• 제목/요약/키워드: Ocean policy

검색결과 483건 처리시간 0.019초

국제 해양환경안전 이슈와 정책레짐 변화 (International Ocean Issues and Policy Regime)

  • 최성두
    • 해양환경안전학회지
    • /
    • 제12권2호
    • /
    • pp.115-123
    • /
    • 2006
  • 과거 해양자유와 개방적 자원사용 레짐은 오늘날 해양관리와 공유자원관리 레짐으로 변화하였다. 해양생물자원, 해양광물자원, 해양공간, 해로 등 해양자원은 경합성은 강하나 배제성은 약한 공유자원적 특성을 가지기 때문에 이를 방치하면 공유의 비극이 발생하며 따라서 합리적 해양관리가 필요하다. 주요한 국제 해양이슈는 해양오염 연안관리, 해수면상승, 어자원관리, 포경, 해양관할권, 심해저광물자원, 군사적 해양안보, 해적활동, 생태적 환경안보 등이 있으며, 이들에 대한 견고하고 지속적인 정책레짐이 형성되어 왔다. 이 논문은 오늘날 해양패러다임이 변화함에 따라 등장한 국제적 해양환경안전 이슈들과, 이를 해결하기 위한 정책레짐의 형성, 그리고 향후 바람직한 정책레짐 형성과제 등에 대해 국제정치학 또는 국제정책형성론적 시각에서 거시적으로 고찰하는데 그 목적이 있다.

  • PDF

미국 해양정책의 최근 동향과 해양환경 보전정책 방향 (Recent Trends in U.S. Ocean Policy and the Direction of Ocean Environment Conservation Policy)

  • 김형섭;이원호
    • 한국해양학회지:바다
    • /
    • 제27권4호
    • /
    • pp.211-228
    • /
    • 2022
  • 2010년 이후 미국 정부의 연속 3대에 걸친 행정부 문서 일부에 나타난 핵심 단어를 통해 미국 해양정책의 최근 동향을 간략히 파악하여 보았다. 많은 핵심 단어들은 3대의 행정부 사이에서 달라지지 않은 채로 동일하게 사용되고 있어, 해양정책의 확고한 근간은 쉽사리 흔들리지 않고 있음을 시사하였다. 각 행정부마다 특징있게 추진한 주요 정책 가운데, 2010년의 연안 및 해양 공간 계획(CMSP), 2019년 해양지도 작성(Ocean Mapping), 2030년까지 영해 30% 보존이라는 2021년 목표 등에 대한 강조는 미국 해양환경 보전정책의 방향에 중대한 영향을 미칠 것이다. 행정부 3대에 걸쳐 나타난 미국 해양정책 주요 키워드의 장기적인 경향과 시사점은 세계 해양환경 보전정책의 미래 전망과 이에 상응하는 한국의 정책에도 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 확인하였다.

우리나라 외교정책과 해양‧수산분야 협력방안에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Maritime and Fisheries Sector for the Implementation of an Diplomacy Strategy)

  • 박성욱;이주아;차정미
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제45권1호
    • /
    • pp.23-31
    • /
    • 2023
  • The core of the foreign policy of the Yoon Suk-yeol government is the promotion of active economic and security diplomacy as indicated in Policy Tasks No. 98. To this end, economic consultative bodies such as Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement(RCEP), Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), and Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) are taking the initiative to respond to the formation of supply chain, human rights, environment, and digital-related norms, and actively support Korean companies' overseas expansion. Due to the nature of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF) as an organization established centered on the space of the ocean, the MOF faces difficulties in bringing the functions of other ministries into the space of the ocean. Considering the vision, objectives, and detailed plans of the MOF, the contribution of the MOF in the field of active economic security, one of the main foreign policies of the Yoon Suk-yeol government, is perhaps too obvious. However, since the re-launch of the MOF, the ODA budget for the oceans and fisheries sector is too small compared to other ministries, so even if new policy demands are discovered, there are many difficulties in implementing these policies in practice. Recognizing these problems, this paper examines the background and contents of foreign policies that have been promoted for the efficient promotion of RCEP, CPTPP and IPEF and introduces the areas of cooperation in the oceans and fisheries sector in these foreign policies.

일본의 해양 정책 - 태평양 도서국과의 관계를 중심으로 (Ocean Policy of Japan: Focusing on the Relations with Pacific Island Nations)

  • 현대송
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제35권4호
    • /
    • pp.355-371
    • /
    • 2013
  • The purpose of this study is to explore the history of the relationships between Japan and the Pacific Island Nations in the context of its ocean policy, and to survey the current situation. Particularly, this paper inquires into how Japan's maritime policy, nuclear policy, and official development assistance policy have affected relationships with countries in this region. Firstly, this paper gives a brief overview of the socio-political situations of Pacific Island Nations. Secondly, the history of the 'Southward Advance Theory' adopted as national policy by Japan in the Meiji era is summarized. Thirdly, how Japan successfully re-entered this region despite conflicts surrounding the nuclear issue after the Second World War is explored. Lastly, this paper investigates how official development assistance and PALM (Pacific Island Leaders Meeting) helped to develop relations between Japan and the Pacific Island Nations.

국내외 해양생명공학 산업시장의 장기예측 및 함의 (Long-term Outlook and Implications of the Marine Biotechnology Market in Korea and Abroad)

  • 장덕희;강길모;채기영;김수지;조민주;차정미;함현경
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제35권2호
    • /
    • pp.93-105
    • /
    • 2013
  • The marine biotechnology industry is very significant as compared to other industries as one of the driving forces for economic growth in the next generation in Korea. However, the marine biotechnology market has been considered as a component of the biotechnology industry market which made difficult for creating separate research areas in relation to the scope of the relevant industry market as well as making it difficult to establish its own R&D policy strategies. Accordingly, this study was executed to estimate the future long-term market value of the marine biotechnology within the limit of industrial field and to verify the importance of national R&D investment in marine biotechnology on the basis of estimations within the industrial perspective. To this end, we classified the marine biotechnology industry into the four sub-sectors and estimated the domestic and global industrial market in 2010 and 2024. According to the results, the domestic and global market of the marine biotechnology industry will see a remarkable growth by 2024. In particular, the bio-energy, pharmaceutical and functional foods industry markets will achieve astonishing advances. On the basis of the analysis results, Korea has to establish more progressive and aggressive R&D investment strategies to strengthen national competitiveness through the marine biotechnology industry.

일본의 해양기본법 제정과 우리의 대응방안 연구 -한중일 해양행정체계 비교를 중심으로- (A Study on the Analysis of Japan's Basic Ocean Law and Policy of Korea -The Case of Korea, Japan and China on the Administrative System for Ocean-)

  • 박성욱;양희철
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제30권1호
    • /
    • pp.119-128
    • /
    • 2008
  • Japan's new Basic Ocean Law took effect in 20 July 2007. This law contains that 1) calls for the consolidation of eight government offices that previously worked separately on maritime issues; 2) establishes a basic plan for maritime matters, and; 3) creates a comprehensive maritime policy headquarters, run by the Prime Minister. The result is a structure for the integrated promotion of maritime policy. The Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has been appointed to the newly established position of maritime minister. Japan has been in conflict with Korea and China over EEZ and territory, which has caused the country to turn to ocean. If Japan puts more emphasis on sea, it will be on a collision course with neighboring countries such as Korea, China, Russia, and Taiwan. Japan has been at odds with these countries; with Korea over Dokdo islets, with China over the Senkaku Islands and the East China Sea, where gas fields lie, with Taiwan over fishery rights in the East China Sea, with Russia over the Kuril Islands. Korea's position about the establishment of Japan's new Basic Ocean Law is followed: 1) expression of Korea's position in maritime resourcces of east china sea, 2) understand of strategy for maritime resources development and maritime delimitation in China and Japan, 3) a caution for extention of EEZ and maritime activities, 4)effective and comprehensive policy establishment, and strength in R&D, 5) construction of active and responsive system for maritime issues in neighbor country.

중국(中國)의 해양관리조직(組織)과 해양정책(政策) 고찰 (A Study on China's Maritime Organization and Ocean Policy)

  • 김주형;김민종
    • 한국항해항만학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국항해항만학회 2009년도 추계학술대회
    • /
    • pp.281-282
    • /
    • 2009
  • 중국의 해양관리조직은 소위, 섭해5룡으로 대변되는 바와 같이 조직이 복잡하고 방대하여 여러 가지 비효율성과 문제점을 노출시기고 있는 것이 현실이다. 그러나, 중국지도부의 해양에 대한 중요성 인식과 일관된 정책으로 인하여 장차 통합해양관리조직의 출현을 예견해 볼 수 있으며 이를 통해 해양대국으로 발전할 가능성이 높다. 따라서 황해를 마주하고 있는 인접국인 우리나라는 이러한 중국의 해양정책의 방향을 면밀히 분석하고 예측하여 미래에 대용하는 자세가 필요하고, 더 나아가 일본, 러시아 등 주변국들의 해양정책에 대비한 중 장기 해양정책의 마련이 시급하다.

  • PDF

국가 해양보호구역 지정규모에 관한 국제비교 연구 (Research of International Comparison about Ranging the Marines Protected Areas (MPA))

  • 장덕희;이창열;조은영
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제44권4호
    • /
    • pp.339-353
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this research is to conduct an empirical analysis regarding Korea's 'Marine Protected Areas (MPA)' from an international comparative perspective. The authors would like to present the policy direction of marine protected areas based on the result of the research. The result of this study can be summarized in the following manner: First, the total designated size of marine protected areas in Korea is very small compared to the sizes of other OECD nations . Second, while some nations have expanded the extent of marine protected areas in accordance with international agreements and criteria, Korea has not done so. Accordingly, we propose the designated dimensions of marine protected areas should be constantly expanded to keep pace with international trends.

미국 해양기반기후해법 법안(Ocean Based Climate Solution Act, OBCSA)의 검토와 국내 해양기후변화 법제에 대한 시사점 (A Review of a Bill on the Ocean-Based Climate Solution Act (OBCSA) in the U.S and Implications for the Ocean Climate Change-Related Legal System in Korea)

  • 윤소라;이문숙
    • Ocean and Polar Research
    • /
    • 제45권2호
    • /
    • pp.71-87
    • /
    • 2023
  • Climate change causes ocean warming, ocean acidification, sea-level rise, dynamic coastal risk, change of ecosystem structure and function, and degradation of ecosystem services. Not only that, but it has negatively impacted the well-being of people, society, and culture, including food security, water resources, water quality, livelihood, health, welfare, infrastructure, transport, tourism, recreation, and so on, especially by particularly degrading indigenous communities and generating an inequitable distribution of benefits and costs. As pointed out here, these adverse impacts of climate change on the ocean have been emphasized at the international and national levels. In contrast, the ocean field has been neglected in the climate change conversation for too long. However, since the UNFCCC COP 25, the ocean has been drawn into the discussion as a solution to address climate change. Moreover, the U.S. Congress recently unveiled a bill called the 'Ocean-Based Climate Solution Act, OBCSA' that reflects the new paradigm of the international regime. The comprehensive legislative bill includes elements related to climate inequity, a blue economy, and a community-led bottom-up policy mechanism, which will have a significant bearing on the ocean-climate legal system. Therefore, this study reviews the OBCSA and deduces implications with regard to the ocean-climate legal system in Korea.