• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2014

As time passes, the aging of the plant building, the building's energy performance degradation than the initial plan does not express a situation could arise. This year, the certification of buildings certified in 2009 has expired for measures such as the situation required. In this study, management of national and international green building certification and re-certification was compared in two ways. First, the evaluation of green building certification system management assessments were compared. Second, the green building certification system for the re-certification analysis. As a result, G-SEED was not reflected life-cycle of building in management assessment and the commissioning of G-SEED is the UK and the U.S and other concepts of evaluation. In addition, the re-certification system is insufficient about substantial energy consumption of buildings. In this study, the revised the management assessments in conjunction with the re-certification system to manage the building is proposed to improve. In addition, the current evaluation of the existing building certification "existing building" and "building the first certified" as it is more efficient to separate the information into assessment was judged. Green building certification system to meet the purpose of management and operation, and disposal phases of the building to promote energy conservation and sustainability in order to the management a systematic and detailed evaluation and re-certification system developed for the revision of the specific items required and future research want to continue.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2016년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.261-262
• /
• 2016

In Korea, Green building certification system had been operated for more than 10 years and Expired certification buildings are ever-increasing. However, post management of building and qualification standard for re-certification(G-SEED) aren't exist, certificated green building don't have smoothly maintenance and management. Therefore, analysing the status and situation of similar system such as building maintenance and management, to suggest the direction of evaluation for green standard for energy and environmental design.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.83-90
• /
• 2012

Over the world, social demands and concerns of energy and resource depletions and environmental conservation have resulted in many researches and applications on sustainable development and construction. In order to support these demands and concerns, international green building certification systems such as LEED(Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and BREEAM(Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) were developed. In Korea, the green building certification system was introduced in 2000 and widely applied to all types of new buildings in order to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings on May, 2010. This paper investigates the importance of assessment criteria on multi-unit apartment projects among certification rating systems using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method and suggests a new direction on certification assessment standards. For applying the AHP method, the survey of staffs in green building certification consulting companies and architectural design companies was conducted via e-mail. As a result, criteria like energy, indoor environment, land use, pollution control, and ecological environment among 9 main ones turned out important on assessing green building certification at multi-unit apartment projects, while criteria like water resource, transportation, maintenance management, and material and resource did relatively unimportant.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제11권5호
• /
• pp.129-135
• /
• 2011

Many countries have carried out various policies about sustainable building to protect the earth against the global warming and environmental pollution. Korea government has also executed the Green Building Certification System. In order to keep the performances of certificated buildings sustainable, the effective building maintenance is quite necessary. Meanwhile, the foreign green building certification systems have considered the building maintenance as one of the most important items to keep the building performance effective. However, Green Building Certification Criteria(GBCC) of Korea has not had the sufficient criteria for the maintenance of green building. Therefore, The purpose of this study is to find direction for the improvement of management categories of Korea Green Building Certification Criteria. For this aim, GBCC was compared with the foreign certification systems such as LEED, BREEAM and CASBEE.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.16-25
• /
• 2014

최근 국가정책 아젠다인 '저탄소 녹색성장'은 국가의 중요한 비젼으로 전정부차원의 노력이 이루어지고 있다. 정부는 2020년까지 세계 7대, 2050년까지 세계 5대 녹색강국으로 진입을 목표로 하고 있다. 이러한 목표를 실현시키기 위해 효율적 온실가스 감축 및 녹색국토, 교통의 조성이 중요한 시책으로 추진되고 있다. 건설산업 부문도 예외가 아니어서 에너지 및 온실가스 배출저감을 위한 정책 및 기술개발이 활발히 이루어지고 있다. 해외 선진국의 경우 가장 광범위한 대상인 도로시설물에 대한 녹색도 측정을 위한 연구가 수행되었으며 그것을 기반으로 녹색도로인증제가 적용되고 있다. 본 논문은 선진국 제도 및 사례를 벤치마킹하고 국내 도로부문에 있어 적용성을 검증하여 녹색도로인증제도의 성공적인 국내 도입에 일조 하고자 한다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The green building certification system in Korea was introduced in 2002 and developed as an improvement version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013. This study conducts surveys targeting architectural designers and users on significance of certification assessment criteria for apartment buildings on the G-SEED system and examines the differential views between the two groups on assessment criteria. Method: First, The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method was used to find importance of assessment criteria and then the importances were compared with weighted points on the certification standard. Second, the t-test was used to investigate differential views between designer and user groups on certification assessment criteria based on drawn importances. Result: (1) While designer group considered land use and transportation, energy and environmental pollution, and water circulation management as more important, user group did material and resource, maintenance management, ecological environment, and indoor environment as more important. (2) Based on t-test results, sustainable energy, water circulation system, site management, habitat, acoustical environment, and light environment were found to be different on importance between the two groups.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2014

The building section is providing immediate causes for global climate change problems since it takes about 50% of carbon emission, 20~50% of waste discharge, 33% of energy consumption, 40% of resource use, and 17% of water consumption. So, many countries over the world have developed and implemented green building certification systems to assess sustainable performances of buildings since the early 1990s. In korea, the green building certification system to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings was first introduced in 2002 and developed as an improved version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013 after major revisions of related legislations. This research conducts a survey targeting residents on an apartment building that was certified as green building and examines the importance of assessment criteria on apartment buildings to certify green buildings using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method. And it proposes a new direction on certification assessment standards from the resident's prospective. As a result, assessment criteria such as indoor environment, ecological environment, energy & environment pollution, and maintenance management among 7 main ones turned out important on assessing the G-SEED system for apartment buildings, while criteria such as material & resource, water circulation management, and land use & transportation did relatively unimportant.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.52-62
• /
• 2013

친환경건축물인증 제도는 2002년 첫 시행 이후 2006년부터 인증 획득 실적이 급증하는 추세이며, 이러한 급증은 인센티브 부여, 법적 의무화, 광고효과 등을 통해 이득을 얻고자 하는 발주자가 증가하고 있는 것으로 판단되고 있다. 그러나 친환경건축물인증을 요구하는 발주자의 인증관련 제반 인식과 업무지식 및 역량이 미비한 관계로 인증획득을 위한 개별 의사결정시점과 검토내용을 파악하여 업무를 진행시키기보다 인증획득을 위한 최소한의 조건만을 만족시키고자 하는 발주자가 많은 실정이다. 본 연구는 이와 같은 현황인식에 기반을 두어, 발주자가 인증제도 업무를 명확히 파악하고 적시에 합리적인 의사결정을 수행할 수 있도록 지원하는 관리모델을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 친환경건축물인증 업무를 수행함에 있어서 주요 의사결정이 발생되는 지점들을 게이트웨이로 선정한 후, 시나리오 지향적 프로세스 모델 구현에 적합한 IDEF3 모델을 기반으로 하여 발주자의 업무 지원을 위한 관리체계를 구축하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 IDEF3 모델기반 관리체계는 단순한 기능분석 위주의 기존 IDEF0 모델의 한계를 극복함으로써 발주자의 인증업무 관련 수행역량 제고를 기대할 수 있을 것이다.

• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.53-61
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to suggest the way how to improve the school green building certification system based on life cycle assessment methodology and to assess $LCCO_2$ in outline. Green Building Certification System for School is comprised of 7 categories and 39 items. 7 categories include Land use and Transport, Energy and Atmosphere, Materials and Resources, Water, Management, Ecology, Indoor environmental quality. School is a public facility for students. So Green Building Certification System for School must have educational point of view adding to energy saving, reduction of greenhouse gas emission, etc. Also it needs to be classified into three categories ; kindergarten, elementar/middl/high school and university. Improvement plans for items are as follows ; energy consumption and $LCCO_2$ assessment considering life cycle, deletion or integration of duplicate items by comparing other systems, application of passive solar systems, consideration of the law and standards change, and selection of items considering specific building use.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.113-120
• /
• 2013

Many countries over the world have taken many discussions and endeavors on environmental improvements of energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions for solving global climate change problems. In Korea, pre-considerations of environment-conscious factors in buildings have been taken to be critical with new constructions and renovation markets. In this situation, the Korean Green Building Certification(KGBC) system to induce the diffusion of sustainable buildings was introduced in 2002 and developed as an improved version of the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) system in 2013 after major revisions. This research examines the importance of assessment criteria on apartment buildings to certify green buildings using the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method and suggests a new direction on certification assessment standards from the AHP result. In order to apply the AHP method, the survey via e-mail was conducted to design staffs in domestic architectural firms. As a result, assessment criteria such as ecological environment, indoor environment, and energy & environment pollution among 7 main ones proved to be important on assessing the G-SEED system for apartment buildings, while criteria such as land use & transportation, material & resource, water circulation management, maintenance management did relatively unimportant.