Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2022022

Research of International Comparison about Ranging the Marines Protected Areas (MPA)  

Duckhee, Jang (Ocean Law and Policy Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology)
Changyoul, Lee (Ocean Law and Policy Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology)
Eun-Young, Cho (Department of Law, Chung-Ang University, Graduate School)
Publication Information
Ocean and Polar Research / v.44, no.4, 2022 , pp. 339-353 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to conduct an empirical analysis regarding Korea's 'Marine Protected Areas (MPA)' from an international comparative perspective. The authors would like to present the policy direction of marine protected areas based on the result of the research. The result of this study can be summarized in the following manner: First, the total designated size of marine protected areas in Korea is very small compared to the sizes of other OECD nations . Second, while some nations have expanded the extent of marine protected areas in accordance with international agreements and criteria, Korea has not done so. Accordingly, we propose the designated dimensions of marine protected areas should be constantly expanded to keep pace with international trends.
Keywords
MPA; empirical analysis; OECD; comparative research;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Alphandery P, Fortier A (2001) Can a territorial policy be based on science alone? The system for creating the Natura 2000 network in France. Sociol Ruralis 41(3):311-328   DOI
2 Alvarez Malvido M., Lazaro C, De Lamo X, Juffe-Bignoli D, Cao R, Bueno P, Sofrony C, Maretti C, Guerra F (2021) Latin America and the caribbean protected planet report 2020. Red-Parques, UNEP-WCMC, WCPA-IUCN, WWF, CONANP and IAPA Project, Mexico, Cambridge, Gland, Bogota, 27 p
3 Bastian O (2013) The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol Indic 24:12-22   DOI
4 Blicharska M, Orlikowska EH, Roberge JM, GrodzinskaJurczak M (2016) Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: a review of research about the Natura 2000 network. Biol Conserv 199:110-122   DOI
5 Davies K, Murchie AA, Kerr V, Lundquist C (2018) The evolution of marine protected area planning in Aotearoa New Zealand: reflections on participation and process. Mar Policy 93:113-127   DOI
6 Dudley N (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, 86 p
7 Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Willis TJ, Kininmonth S, Baker SC, Banks S, Barrett NS, Becerro MA, Bernard ATF, Berkhout J et al (2014) Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506(7487):216-220   DOI
8 Gantioler S, Rayment M, ten Brink P, McConville A, Kettunen M, Bassi S (2014) The costs and socio-economic benefits associated with the Natura 2000 network. IJS Soc 6(1-2):135-157
9 Global Ocean Alliance (2022) https://www.gov.uk/government/topical-events/global-ocean-alliance-30by30-initiative Accessed 6 May 2022
10 Goote M (1997) The Jakarta Mandate on marine and coastal biological diversity. IJMCL 12(3):377-389
11 Hill LS, Johnson JA, Adamowski J (2016) Meeting Aichi Target 11: equity considerations in marine protected areas design. Ocean Coast Manage 134:112-119   DOI
12 Humphreys J, Herbert RJ (2018) Marine protected areas: Science, policy & management. ECSA 215:215-218
13 Leenhardt P, Cazalet B, Salvat B, Claudet J, Feral F (2013) The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: conservation or geopolitics? Ocean Coast Manage 85:112-118   DOI
14 Maestro M, Perez-Cayeiro ML, Chica-Ruiz JA, Reyes H (2019) Marine protected areas in the 21st century: current situation and trends. Ocean Coast Manage 171:28-36   DOI
15 Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21(6):1433-1444   DOI
16 Mucher CA, Hennekens SM, Bunce RG, Schaminee JH, Schaepman ME (2009) Modelling the spatial distribution of Natura 2000 habitats across Europe. Landscape Urban Plan 92(2):148-159   DOI
17 Protected Planet (2021) https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/ thematic-areas/marine-protected-areas Accessed 16 Dec 2021
18 O'Leary BC, Ban NC, Fernandez M, Friedlander AM, GarciaBorboroglu P, Golbuu Y, Guidetti P, Harris JM, Hawkins JP, Langlois T et al (2018) Addressing criticisms of largescale marine protected areas. Bioscience 68(5):359-370   DOI
19 OECD Statistics (2021) https://stats.oecd.org/# Accessed 16 Dec 2021
20 OSPAR (2019) 2018 Status report on the OSPAR network of marine protected areas. OSPAR Commission, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Series, 73 p
21 Rasheed AR (2020) Marine protected areas and human wellbeing - a systematic review and recommendations. Ecosystem Services 41:101048. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019. 101048   DOI
22 Trochet A, Schmeller D (2013) Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network to cover threatened species. Nature Conservation 4: 35-53. doi:10.3897/natureconservation.4.3626   DOI
23 UNEP-WCMC (2019). User manual for the world database on protected areas and world database on other effective area-based conservation measures: 1.6. https://www.ibatalliance.org/pdf/wdpa_manual.pdf Accessed 16 Dec 2021
24 Heo HY (2020) A review on the international trends for establishing post-2020 national targets relevant to protected areas - Focused on the CBD decisions and aichi target-11 achievement status -. J Ecol Environ 34(6):601-609