• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.637-651
• /
• 2017

금융회사가 개인정보를 수집하기 위해서는 법률에 정해진 내용을 소비자에게 명시적으로 알리고 사전 동의를 받도록 되어 있다. 그 결과 금융상품이 복잡해지고 다양해짐에 따라 '개인정보제공 동의서' 내용도 복잡해지고 분량이 많아지게 되었다. 특히 인터넷과 모바일의 경우 화면 크기의 제약으로 글씨가 더 작아지면서 더욱 이해하기가 힘들어졌다. 이것은 개인정보를 수집하는 거의 모든 기업이 비슷한 상황이어서, 서비스를 이용하는 소비자 입장에서는 동의 내용을 이해못한 채 습관적으로 동의하는 모순이 생기고 있다. 본 연구에서는 금융회사 인터넷 홈페이지를 통한 합리적인 개인정보 수집 및 이용 동의 정책 수립 모델을 제시하기 위해 국내외 법제도를 고찰하여 문제점을 도출하고 개선 방안을 제시한다. 또 연구를 통해 선정된 평가요인을 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process)방법을 이용하여 의사결정 모델과 공식을 제시하고 검증한다.

• 반도체디스플레이기술학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.6-13
• /
• 2021

Cases and studies on the selection method of CTQ are relatively active, but there are few cases or studies on the selection method of CTP which is important in the device industry. In fact, many companies simply select and manage CTP from the point of contact based on their experience and intuition. The purpose of this study is to present an evaluation model and a mathematical decision model for rational and systematic CTP selection to improve the process quality of semiconductor equipment lines. In the evaluation model, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis technique was applied to show objective and quantitative figures, and Fuzzy decision-making model was used to solve the ambiguity and uncertainty in the decision-making process. Decision Value (DV) was presented. The subjects were 22 process factors managed in the Plating Process that the representative equipment line can do. As a result, the evaluation model proposed in this study can support more efficient and effective decision-making for process quality improvement by more objectively measuring the problem of subjective CTP selection in manufacturing sites.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.107-122
• /
• 2004

This study aims to examine the usefulness on the Evaluation Process for the Feasibility & Priority of A Certain Public Projects. and the Methodology used AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) which used pairwise comparisons of the alternatives and criteria for solving discrete alternative multicriteria decision problems. In this paper, we present a similar phenomenon, rank reversal problem, when we apply the AHP to group decision making process. The problem is identified by an example problem in that the previous rank order of Public Projects choices. we also present three different methods to prevent the undesirable characteristic of the original AHP in appling to Decision Making Process.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.53-73
• /
• 2002

The launch of a new business is crucial to the future growth and profitability of a company. A new business project typically requires a large amount of resources while it has a high possibility of failure. The evaluation of new business opportunities is therefore quite a critical decision-making to companies. This evaluation includes screening of a large number of criteria at a time which often makes desision-making very complicated. Management should evaluate the business alternatives in a sound and consistent manner that is hard to achieve because the new business evaluation is a typical semi/unstructured decision-making problem. The difficulty in such an evaluation will increase if it is required for management to consider both quantitative and qualitative criteria simultaneously. Under these circumstances, this study has proposed a decision-making framework that utilizes analytical hierarchy process(AHP). This study has identified a set of criteria essential to the new business evaluation and suggested a systematic framework for it. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are incorporated into the single framework in this study.

• 한국가스학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.52-58
• /
• 2016

그린 청정에너지인 LNG는 1969년 상업 생산을 시작한 이래로, 지속적인 수요증가로 LNG 플랜트 산업은 성장일로에 있으며, 많은 투자가 이루어지고 있다. LNG 플랜트 프로젝트의 진행단계는 타당성 검토 및 개념설계 단계, 기본설계 단계 (FEED, Front End Engineering Design), 그리고 플랜트 건설이 포함되는 상세설계 단계로 나누어진다. 사업투자 의사결정은 기본설계 완료시점과 상세설계의 시작 전에 이루어지는 것이 일반적이다. LNG 플랜트 프로젝트 추진 시, 경제성, 안정성, 생산성, 환경영향, 기술파급효과, 운전 및 정비 등 고려하여야 할 요인이 매우 다양하다. 아직까지 국내에서는 LNG 플랜트의 각 설계단계에 대한 효과적인 평가기법이 개발되어 있지 못하며, 다만 소수 경험자의 의견중시, 일부 기술 항목 비교 등 일부 요인에 대하여만 가중치를 부여하는 방법이 이용되고 있는 실정이다. 본 논문에서는 LNG플랜트 기본설계에 대한 평가를 통하여 상세설계단계로의 원활한 사업 이행을 위한 평가방법론을 제안 및 분석하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 제안하는, 기본설계 평가를 위한 영향변수인, 평가요소 및 세부요소 항목들에 대한 가중치 값의 설정 및 가중치 값들의 일관성 검증과정, 등급 배수 방법의 추가 적용하는 평가 방법론은, 다양한 산업분야에 실용적인 가이드라인이 될 것이다.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.460-468
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is propose an alternative for flight attendants to acquire equipment that could enhance the ability to adapt in flying conditions. Introducing and acquiring weapon system, such equipments should be deeply considered in multilateral aspects; reinforcements in the overall strategic status in the army, the ramifications that can contribute to military resources, and economic situations in the country. To do this, we first induced several criteria that can be used for evaluating alternatives. After that, we applied the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) approach to putting all factors into considerations in decision making for equipment acquirement. The results of this study are expected to have usefulness in formulating strategies and policies in selecting equipment acquisition alternatives for flight attendants.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.274-284
• /
• 2012

This study presents the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a potential decision-making method for obtaining the relative weights of alternatives through pairwise comparison in the context of hierarchical structure. The aim of this study was to elicit prior strategies for brand communication for Korean restaurants overseas. We created a questionnaire and surveyed experts at government agencies, restaurant companies, and universities from October to November 2011. By applying the pairwise comparison matrix, relevance was perceived as a more important strategy evaluation criteria than effectiveness or urgency. The highest-ranked strategy was the 'Identification of the BI and positioning of Korean restaurants' followed by 'Development of Korean food content for overseas promotion', 'Development of locally customized Korean food recipes and new Korean menus', 'Development of marketing communication strategies for Korean restaurants by countries', and 'Development of Korean restaurant differentiation strategies'. The results of this study can be used for effective Korean food globalization by enhancing the competitiveness in the world market.

• Fibers and Polymers
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.297-302
• /
• 2004

In many engineering applications, the final decision is based on the evaluation of a number of alternatives in terms of a number of criteria. This problem may become very intricate when the selection criteria are expressed in terms of different units or the pertinent data are difficult to be quantified. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is an effective way in dealing with such kind of complicated problems. Cotton fiber is selected or graded, in the spinning industries, based on several quality criteria. However, the existing selection or grading method based on Fiber quality Index (FqI) is rather crude and ambiguous. This paper presents a novel approach of cotton fiber selection using the AHP methodology of Multi Criteria Decision Making.

• 한국디지털건축인테리어학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.33-41
• /
• 2013

Considering the fact that quality of life(QOL) conceptually has objective and subjective attributes but difficulties in measuring the subjective aspect cause a number of studies not to be balanced, this study exploits AHP(Analytical Hierarchy Process) which has been used for systematic decision making to include the other aspect. As the first step of the process decision making hierarchy model is set by content analysis of the UNDP QOL index and additional review of previous studies. 'Improving urban QOL' is a goal on top, 'Economical QOL', 'Environmental QOL', 'Social QOL' and 'Physical QOL' are dimensions of sub-goal(means objectives), and further decomposition follows. AHP shows that the dimensions of economical, physical, environmental and social QOL scored higher respectively. The aim of the model is to measure and prioritize the urban QOL in the two case study cities. The final score of the each city could be computed by integration of relative weights of dimensions for urban QOL. The final score of QOL for city A was 0.6642 and for city B the figure decreased to 0.3358. The method of this study could be used in stages of the process of urban planning. First stage is when planners try to have a correct and reliable perspective from the existed conditions of the city. Second stage is when the projects should be investigated to be confirmed for their efficiency. In other words planners can direct the scarce resources towards the aspects of QOL which are more important. And the results revealed that using AHP creates opportunity to involving the different groups in the stage of criteria weighting so that the attitudes of local community could be integrated well to the decision making to be suitable for a new paradigm of participatory and communicative planning.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.127-135
• /
• 2008

하수관거 개량사업의 주된 목적은 Inflow/Infiltration (I/I)를 제거 및 통수능력 확보이다. 최근 노후 하수관거의 개 보수 및 신설 사업이 활발히 이루어지고 있으나 현재의 사업들은 관거 데이터의 부족, 유량 및 수질 자료의 장기적인 측정 미비 등으로 인하여 효율적인 사업을 진행시키기에 무리가 있다. 본 연구에서는 하수관거 개량사업을 보다 효율적으로 진행시키기 위하여 Rehabilitation Weighting Model (RWM)과 Rehabilitation Priority Model (RPM)로 구성된 의사결정모형을 개발하였다. RWM은 시간 및 예산상의 제약으로 인하여 주요 지점에서만 관측되는 I/I를 상류의 각 관거별로 I/I를 산정하며, 관거별 I/I는 Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)를 통하여 산정된 8개 결함항목별 가중치에 따라서 결정된다. RPM은 Genetic Algorithm (GA)를 이용하여 소유역별 최적개량우선순위를 산정한다. 이것은 공사 기간 중 발생하는 I/I를 최소화시키기 위한 소유역별 공사 순서를 설정함으로써 하수처리장의 처리비용을 절감시킴으로써 하수관거 개량사업의 효율적인 시행을 위한 판단 기준을 제시해준다.