Ocean and Polar Research

Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (한국해양과학기술원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research of International Comparison about Ranging the Marines Protected Areas (MPA)

국가 해양보호구역 지정규모에 관한 국제비교 연구

  • Duckhee, Jang (Ocean Law and Policy Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Changyoul, Lee (Ocean Law and Policy Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Eun-Young, Cho (Department of Law, Chung-Ang University, Graduate School)
  • 장덕희 (한국해양과학기술원 해양법.정책연구소) ;
  • 이창열 (한국해양과학기술원 해양법.정책연구소) ;
  • 조은영 (중앙대학교 일반대학원 법학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.15
  • Accepted : 2022.10.04
  • Published : 2022.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to conduct an empirical analysis regarding Korea's 'Marine Protected Areas (MPA)' from an international comparative perspective. The authors would like to present the policy direction of marine protected areas based on the result of the research. The result of this study can be summarized in the following manner: First, the total designated size of marine protected areas in Korea is very small compared to the sizes of other OECD nations . Second, while some nations have expanded the extent of marine protected areas in accordance with international agreements and criteria, Korea has not done so. Accordingly, we propose the designated dimensions of marine protected areas should be constantly expanded to keep pace with international trends.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2022년 한국해양과학기술원 주요사업인 해양 공간 통합관리 연구(PEA0043)의 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Alphandery P, Fortier A (2001) Can a territorial policy be based on science alone? The system for creating the Natura 2000 network in France. Sociol Ruralis 41(3):311-328 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00185
  2. Alvarez Malvido M., Lazaro C, De Lamo X, Juffe-Bignoli D, Cao R, Bueno P, Sofrony C, Maretti C, Guerra F (2021) Latin America and the caribbean protected planet report 2020. Red-Parques, UNEP-WCMC, WCPA-IUCN, WWF, CONANP and IAPA Project, Mexico, Cambridge, Gland, Bogota, 27 p
  3. Bastian O (2013) The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol Indic 24:12-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016
  4. Blicharska M, Orlikowska EH, Roberge JM, GrodzinskaJurczak M (2016) Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: a review of research about the Natura 2000 network. Biol Conserv 199:110-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.007
  5. Davies K, Murchie AA, Kerr V, Lundquist C (2018) The evolution of marine protected area planning in Aotearoa New Zealand: reflections on participation and process. Mar Policy 93:113-127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.025
  6. Dudley N (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, 86 p
  7. Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Willis TJ, Kininmonth S, Baker SC, Banks S, Barrett NS, Becerro MA, Bernard ATF, Berkhout J et al (2014) Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506(7487):216-220 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13022
  8. Gantioler S, Rayment M, ten Brink P, McConville A, Kettunen M, Bassi S (2014) The costs and socio-economic benefits associated with the Natura 2000 network. IJS Soc 6(1-2):135-157
  9. Global Ocean Alliance (2022) https://www.gov.uk/government/topical-events/global-ocean-alliance-30by30-initiative Accessed 6 May 2022
  10. Goote M (1997) The Jakarta Mandate on marine and coastal biological diversity. IJMCL 12(3):377-389
  11. Hill LS, Johnson JA, Adamowski J (2016) Meeting Aichi Target 11: equity considerations in marine protected areas design. Ocean Coast Manage 134:112-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.017
  12. Humphreys J, Herbert RJ (2018) Marine protected areas: Science, policy & management. ECSA 215:215-218
  13. Leenhardt P, Cazalet B, Salvat B, Claudet J, Feral F (2013) The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: conservation or geopolitics? Ocean Coast Manage 85:112-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.08.013
  14. Maestro M, Perez-Cayeiro ML, Chica-Ruiz JA, Reyes H (2019) Marine protected areas in the 21st century: current situation and trends. Ocean Coast Manage 171:28-36 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.008
  15. Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21(6):1433-1444 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00831.x
  16. Mucher CA, Hennekens SM, Bunce RG, Schaminee JH, Schaepman ME (2009) Modelling the spatial distribution of Natura 2000 habitats across Europe. Landscape Urban Plan 92(2):148-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.04.003
  17. O'Leary BC, Ban NC, Fernandez M, Friedlander AM, GarciaBorboroglu P, Golbuu Y, Guidetti P, Harris JM, Hawkins JP, Langlois T et al (2018) Addressing criticisms of largescale marine protected areas. Bioscience 68(5):359-370 https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy021
  18. OECD Statistics (2021) https://stats.oecd.org/# Accessed 16 Dec 2021
  19. OSPAR (2019) 2018 Status report on the OSPAR network of marine protected areas. OSPAR Commission, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Series, 73 p
  20. Protected Planet (2021) https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/ thematic-areas/marine-protected-areas Accessed 16 Dec 2021
  21. Rasheed AR (2020) Marine protected areas and human wellbeing - a systematic review and recommendations. Ecosystem Services 41:101048. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019. 101048
  22. Trochet A, Schmeller D (2013) Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network to cover threatened species. Nature Conservation 4: 35-53. doi:10.3897/natureconservation.4.3626
  23. UNEP-WCMC (2019). User manual for the world database on protected areas and world database on other effective area-based conservation measures: 1.6. https://www.ibatalliance.org/pdf/wdpa_manual.pdf Accessed 16 Dec 2021
  24. Heo HY (2020) A review on the international trends for establishing post-2020 national targets relevant to protected areas - Focused on the CBD decisions and aichi target-11 achievement status -. J Ecol Environ 34(6):601-609