Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2022.23.2.107

A Study on Availabilities of Self-evaluation and Peer-evaluation of Team Activities in Computer Science Basic Classes  

Cho, Soosun (Major of Data Science, Korea National University of Transportation)
Publication Information
Journal of Internet Computing and Services / v.23, no.2, 2022 , pp. 107-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, availabilities of student-evaluations of team activities in the computer science basic classes were analysed. For the purpose, correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationships among peer-evaluation, self-evaluation, and academic achievement, and it was found that there was a statistically significant positive correlation among them. Moreover, the gap between peer-evaluation scores and self-evaluation scores was analyzed. When a one-sample t-test was performed, it was found that the gap was very significant. However, the size of the gap was not different between the two classes. That is, regardless of grade level, the students' self-evaluation scores tended to be on average higher than the evaluation scores received from peers. Finally, when analyzing the relationship between the gap in peer-evaluation and self-evaluation scores and academic achievement, there was no significant correlation between the gap in scores and academic achievement. In other words, there was no difference in the tendency of evaluation for students with high or low academic achievement. The results of the analysis shows the availability of student-evaluations of team activities in the evaluation of team-based instruction. The high correlation between self-evaluation and peer-evaluation indicates the objectivity of student-evaluation. Although it is clear that the self-evaluation score is higher on average than the score received from peers, it is more useful in terms of objectivity because it does not vary according to grade, subject, or academic achievement.
Keywords
Self-evaluation; Peer-evaluation; Academic Achievement; Team-based Instruction; Computer Engineering Education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Eun Bok Lee, Ok Hwa Lee, Soon Sun Jang, "The Feasibility Study of the Use of Self-evaluation and Peer-evaluation in a Computer Practice Class at Higher Education," Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, Vol.21, No.1, pp.65-89, 2015.   DOI
2 Hwang, Soon Hee. "Relationships between Peer- and Self-Evaluation in Team Based Learning Class for Engineering Students", Journal of Engineering Education Research, Vol.19, No.5, pp.3-12, 2016. https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO201631342684526.page   DOI
3 Dingel, M.J. et al., "Cooperative learning and peer evaluation: the effect of free riders on team performance and the relationship between course performance and peer evaluation", Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol.13, pp. 45-56, 2013. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/2133
4 Sungja Kim, "The Relationship and Evaluation Criteria of Self Evaluation and Peer Evaluation based on Team Contribution in Problem-Based Learning : A Case Study of classes of History Education in College", Educational Research, Vol.74, pp.71-94, 2019.   DOI
5 Reinholz, D., "The assessment cycle: a model for learning through peer assessment", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol.41, No.2, pp.301-315, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982   DOI
6 Zheng, L. et al., "Synchronous discussion between assessors and assesses in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awarenes and self-efficiency", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol.43, No.3, pp.1-15, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533   DOI
7 Herbert, N., "Peer assessment: is it fair?", Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, (formerly UniServe Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings), pp.62-68, 2012.
8 Bae, Youngji, "The Effects of Self-evaluation and Peer-evaluation on Academic Achievement and Mathematical Disposition," Master's thesis, Kookmin University, 2009.
9 Sadler, P. & Good, E., "The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning," Educational Assessment, 11(1) : 1-31, 2006. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1   DOI
10 Kang, Hyeon-Sook, "Perceptions on Peer Assessment in a University Elective Course," Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction Research, Vol.20, No.8, pp.167-189, 2020.
11 Boud, D. & Falchikov, N., "Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education", A critical analysis of findings. Higher education, Vol.18, No.5, pp.529-549, 1989. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00138746   DOI
12 Dochy, F..et al., "The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education", A review. Studies in Higher education, Vol.24, No.3, pp.331-350, 1999.   DOI