzed based on 5 elements of cooperative learning and 'critical incidents' were extracted from students' own voices that would serve as specific rating criteria in the scale. Once the 'critical incidents' have been incorporated into the scale, validation from 3 independent experts was conducted. In the quantitative study, correlations with relevant variables were analyzed to examine the criteria-referenced validity. Findings suggest that the behaviorally anchored rating scale for peer evaluation in group projects can be used in various team-based learning contexts.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.97-114
• /
• 2008

This research has three purposes: The first purpose is to verify whether SGRs(Student-Generated Rubrics) are effective for learner achievement in higher education or not. The second one is to analyze the agreements between an instructor's evaluations and peer group assessments with SGRs in real classroom situation. The final purpose is to propose the possibility of students' more objective self-evaluation with the use of SGRs. It appears that rubrics are effective tools to improve learner achievement in adult education and to promote the agreement between the instructor's and peer's evaluations, even though learners do not develop SGRs. In addition, this research has demonstrated that most students are not very accurate self-assessors, and they often overestimate themselves. This study can be helpful for novice instructors, especially for those who try to assess their students more fairly, to develop the SGRs as an evaluation tool appropriate for their own situation, and to give more reliable feedback to students.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.37-53
• /
• 2022

Objectives : This study analyzed the concordance between student self-assessment and peer-evaluation in a role play using the Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) scenario developed based on Korean medical syndrome differentiation. Methods : The subjects of this study are first-year-students majoring in Korean Medicine. The role play based on clinical case was performed in the class of Korean Medicine Classics. Feedback on clinical skill competency got through student self-assessment and peer-evaluation, and this study was compared and analyzed of result. Results : A simple comparison of the results of self-assessment and peer-evaluation in the evaluation results of clinical skill competency may appear to be consistent. However, it was not statistically significant. It is necessary to enhance the discriminative ability in the evaluation of clinical skill competency. It will be possible to improve a bit by relatively increasing the weight of the scores on the items that students expect to respond differently among the evaluation items. In addition, in order to dramatically improve the systemicity and reliability of the evaluation of clinical skill competency itself, it is necessary to introduce the Introduction to Clinical Traditional Korean Medicine (ICTKM) course. Conclusions : Student's self-assessment and peer-evaluation as feedback on clinical skill competency are suitable for the purpose of education and training. However, the reliability of the evaluation was not statistically significant.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.107-114
• /
• 2022

본 논문에서는 컴퓨터학부 기초전공 수업에서 팀 활동에 대한 학생평가의 활용성을 분석하였다. 이를 위해, 동료평가, 자기평가, 학업성취도 사이의 관계를 알아보고자 상관분석을 실시하여 이들 사이에는 모두 통계적으로 유의한 양의 상관관계가 있음을 알아냈다. 이어서 동료평가 점수와 자기평가 점수의 차이를 분석하였다. 일표본 t-test를 실시했을 때 그 차이 값은 매우 유의미한 것이었다. 그러나 그 차이의 정도는 두 클래스에서 다르지 않았다. 즉 학생들은 학년에 상관없이 본인 스스로에 대한 평가 점수가 동료들로부터 받은 평가 점수보다 평균적으로 후한 경향이 있었다. 마지막으로 동료평가, 자기평가 점수의 차이와 학업성취도와의 관계를 분석하였을 때, 점수 차이와 학업성취도 사이에는 유의미한 상관관계가 없었다. 즉, 학업성취도가 높은 학생이든 낮은 학생이든 동료평가와 자기평가를 하는 경향성은 다르지 않았다. 이와 같은 분석 결과는 팀 기반 수업에서 학생평가가 개인별 평가에 활용될 수 있음을 보여준다. 자기평가 점수와 동료들로부터 받은 점수 사이에 높은 상관관계가 있는 것은 학생평가의 객관성을 나타낸다. 비록 자기평가 점수가 동료로부터 받은 점수보다 평균적으로 높은 것은 분명하지만 그것이 학년이나 과목에 따라서 또는 학업성취도에 따라서 달라지지 않으므로 객관성 면에서 더 활용가치가 높다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제49권1호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2010

In this paper, we study the effects of the Mathematical attitude and Disposition to the myself evaluation using the peer-evaluation feedback in in-group team teaching. For this purpose we construct a experimental class and then analyse the students' change in those aspects after applying peer-evaluation feedback made some significant changes on the students attitude in mathematics and Disposition. First, the results for this purpose on regarding the enhancement of mathematical attitude are effective. Second, the results on regarding the improvement of Disposition are effective.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.494-512
• /
• 2010

전 세계적으로 융복합 지향적 연구활동이 강화됨에 띠라 연구분야의 다양성과 새로운 연구분야의 개척은 물론 국가간 협력을 통한 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 이러한 새로운 형태의 연구가 계속 발굴되고 있는데 반해 그 연구를 정확히 평가하고 객관적으로 검증하는 방법에는 한계가 있는 현실이다. 동료평가(peer Review)만으로는 정확한 연구과제 평가가 제한적이라는 인식이 확대되고 있으나 이를 보완할 객관적인 평가방법의 제사는 아직 실증적으로 검증되지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 최근 새롭게 추진된 국가연구개발사업에 동료평가와 신규 계량지표에 의한 평가를 적용하여 그 결과의 반영비율 및 상관도를 측정하였다. 그 결과 계량지표의 적용이 실증적으로 유의미한 결과를 갖는 것으로 분석되었다.

• Safe Food
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.36-40
• /
• 2013