Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Developing a Conceptual Model of Course Evaluation in University

대학 수업평가의 개념모형 개발

  • Received : 2006.10.18
  • Accepted : 2006.12.08
  • Published : 2006.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish a conceptual model of the course evaluations. in University. This paper has examined the course evaluations according to the levels, purposes, objects, and methods of them. And this paper has been classified for a conceptual model of the course evaluation. As the result of this analysis, four dimensions of course evaluation have been found. First, formative and summative evaluation have been found. The purposes of formative evaluation were improving quality of courses and collecting information for improvement of curriculum. The purposes of summative evaluation were offering informations on faculty staffing and improving of learning outcomes. Second, the levels of course evaluation were classified into university-level, professor-level, and student-level. Third, the objects of course evaluation were classified into analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Forth, the methods of course evaluation were classified into questionnaire, observation, interview, and content analysis. As a result of this analysis, 120 types of course evaluations have been found.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명화, 강의평가 자료분석을 통한 강의 평가지 개선방안, 교육문제연구 16, pp.81-101, 2002
  2. 김성수, 강의평가의 신뢰도, 타당도 및 활용에 대한 고찰, 인하대학교 학생생활연구 17, pp.85-100, 1997
  3. 김수선, 대학 강의평가의 구성요소에 대한 이론적 고찰 및 강의평가도구의 양호도에 대한 실증적 분석, 성균관대학교 석사학위논문, 2002
  4. 김충행, 수업방법 개선을 위한 학생에 의한 대학강의 평가의 분석, 교육과정연구 15(1), pp.203-240, 1997
  5. 류춘호, 강의평가 설문문항의 개발에 관한 연구, 경영연구 26, pp.339-389, 2001
  6. 류춘호.이정호, 강의평가와 관련한 의사결정요인에 관한 연구, 경영연구 27, pp.235-252, 2002
  7. 박명수, 미국 대학 교수업적평가제도 경영실태 분석, 중앙행정논문집 8(1), pp.5-59, 1994
  8. 박세훈, 미국대학에서의 변화에 대한 장애요인, 교육학연구 31(5), pp.279-291, 1993
  9. 박용수, 미디어 내용분석의 쟁점과 전망, 강원대학교 논문집 21, pp.3-14, 1991
  10. 배호순, 수업평가-수업효과 증대를 위한 평가적 접근, 서울: 양서원, 1991
  11. 손충기, 대학 수업에 대한 학생평가: 미국 대학의 연구동향과 한국 대학에의 시사점, 원광대학교 논문집 32(1), pp.147-188, 1996
  12. 원효헌, 교사수행평가의 이론적 기초, 안암교육연구 3(1), pp.121-142, 1997a
  13. 원효헌, 교사의 교수 수행평가 준거의 타당화 연구, 교육문제연구 3(1), pp.263-283, 1997b
  14. 유현숙. 미국의 고등교육 거버넌스 분석과 시사점, 교육행정학연구 22(4), pp.263-286, 2004
  15. 이상호, 내용분석법을 적용한 행정학연구논문의 비판적 검토, 한국행정학회 추계학술대회 발표논문집 24(1), pp.29-43, 2005
  16. 이성호, 교육과정과 평가, 서울: 양서원, 1992
  17. 이성흠, 교수설계이론에 근거한 대학 강의평가 도구개발을 위한 기초연구, 교육공학연구 17(1), pp.81-108, 2001
  18. 이정연, 대학 강의평가 문항의 이론적.실증적 분석-신뢰도와 타당도 분석을 통하여, 성균관대학교 석사학위논문, 2002
  19. 이종숙, 학생의 강의평가에 대한 기초연구, 교육연구 4, pp.1-24, 1995
  20. 정진식, 대학 강의평가 수행에 관한 연구, 한국비블리아 10, pp.93-115, 1999
  21. 지은림, 교수강의평가에 미치는 학생변인 효과, 경희대학교 교육문제연구소 논문집 12, pp.113-124, 1996
  22. 최관경.김영일, 교수 강의평가제에 관한 연구, 부산교육대학교논문집 29(1), pp.237- 295, 1993
  23. 최애숙, 효율적 대학수업 모형개발 연구, 교육발전논총 21(1), pp.83-104, 2000
  24. 최연욱, 대학 강의평가를 위한 문항 개발, 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문, 1995
  25. 최호성, 교육과정평가의 모형정립과 평가기준 설정 및 타당화, 경북대학교 박사학위논문, 1993
  26. 한신일, 대학생들의 서술형 강의평가내용 분석, 교육행정학연구 21(3), pp.359-378, 2003
  27. 허형, 학생에 의한 교수 강의평가척도 개발과 시행방안, 한국교육문제연구소 논문집 14, pp.23-45, 1999
  28. 홍성윤, 대학의 수업평가와 그 과제, 한국교육문제연구소 논문집 10, pp.15-30, 1995
  29. 황정규, 학교학습과 교육평가, 서울: 교육과학사, 2002
  30. Abrami, P.C. 'How should we use student ratings to evaluate teaching?' Research in Higher Education 30. pp.221-227, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992718
  31. Angelo, T.A., Cross, K.P. Classroom assessment techniques: a handbook for college teachers, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994
  32. Braskamp, L.A., Brandenburg, D.C., & Ory, J.C. Evaluationg teaching effectiveness, CA: Sage, 1984
  33. Broder, J.M. & Dorfman, J.H. 'Determinants of teaching quality: What's important to students?' Research in Higher Education 35(2), pp.235-249, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496703
  34. Bullock, C.D. 'Online collection of midterm student feedback' New Directions for Teaching and Learners 96, pp.95-102, 2003
  35. Burdsal, C.A., & Bardo, A.W. 'Measuring student's perceptions of teaching: Dimensions of evaluation' Educational and Psychological Measurement 46(1), pp.63-79, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164486461006
  36. Centra, J.A., Froh, R.C., Gray, P.J. & Lambert, L.M. A guide to evaluating teaching for promotion and tenure, New York: Syracuse University Center for Instructional Development, 1987
  37. Centra, J.A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993
  38. Centra, J.A., & Gaubats, N.B. 'Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching?' The Journal of Higher Education 70(1), pp.17-33, 2000
  39. Cohen, P.A. 'Effectiveness of Student Rating Feedback for Improving College Instruction: A Meta-Analysis of Findings' Research on Higher Education 13(4), pp.321-341, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976252
  40. Cohen, P.A. 'Student rating of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies' Review of Educational Research 51(3), pp.281-309, 1981 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051003281
  41. Dick, W., & Carey, L. The systematic design of instruction(4th ed.), NY: Haper Collins, 1996
  42. Feldman, K.A. 'The superior college teacher from the students' view', Research in Higher Education 5(3), pp.243-288, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991967
  43. Feldman, K.A. 'Effective college teaching from the students and faculty's view: Matched or mismatched priorities?' Research in Higher Education 28(4), pp. 291-344, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01006402
  44. Feldman, K.A. 'Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Effective from student ratings' In R.P.Perry & J.C.Smart(Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice, NY: Agathon, pp.368-395. 1997
  45. Holt, M.E. & Moore, A.B. 'Checking halfway: the value of midterm course evaluation' Evaluation Practice 13(1), pp.47-50, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(92)90024-6
  46. Jackson, D.L., Teal, C.R., Raines, S.J., Nansel, T.R., Force, R.C., & Burdsal, C.A. 'The domensions of students' perceptions of teaching effectiveness' Educational and Psychological Measurement 59(4), pp.580-596, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921970035
  47. Keutzer, C.S. 'Midterm evaluation of teaching provides helpful feedback to instructors' Teaching of Psychology 20(4), pp.238-240, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2004_12
  48. Kulik 'Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy' New Directions for Institutional Research 109, pp.9-25, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001
  49. Lee, J 'Midterm course surveys beneficial, but rare' The South's Liveliest College Newspaper, Friday October 15, 2004
  50. Marks, R.B. 'Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value' Journal of Marketing Education 22(2), pp.108-119, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475300222005
  51. Marsh, H.W 'SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching' British Journal of Educational Psychology 52(1), pp.77-95, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x
  52. Marsh, H.W 'Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research' International Journal of Educational Research 11. pp.253-388, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
  53. Marsh, H.W 'Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures' Journal of Educational Psychology 83(2), pp.285-296, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.285
  54. Marsh, H.W 'Weighting for the right criteria in the instructional development and effectiveness assessment(IDEA) system: Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives' Journal of Educational Psychology 86(4), pp.631-648, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.631
  55. Medley, D. Teacher Competency Testing and the Teacher Educator, Charlottesville: Association of Teacher Educator and the Bureau of Educational Research. Univ. of Virginia, 1982
  56. Overall, J.U., Marsh, H.W & Herbert, W. 'Midterm feedback from students: It's relationship to instructional improvement and students' cognitive and affective outcomes' Journal of Educational Psychology 71(6), pp.856-865, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.6.856
  57. Piper, D.W. The efficiency and effectiveness of teaching in higher education, Leicester. England: Gavendish press, 1978
  58. Remmers, H.H. 'The relationship between students' marks and students' attitudes toward instructors' School and Society 28, pp.759-760, 1928
  59. Remmers, H.H. 'To what extent do grades influence student ratings of instructors?' Journal of Educational Psychology 21, pp.314-316, 1930
  60. Seels, B.B., & Glasgow, A. Making instructional design decisions(2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, 1998
  61. Seldin, P. 'Evaluationg college teaching' In R.E.Young & K.E.Eble(Eds.), College teaching and learning: preparing for new commitments, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988
  62. Tuckman, B.W. Evaluation instructional programs(2nd ed.), Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon, 1985
  63. Wachtel, H.K. 'Student evaluations of university teaching: A cross-cultural perspective' Research in Higher Education 23(2), pp.191-212, 1998
  64. Stanford 대학교 홈페이지 http://www.stan ford.edu