• Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.145-156
• /
• 2017

This study was conducted to grasp problems of the present and investigate the real condition of organizations by making how an organizational ISO/TS 16949 quality management system has a positive effect on process improvement, perceived organizational support has a significant effect on the relationship between ISO/TS 16949 requirements and process improvement, process improvement has a positive effect on customer satisfaction and organizational performance research projects. For doing them, it tris to suggest an effective application plan of ISO/TS 16949 certification through improvements about corporate quality management systems of the automobile field by investigating and analyzing literature of the precedent studies and ISO/TS 16949 certification effects actually, conducting and analyzing an survey on effects on customer satisfaction and organizational performance, and drawing the problems.

• Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.269-288
• /
• 2009

After enterprise get a certification in acquisition, the core requirements of ISO/TS 16949 standard is pull out the Performance Indicators by process access approach during the settlement and operation of system, and the pulled key performance indicators classified into the customer intention process, support process and management process and analyzed the effect to the management result. This study conducted with following step. Firstly, preceding research, the literature and investigation analysis about process approach method which is the special characteristics of ISO/TS 16949 standard. Secondly, each process of ISO/TS 16949 standard is classified and deduced the key performance indicators followed process access method. Finally, get a enterprise survey data related to improvement of Performance Indicator and analyzed by SPSS statistical software.

• Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.227-237
• /
• 2009

After enterprise get a certification in acquisition, the core requirements of ISO/TS 16949 standard is pull out the Performance Indicators by process access approach during the settlement and operation of system, and the pulled key performance indicators classified into the customer intention process, support process and management process and analyzed the effect to the management result. This study conducted with following step. Firstly, preceding research, the literature and investigation analysis about process approach method which is the special characteristics of ISO/TS 16949 standard. Secondly, each process of ISO/TS 16949 standard is classified and deduced the key performance indicators followed process access method. Finally, get a enterprise survey data related to improvement of Performance Indicator and analyzed by SPSS statistical software.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.381-388
• /
• 2006

많은 6시그마 혁신을 하는 기업 중에서 IS09000 시리즈나 IS0/TS16949 인증을 받고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 6시그마 도입 초기부터 ISO/TS16949와 통합운영을 생각하고 추진하는 곳은 많지 않다. ISO/TS16949에서는 기업전반의 프로세스에 많은 중점을 두고 있다. 그 중에서도 APQP(Advanced Product Quality Planning)은 제품 초기에서 부터 명확한 품질계획 업무 프로세스를 가지고 활동을 하라는 필수 프로세스를 요구하고 있다. 그러나 구체적인 Flow나 단계는 각 기업체의 특성에 맞기고 있다. 6시그마의 Lean DFSS는 이러한 제품개발 프로세스의 구체적인 전개단계를 제공 하고 있다. 여기에 APQP에 서 요건으로 명시한 각 프로세스 단계마다 인풋(Input)요소, 아웃풋(Output) 요소, 타켓(Target), 그 프로세스를 책임질 구성원, 핵심성공요인(KSF), 핵심성공지수(KPI), 단계마다의 FMEA(Failure Mode Effect Analysis) 분석을 대응하면 도입 초기에서 부터 상호 유기적이면서 효과적인 System이 된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Reliability Society Conference
• /
• 2004.07a
• /
• pp.249-261
• /
• 2004

Many of companies all over the world have been certified ISO 9000 which is customer focused since last ten 10 years, and industrial sector specific certifications have been developed, such as QS-9000 and ISO/TS 16949 which are specific requirements added to ISO 9000 for the automotive industrial sector. Requirements addressed in ISO 9000, QS-9000 and ISO/TS 16949 are considered to be significant. And I think that requirements for reliability elements such as Design FMEA, Process FMEA and Gage R＆R are very important. I sincerely hope that my study for requirements for reliability elements to be helpful to individual, companies and related association. There should be a lot of requirements in related with reliability in other industrial sectors and I am planning to study on it continuously.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
• /
• 2006.04a
• /
• pp.456-460
• /
• 2006

많은 6시그마 혁신을 하는 기업 중에서 ISO9000 시리즈나 ISO/TS16949 인증을 받고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 6시그마 도입 초기부터 ISO/TS16949와 통합운영을 생각하고 추진하는 곳은 많지 않다. ISO/TS16949에서는 기업전반의 프로세스에 많은 중점을 두고 있다. 그 중에서도 APQP(Advanced Product Quality Planning)은 제품 초기에서부터 명확한 품질계획 업무 프로세스를 가지고 활동을 하라는 필수 프로세스를 요구하고 있다. 그러나 구체적인 Flow나 단계는 각 기업체의 특성에 맞기고 있다. 6시그마의 Lean DFSS는 이러한 제품개발 프로세스의 구체적인 전계단계를 제공하고 있다 여기에 APQP에서 요건으로 명시한 각 프로세스 단계마다 Input요소, Output요소, Target, 그 프로세스를 책임질 구성원, 핵심성공요인, 핵심성공지수, 단계마다의 FMEA(Failure Mode Effect Analysis) 분석을 대응하면 도입 초기에서부터 상호 유기적이면서 효과적인 System이 된다.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.173-187
• /
• 2007

Many 6-sigma innovation companies are obtaining ISO9000 series or ISO/TS16949 certifications. However, not many of them have considered the integrated management of ISO/TS16949 at the time of 6-sigma introduction. ISO/TS16949 focuses on the process of an overall company. In particular, APQP (Advanced Product Quality Planning) requires that from the beginning all the planning should have a clear quality planning business process. Each company can decide the best course of action to suit its individual needs. Lean DFSS in 6-sigma offers the concrete development steps of the product development process. And if analyses of Input, Output, Target, Process, KSF, KPI, and FMEA is done in each process and clearly defined in APQP, mutual organic and effective systems can be initially achieved.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.124-127
• /
• 2006

IEC 60300 is an advanced Dependability Management System(DMS) designed for highly qualified company. ISO/TS 16949 is an Quality Management System enforced reliability activities. It is now hot issue how to set up and implement DMS. This paper presents an approach for implementing Dependability Management System(IEC 60300) based on Quality Management System(ISO/TS16949). We analyse the difference and relationship between these two systems, and suggest an quantitative method for evaluating DMS by introducing MIR(Maturity Index for Reliability). Finally we analyse the level of reliability activities in these systems by MIR.

• Journal of the korean Society of Automotive Engineers
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.19-27
• /
• 2002

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.22
• /
• pp.211-229
• /
• 2007

The ISO/TS16949 APQP goal of defect prevention and decrease of spread waste, is the customer satisfaction which leads a continuous improvement and profit creation. The quality expense where the most is caused by but with increase of production initial quality problem occurrence is increasing to is actuality. Like this confirmation amendment. with the problem which is forecast in the place development at the initial stage which it does completeness it does not confront not to be able, production phase to be imminent, the problem accumulates and it talks the development shedding of which occurs. In opposition, prediction confrontation. is forecast in development early stage to and it is a structure which does not occur a problem to production early stage. Like this development is a possibility of accomplishing competitive company from production phase. Which attains an goal of, chance cause it leads a APQP activity (common cause) with special cause prevention & detection the connection characteristic of the focus technique against a interaction is important. And the customer requirement satisfaction and must convert a APQP goal of attainment at the key characteristics action step. (1) The Prevention - with Design FMEA application prevention of the present design management/detection, (2) the Detection (prevention/detection) - with Process FMEA application prevention of the present process control/detection, (3) Special Cause - statistical process control (SPC) 4M cause spread removal, (4) Common Cause - statistical process control (SPC) the nothing zero defect which leads the continuous improvement back of spread with application it will be able to attain with application.