• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.87-113
• /
• 2007

For the realization of the national self-defense, the trend of the defense R&D projects becomes global and diverse with the increase of their budget. Thus, for the effective execution of the budget and the successful performance of the projects, the importance of selection, management and evaluation of the R&D projects is emphasized. This study suggests the applicability of a meta-evaluation model for the realization of the successful defense R&D project evaluation system. This study focused on the development of the meta-evaluation model design which can be applicable to the national defense R&D projects. Using the proposed meta-evaluation model, we propose a technique to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the national defense R&D projects evaluation system.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.106-123
• /
• 2019

Demand for performance analysis is increasing for efficient use of limited budgets such as improving investment efficiency and strategic budget allocation in accordance with the continuous increase demand of R&D budget for developing advanced weapon systems in the future battlefields. In accordance with the Act on the Performance Evaluation and Performance Management of the National R&D Projects established in March 2006, the performance analysis has been conducted for the systematic management and utilization of the R&D project performance. It was recognized as a project to achieve self-defense through strengthening the weapons system development capability, however, efficiency evaluation of Defense R&D projects was not much emphasized. Research on the efficiency analysis of defense R&D projects has been conducted in recent years, but most studies focused on corporate efficiency and productivity of defense companies. In this study, we analyzed the three-stage performance of defence R&D projects based on the logical model using the data envelope analysis(DEA) model. We also analyzed performance analysis from various perspectives through R&D type, technology classification and performance model. This study is expected to help defense department improve defense R&D projects and make decision.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.149-177
• /
• 2009

최근의 전쟁양상은 과거의 전쟁과는 확연히 구분되어 첨단 정보 과학전 능력이 전쟁의 승패를 결정짓는다. 전쟁양상의 변화에 따라 각 국가들이 국방력 강화를 위해 추구해야할 요소들 또한 변화되었다. 또한, 북한을 비롯한 중국과 일본의 첨단 군사력 증강은 동북아 지역의 패권 경쟁을 예고하고 있으며 향후 우리 안보정세에 있어서의 심각한 위협 요인으로 대두되고 있다. 따라서 미래 전에 대비한 첨단 기술소요를 선별하여 전략적 차원에서 집중 개발함으로써 신기술, 신개념의 미래첨단 무기 개발능력을 확보하여 자주국방을 수립하기 위한 기반을 시급하다. 이를 위해, 본 연구에서는 국방연구개발 역량 강화하여 핵심기술의 개발 및 선진기술 추격을 위한 전략적 R&D 거버넌스를 구축하고자 한다. 본 연구는 크게 세 가지로 나누어 볼 수 있는데, 첫 번째로 기술 추격형 국방연구개발 사업의 R&D 거버넌스모형 수립을 위한 기존 거버넌스에 관한 이론연구이다. 기존 거버넌스 연구는 공통문제 해결 기제로서의 거버넌스, 정부 관련 공통문제 해결기제로서의 거버넌스, 신 거버넌스의 측면으로 나누어 살펴보았다. 두 번째는 국방연구개발 전략 수립을 위한 R&D 거버넌스 핵심 프로세스를 통한 전략제시이다. 이는 전략적 의지를 통한 국방연구개발 사업 결정, 핵심기술 지식기반 확충, 개방형 국방연구개발을 위한 유기적인 조직체계 구축, 국방연구개발 프로젝트관리 방안 측면에서 분석해보았다. 세 번째는 R&D 거버넌스 전략모형과 T-50 사례분석이다. T-50 사례는 기초연구 단계, 탐색개발 단계, 체계개발 단계 별로 본 연구에서 제시하는 R&D 거버넌스 전략모형에 비추어 사례분석을 실시하였다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.123-152
• /
• 2007

The striking characteristic of the contemporary global security environment is that the nature of threats has become diverse and complex. For example, transnational and non-military threats including terrorism and proliferation of weapon of mass destruction has increased. In this security environment, Advanced countries funnel their investments for defense budgets into the assurance of key force capability and R&D of cutting-edge core technologies, in consideration of future battlefield environments so as to get an edge on not only defense science and technology but also intelligence capabilities. As shown by past practices of the korea's defense acquisition, the ministry of national defense has tried to enhance its force capabilities in the short-term by purchasing foreign weapon systems rather than by investing in domestic R&D. Accordingly, the technological gaps between the korea and advanced countries were widened due to both insufficient investment in development of domestic technologies and avoidance of technological transfer by advanced countries. Thus, for the effective execution of the R&D budget and the successful performance of the projects, the importance of selection, management and evaluation of the R&D projects is emphasized. So, The objective of this study is that the analysis of the proposal-selection evaluation system for the realization of the successful defense core technology R&D projects. This study focused on the improvement of the proposal-selection evaluation model which can be applicable to the national defense core R&D projects. Using the improved proposal-selection evaluation system, we propose a model to enhance the reliability of the national defense core technology R&D project evaluation system.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.223-244
• /
• 2009

Defense R&D is an essential investment for the national security. Recently our nation has also begun to initiate a number of defense R&D projects. As a lot of fund and resources are allocated to these projects, we need to identify which projects to initiate and then how to manage these projects well. Though there have been a number of studies on R&D projects in commercial sector, there are only a few studies in defense R&D sector. Moreover, these existing defense R&D studies mainly deal with the former issues, which are occurring at the stage of project planing. We are more concerned with project management issues, such as how to manage projects that had already been evaluated to undertake at the planning stage. Specifically our study aims to identify project management factors leading to the success of defense R&D projects. Results of the empirical analysis indicate that management support, user-driven requirements management, and project planning capability are key elements for project performance.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.70-79
• /
• 2009

Currently, the investment on Research and Development(R&D) for defense core technology is continuously increasing to maintain advanced country's R&D level. In accordance with this trend, the national defense R&D investment management system is being more strengthening, and importance of performance evaluation is being emphasized more and more. However, the existing indicators of performance evaluation for defense core technology R&D is limited in efficient management because of the qualitative evaluation items and subjective allocation of points. In this paper, we developed a novel indicator for defense core technology R&D performance evaluation through domestic and foreign related literature and inquiry, brainstorming, and analysis techniques by Stepwise Multiple linear Regression(SMR) and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). And we verified effectiveness of proposed indicators of performance evaluation by comparing with the existing evaluation indicators. Our proposed indicators for performance evaluation will create superiority performance on defense R&D fields.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.96-108
• /
• 2008

This paper proposes the systematic design approach for developing the evaluation indicators that evaluate the candidate proposals in the national defense core-technology R&D projects. To improve the validity and fairness of the evaluation indicators, the existing evaluation process in a military and a public sector are surveyed and also the existing evaluation system of the core-technology R&D programs for the national defense is analysed and discussed. A new system for the evaluation indicators is designed by using the axiomatic design, factor analysis and the analytic hierarchy process. It is expected that the proposed evaluation indicators contribute to enhance the fairness and the reliability of the evaluation process for the proposal of the national defense core-technology R&D projects.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.55-62
• /
• 2010

Currently, cost estimation is very important to the government acquisition programs to support decisions about funding and to evaluate resource requirement as key decision points. Parametric cost estimating models have been used extensively to obtain appropriate cost estimates in early acquisition phase. However, they have many restrictions to ensure the cost estimating result in Korean defense environment because they are developed in the U.S.A. environment. In order to obtain a good R&D cost estimate, developing our own CERs (Cost Estimation Relationships) using historical R&D data is essential. Nevertheless, there has been little research to develop our own CERs. In this research, we established a CER development process and found some cost drivers in the historical movement weapon system R&D data. The R&D CER is developed using the PCR(Principle Component Regression) method to remove multicollinearity among data and to overcome the restriction of the insufficient number of sample. At least, this research is meaningful as a first attempt in terms of defining the CER development process and obtaining our own R&D CER based on the historical data in Korean weapon system R&D environment.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.79-89
• /
• 2007

This study suggests the applicability of an AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) to improve the validity and fairness of evaluation index to assess the defense core-technology R&D projects. This study focused on the design of the proposal and performance evaluation index to structure them into a hierarchy using AHP which can be applicable to take the opinion of the defense R&D experts. Using the refined evaluation index, we propose a technique to enhance the reliability of the defense R&D projects evaluation system.

• 산업진흥연구
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.37-44
• /
• 2020

현재 방위산업 R&D 특성이 반영되지 못한 지체상금 제도를 적용하고 있어 방산업체의 경영악화 및 전력화 지연 등 문제가 되고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 방위산업 R&D 특성이 반영된 지체상금 제도 개선방안을 연구하여 방위 산업 발전과 효율적으로 전투력 증강을 추진하는데 기여하기 위한 것이다. 연구는 방위산업 R&D 특성, 국가 R&D, 지체상금율, 감면 및 면제 절차와 기존연구를 분석하였다. 그리고 지체상금 부과 실태 및 지체 원인분석 등을 기초로 델파이 기법을 적용하여 개선방안을 연구하였다. 최신 기술이 적용되어 성공여부가 불투명한 방위산업 R&D에 상용품 '제조·구매' 기준을 적용하는 것은 적절하지 않은 것으로 연구되었다. 연구결과 지체 발생 방지 방안으로 우수 기술 보유 업체 선정 등 4개의 방안과 지체가 발생 시 합리적 처리를 위해 지체상금 경감 및 차등 적용 등 3개의 방안이 도출되었다. 방위산업 R&D의 특성으로 인해 방위사업법에 의해서 업무가 진행되는 것처럼 마찬가지로 지체상금 제도도 방위산업 R&D 특성이 반영된 제도로 개선한다면 방위산업은 발전하게 될 것이고, 효율적이고 경제적인 무기체계 획득에도 기여할 것으로 사료된다.