• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.314-328
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to establish a conceptual model of the course evaluations. in University. This paper has examined the course evaluations according to the levels, purposes, objects, and methods of them. And this paper has been classified for a conceptual model of the course evaluation. As the result of this analysis, four dimensions of course evaluation have been found. First, formative and summative evaluation have been found. The purposes of formative evaluation were improving quality of courses and collecting information for improvement of curriculum. The purposes of summative evaluation were offering informations on faculty staffing and improving of learning outcomes. Second, the levels of course evaluation were classified into university-level, professor-level, and student-level. Third, the objects of course evaluation were classified into analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Forth, the methods of course evaluation were classified into questionnaire, observation, interview, and content analysis. As a result of this analysis, 120 types of course evaluations have been found.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.81-92
• /
• 2014

This study suggests 5 evaluation criteria (safety and technology, environmental impact, economic feasibility, social factors, and institutional factors) and 24 evaluation indicators for a NFC (nuclear fuel cycle) derived using factor analysis. To do so, a survey using 1 on 1 interview was given to nuclear energy experts and local residents who live near nuclear power plants. In addition, by conducting a factor analysis, homogeneous evaluation indicators were grouped with the same evaluation criteria, and unnecessary evaluation criteria and evaluation indicators were dropped out. As a result of analyzing the weight of evaluation criteria with the sample of nuclear power experts and the general public, both sides recognized safety as the most important evaluation criterion, and the social factors such as public acceptance appeared to be ranked as more important evaluation criteria by the nuclear energy experts than the general public.

• Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.201-205
• /
• 2005

The aim of publishing the Korean Pharmaceutical Codex is to update and set specification of essential drugs for humane health. In accordance with speedy development of new drugs and improvement of science and technology, the need of revision of drug specification through the ICH guidelines and discussions between regulatory agency and pharmaceutical industry for the quality assurance of safer and efficient drugs is getting higher. The first edition of Korean Pharmaceutical Codex was published in 1983. Now, the third revision of the Codex is prepared because of the revision of domestic and foreign Pharmacopeias, changes of drug control environment, improvement of science and technology and so on. The aim of 3th edition is to improve the quality of essential drugs through the setting of the required specifications and discussions between the regulatory agency and pharmaceutical industry.

• 대한약학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한약학회 2002년도 Proceedings of the Convention of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea Vol.1
• /
• pp.219.1-219.1
• /
• 2002

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제4권4호
• /
• pp.1-25
• /
• 2009

정부는 '국가 연구개발 사업 등의 성과평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률'을 제정하여 국가연구개발 사업성과의 효율성과 생산성을 제고하기 위하여 노력하고 있다. 본 연구는 범정부적인 차원에서 수행하고 있는 국가 연구개발 사업 평가시스템 중 특정평가에 대하여 메타평가방법을 통한 효율성을 분석하기 위한 평가모형 및 지표를 개발한 결과이다. 국가 연구개발 사업 평가시스템의 효율성 분석을 위한 베타평가 모형은 평가 상황 요소, 평가자원요소, 평가수행요소, 평가결과요소, 평가활용요소 등 5개 구성요소로 구분하여 평가지표를 개발하였다. 아울러 평가항목을 선정하기 위하여 분석한 평가구성요소 및 평가지표에 대한 신뢰성 검증결과 Cronbach' $\alpha$ 계수가 0.933으로서 평가지표체계는 큰 무리가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 평가구성요소 및 평가지표별 가중치 산정은 계층분석기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 조사자의 전체 일관성 지수는 0.1 미만으로 나타나 조사자의 일관성이 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.1-24
• /
• 2003

This research investigates how teachers evaluate the School Comprehensive Evaluation administered by KEDI from 2000 to 2001. To provide basic data for improvement of the School Comprehensive Evaluation, the following six questions were asked: 1. What are the teachers' evaluations of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 2. What are the teachers' evaluations of the operation of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 3. What are the teachers' evaluations of the results of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 4. What are the teachers' evaluations of the effects of the School Comprehensive Evaluation? 5. What are the teachers' opinions regarding the problems of the School Comprehensive Evaluation and solutions to them? 6. What are the teachers' evaluations of the open classrooms and evaluators? 360 questionnaires were distributed to teachers who had been working at the Busan and Ulsan Metropolitan City schools taken the School Comprehensive Evaluation, and 258 questionnaires were processed by a SPSS WIN. The followings are major findings of the study: 1. The teachers evaluated the School Comprehensive Evaluation to be more desirable compared to the usual School Evaluation. 2. They recognized the need for preliminary training with extended time about the School Comprehensive Evaluation. They evaluated that the procedure and area of the evaluation were quite valid. 3. They evaluated the evaluation reports were objective but not leading changes in the respective schools. 4. The School Comprehensive Evaluation did not much contributed to the improvement of the schools. 5. Stress from interview and class observation was the major problem to the teachers. 6. The teachers did prepare for their open classes, but highly evaluated the evaluator's professionalism.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제39권6호
• /
• pp.695-706
• /
• 2019

This study conducted a case study on the process-centered evaluation competency of a middle-school/high-school science teacher using Teacher's Process-centered Evaluation Competency (T-PEC) measurement tool. The case analysis shows that teacher A in a middle school represents high competency of process-centered evaluation planning and cooperative communication while the competency of utilizing process-centered evaluation results is low owing to the characteristics of non-standardized areas. Teacher B in a high school shows high level of cooperative communication competency whereas low level of process-centered evaluation execution competency because the freedom given to students is not enough during the process of evaluation. The teacher also shows very low level of utilizing process-centered evaluation results due to the lack of time and the school culture not giving feedback to the students. According to cross-case analysis, teacher A and B both represent the highest level of collaborative communication competency and the lowest level of utilization process-centered evaluation results competency. And the lack of clear criteria for process-centered evaluation leads to different understanding of process-centered evaluation between the two teachers, and teacher B shows low the level of utilizing process-centered evaluation affects results due to the students not being concerned on feedback, security problem, and the reality focusing on the university entrance examination in high schools. Based on the results, this study suggests providing clear guidelines of process-centered evaluation to teachers, introducing an application in order to solve the time-lack problem pointed out as the biggest problem of process-centered evaluation, ensuring objectivity and security about process-centered evaluation results, and building the school culture such as the expanded application of standardized areas in order to implementing process-centered evaluation.

• Biomolecules & Therapeutics
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.659-664
• /
• 2017

Although lisdexamfetamine is used as a recreational drug, little research exists regarding its potential for dependence or its precise mechanisms of action. This study aims to evaluate the psychoactivity and dependence profile of lisdexamfetamine using conditioned place preference and self-administration paradigms in rodents. Additionally, biochemical techniques are used to assess alterations in the dopamine levels in striatal synaptosomes following administration of lisdexamfetamine. Lisdexamfetamine increased both conditioned place preference and self-administration. Moreover, after administration of the lisdexamfetamine, dopamine levels in the striatal synaptosomes were significantly increased. Although some modifications should be made to the analytical methods, performing high performance liquid chromatography studies on synaptosomes can aid in predicting dependence liability when studying new psychoactive substances in the future. Collectively, lisdexamfetamine has potential for dependence possible via dopaminergic pathway.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.113-136
• /
• 2009

국가 연구개발사업의 효율성과 생산성을 제고하기 위하여, 정부에서는 '국가연구개발사업 등의 성과 평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률'을 제정하여 정부 각 부처의 연구개발 사업 성과의 효율성을 증대시키고 있다. 본 논문은 국방연구개발사업 자체평가시스템 측면에서 메타평가를 실시하기 위하여 요인분석(Factor Analysis)을 통한 계층분석적 의사결정기법(AHP, Analytic Hierarchy Process)을 사용한 평가지표를 개발한 결과이다. 국방연구개발사업의 메타평가를 위한 평가요소로서 평가상황, 평가투입, 평가수행, 평가결과 등 4요소로 구분하여 평가지표를 개발하였다. 평가항목 선정을 위하여 평가요소 및 평가지표간 요인분석을 실시하여 Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ 값을 측정한 결과, 평가상황요소는 0.877, 평가투입요소는 0.755, 평가결과요소는 0.792, 평가결과요소는 0.906으로 내적일관성을 고려한 신뢰성은 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 평가요소 및 평가항목별 가중치 산정은 AHP기법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 조사자의 전체 일관성 지수는 0.09로 조사자의 일관성은 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.229-235
• /
• 2021

제4차산업혁명의 핵심기술 중의 하나로 인식되고 있는 블록체인은 인터넷을 기반으로 중앙집중적인 제어가 없이도 작동되는 자율적인 분산 정보관리시스템이다. 블록체인은 정보의 무결성, 신뢰성 등을 특징으로 하며, 이러한 특징을 필요로 하는 곳에는 블록체인을 활용할 수 있다. 대표적인 응용으로는 금융, 거래, 평가관리 등을 들 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 블록체인을 기반으로 사용자들이 자유롭게 평가개체(instance)를 생성하고 관리할 수 있는 평가관리시스템을 설계하였다. 평가관리자는 자신의 목적에 맞게 평가개체를 하나 생성하고, 평가항목과 평가자들을 배정할 수 있다. 평가자들이 평가항목에 대해서 평가를 마치면 평가관리자는 해당 평가개체에 대해서 평가 결과를 집계를 할 수 있다. 여러 용도로 평가를 시행하고 싶지만 평가시스템을 갖추지 못한 경우에 본 시스템을 이용하면 이를 비교적 간단히 평가시스템을 구현할 수 있다. 또한 블록체인의 특성으로 인하여 평가자들은 자신이 이미 기록한 평가 값을 수정하지 못하며, 시스템 관리자 또는 평가 관리자 역시 평가 값을 수정하지 못한다. 이런 이유로 평가의 신뢰성은 높아진다고 볼 수 있다.