• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.929-938
• /
• 1999

We propose a criterion for testing homogeneity of diagonal covariance matrices of K multivariate normal populations. It is based on a factorization of usual likelihood ratio intended to propose and develop a criterion that makes use of properties of structures of the diagonal convariance matrices. The criterion then leads to a simple test as well as to an accurate asymptotic distribution of the test statistic via general result by Box (1949).

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.519-527
• /
• 2004

Relationship between the partial likelihood ratio statistics for logisitic models and the partial goodness-of-fit statistics for corresponding log-linear models is discussed. This paper shows how definitions of suppression in logistic model can be adapted for log-linear model and how they are related to confounding in terms of collapsibility for categorical data. Several $2{times}2{times}2$ contingency tables are illustrated.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.38-49
• /
• 1987

Experimenters often want to test whether a specific treatment is really better than the others. In such a problem we derive the likelihood ratio test and compare the result with other multiple comparisons procedures. A nonparametric procedure based on ranks is also considered. Pitman efficiency of the rank-sum procedure relative to the likelihood ratio test is computed.

• 한국전자파학회논문지
• /
• 제22권10호
• /
• pp.960-965
• /
• 2011

본 논문은 maximum likelihood(ML) 기반의 모노 펄스 monopulse ratio(MR) 커브에 대한 수학식 유도 과정을 보인다. 이를 위해 선형 배열 안테나를 가정하고 얻어진 수학식이 배열 소자의 수, 배열 간격의 함수가 됨을 보인다. 시뮬레이션을 통해서 얻어진 수학식이 MR 커브와 동일함을 보이고, 얻어진 복잡한 수학식을 하나의 tangent 함수로 근사화할 수 있음을 보인다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제55권2호
• /
• pp.193-208
• /
• 2016

This study analyzes the likelihood principle and elicits an educational implication. As a result of analysis, this study shows that Frequentist and Bayesian interpret the principle differently by assigning different role to that principle from each other. While frequentist regards the principle as 'the principle forming a basis for statistical inference using the likelihood ratio' through considering the likelihood as a direct tool for statistical inference, Bayesian looks upon the principle as 'the principle providing a basis for statistical inference using the posterior probability' by looking at the likelihood as a means for updating. Despite this distinction between two methods of statistical inference, two statistics schools get clues to compromise in a regard of using frequency prior probability. According to this result, this study suggests the statistics education that is a help to building of students' critical eye by their comparing inferences based on likelihood and posterior probability in the learning and teaching of updating process from frequency prior probability to posterior probability.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• 제13권1_2호
• /
• pp.457-470
• /
• 2003

The comparison of two or more Lorenz curves of Pareto distributions of first kind under arbitrary order restriction is studied. The problem is turned out to be a statistical inference problem concerning scale parameters under order restriction. We assume that the location parameters of Palate distributions are completely unknown. In this paper the maximum likelihood estimation and likelihood ratio tests for and against order restriction are proposed.

• Journal of the Korean Statistical Society
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.205-216
• /
• 1996

The bootstrap calibration method for empirical likelihood is considered to make a confidence region for the regression coefficients. Asymptotic properties are studied regarding the coverage probability. Small sample simulation results reveal that the bootstrap calibration works quite well.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제20권5호
• /
• pp.417-425
• /
• 2013

We consider an extended version of a logarithmic series distribution and discuss the estimation of its parameters by the method of moments and the method of maximum likelihood. Test procedures are suggested to test the significance of the additional parameter of this distribution and all procedures are illustrated with the help of real life data sets. In addition, a simulation study is conducted to assess the performance of the estimators.

• International Journal of Reliability and Applications
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.31-52
• /
• 2008

In this paper generalized version of the geometric distribution is introduced. This distribution can be considered as a two-parameter generalization of the discrete geometric distribution. The main statistical and reliability properties of this distribution are discussed. Two methods of estimation, namely maximum likelihood method and the method of moments are used to estimate the parameters of this distribution. Simulation is utilized to calculate these estimates and to study some of their properties. Also, asymptotic confidence limits are established for the maximum likelihood estimates. Finally, the appropriateness of this new distribution for a set of real data, compared with the geometric distribution, is shown by using the likelihood ratio test and the Kolmogorove-Smirnove test.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.307-314
• /
• 2021

We showed that any missing mechanism is reproduced by EMAR or MNAR with equal fit for observed likelihood if there are non-negative solutions of maximum likelihood equations. This is a generalization of Molenberghs et al. (2008) and Jeon et al. (2019). Nonetheless, as MCAR becomes a nested model of MNAR, a natural question is whether or not MNAR and MCAR are testable by using the well-known three statistics, LR (Likelihood ratio), Wald, and Score test statistics. Through simulation studies, we compared these three statistics. We investigated to what extent the boundary solution affect tesing MCAR against MNAR, which is the only testable pair of missing mechanisms based on observed likelihood. We showed that all three statistics are useful as long as the boundary proximity is far from 1.