• 한국학교ㆍ지역보건교육학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.45-59
• /
• 2014

Objectives: This study is designed to evaluate the influential factors of career decision-making self-efficacy and career identity by health science college students on their job preparation beaviors. Methods: The total 714 questionnaires were distributed to juniors and seniors of health science college, and the result was statistically analyzed through IBM SPSS statistics 20.0. Results: 1. There was no significant difference of job preparation behavior between male students and female students, and while seniors showed highly active job preparation behaviors, those who had high satisfaction level toward their major studies, high academic achievement, and outgoing personality had highly active job preparation behaviors. 2. Students with high satisfaction level toward their major studies, high academic achievement, outgoing personality, and high expected salaries showed high career decision-making self-efficacy level. 3. Students with high satisfaction level toward their major studies, high academic achievement and highly outgoing personality showed high level of career identity. 4. Subsidiary factors of career decision-making self-efficacy were collection of job information, goal setting, planning, and self-assessment, and all of them showed correlation with job preparation behaviors. 5. Among subsidiary factors of career decision-making self-efficacy, "self-understanding" and understanding of job information showed correlation with job preparation behaviors. Conclusion: For improvement on career decision-making self-efficacy and career identity of health science college students, individual support, psychological support, educational support and other supports regarding job employment to provide wide paths and methods for job preparation behaviors are essential, and through various job employment education program and graded counseling, job preparation behaviors shall be promoted as a great strategy.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.127-140
• /
• 2022

최근 액셀러레이터가 새로운 스타트업 육성 기관으로 주목받고 있다. 본 연구는 스타트업이 액셀러레이팅 프로그램을 이용하고자 액셀러레이터를 선택할 때 의사결정요인의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위를 AHP 기법을 이용해 실증 분석하였다. 그 결과 스타트업 창업자는 의사결정요인의 중요도를 자금지원 요인, 프로그램 요인, 액셀러레이터 특성 요인 순으로 인식하고 있었고, 세부 요인 간 상대적 중요도는 스타트업 창업자와 액셀러레이터 종사자 간, 사업장 소재지 및 매출실적 유무에 따라 인식의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 액셀러레이터의 자금지원 역량 강화와 스타트업의 니즈에 부합하는 맞춤형 서비스 향상의 필요성이 있음을 시사한다. 본 연구가 스타트업이 액셀러레이터를 선택할 때 의사결정기준으로 활용되고 액셀러레이팅 프로그램에 관한 추가 연구의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제10권5호
• /
• pp.1060-1064
• /
• 2009

본 논문에서는 수도권 대학생을 대상으로 한 Fuzzy AHP 기반의 이동통신사 신정을 위한 의사결정모델을 제안한다. 고객이 이동통신사를 선택할 때 이동통신사의 수많은 경쟁적인 그리고 상호보완적인 요소들로 인해 의사결정을 내리는 것이 용이하지 않다. 고객이 최적의 이동통신사를 결정하기 위해서는 요금, 다양한 서비스, 부가 기능 등과 같은 서로 다른 정량적 그리고 정성적 요소들을 고려할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 대학생들이 고객으로서 이동통신사를 선정할 때 다양한 정량적 그리고 정성적 요소들을 고려할 수 있는 퍼지 AHP 기반의 모델을 제안한다. 특히, 퍼지 이론은 불활성설과 애매모호한 문제를 다루기 위해 적용되고 또한 정량적 요인들을 피지수로 바꿀 수 있는 선형정규화 모델을 개발한다. 수도권 대학생들을 대상으로 한 사례 연구는 제안 모델의 유용성과 고객들이 이익을 위해 보다 나은 의사결정을 내릴 수 있도록 도와줄 수 있음을 보여준다.

• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.90-113
• /
• 2021

Electronic Records Management System (ERMS) is a computer program or set of applications that is utilized for keeping up to date records along with their storage. ERMS has been extensively utilized for enhancing the performance of academic institutions. The system assists in the planning and decision-making processes, which in turn enhances the competencies. However, although ERMS is significant in supporting the process of decision-making, the majority of organizations have failed to take an initiative to implement it, taking into account that are some implementing it without an appropriate framework, and thus resulted in the practice which does not meet the accepted standard. Therefore, this study identifies the factors influencing the adoption of ERMS among employees of HLI in Yemen and the role of such adoption in the decision-making process, using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) along with Technology, Organization and Environment (TOE) as the underpinning theories. The study conducts a cross-sectional survey with a questionnaire as the technique for data collection, distributed to 364 participants in various Yemeni public Higher Learning Institutions (HLI). Using AMOS as a statistical method, the findings revealed there are significant and positive relationships between technology factors (effort expectancy, performance expectancy, IT infrastructure and security), organizational factors (top management support, financial support, training, and policy),environmental factors (competitiveness pressure, facilitating conditions and trust) and behavioral intention to adopt ERMS, which in return has a significant relationship with the process of decision-making in HLI. The study also presents a variety of theoretical and empirical contributions that enrich the body of knowledge in the field of technology adoption and the electronic record's domain.

• 한국정보통신학회논문지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.841-848
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 스마트폰을 사용하는 사용자들이 의사결정에 어떤 요소를 통해 영향을 미치는지 탐구하는 것이었다. 본 연구는 친밀감/개인 연결성, 사용/의존성, 친숙함/전문성, 효능/효과, 자아정체성, 제어 등을 독립변수로 설정하고 의사결정은 종속 변수로 설정하였다. 본 연구에서는 스마트폰 사용자 200명을 설문지를 통해 수집·분석하였으며, 변수 간 영향을 파악하기 위해 WarpPLS를 사용하였다. 이 연구는 사용자의 심리적인 의사결정이 스마트 기기에 어떤 요인으로 영향을 미치며, 이를 통해 미래 산업의 발전과 스마트 기기를 사용하는 사용자들의 특성과 수용성을 파악할 수 있다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.304-315
• /
• 2016

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships of critical thinking disposition (CT), nursing work environment (NWE), and clinical decision making ability among nurses. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study design was conducted on 192 nurses who had worked for more than six months in five general hospitals. A self-reported questionnaire was used to collect data, which included demographics, CT, NWE, and clinical decision making ability. Results: The mean score of CT was 3.5. The highest score was on the objectivity of CT and the lowest on systematicity. The mean score of NWE was 2.3. The highest score was on the collegial nurse-physician relations of NWE and the lowest on the staffing and resource adequacy. The mean score of clinical decision making ability was 3.3. In hierarchical multiple regression, affecting factors on clinical decision making ability were CT and NWE. Conclusion: The findings showed that clinical decision making ability is associated with CT and NWE. To improve clinical decision making ability, it is important to improve CT. In addition, it should be considered to improve NWE where the nurses can make a decision with their job through critical thinking.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 6th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.620-621
• /
• 2015

In this study, the multi-criteria decision-making model based on Quality Function Deployment Method is proposed. Multicriteria decision-making is an attempt to link QFD method with the TOPSIS. By this effort, a model that makes client's decision-making more rational and objective in design phase is suggested. The multi-criteria decisionmaking model confirming to the Owner's requirements will improve the productivity of the construction industry and the satisfaction of the customer. Further study extending the range of the requirements, not only the Owner's requirement will be necessary to cover the various factors as much as possible. And then, finally as a flexible platform to achieve a sustainable quality management, web-based multi-criteria decision-making model can be utilized by the relevant stakeholders simultaneously with the feed-back and sharing the necessary informations.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.16-25
• /
• 2019

While various efforts are being made to ensure aviation safety, air accident rate induced by pilot human factors is still high worldwide. In particular, among pilot human factors, it would be the most important issue for pilots to anticipate and recognize flight environmental factors beyond their control and to make a positive decision making(ADM). In the Republic of Korea Air Force(ROKAF), there were many dizzying experiences induced by bird strike incidents and developed into dangerous moments such as damage to the aircraft and pilots' increased mental stress. It is a matter of serious concern in terms of safety management and human factors to dismiss bird strike incidents as inevitable misfortune due to environmental factors. In 2018, the ROKAF Aviation Safety Agency(ASA) conducted an experimental study to enhance pilots' ADM competence that can anticipate and avoid a bird strike. As the way of the study, 'Bird Strike Preventing Information' had been written and distributed every week by the ASA to flight units in the ROKAF during the period of the study. Through enhanced pilots' perceptual ADM competence, there was a noticeable number of reduction in bird strike incident compared to previous years of the experimental study.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제42권3호
• /
• pp.195-200
• /
• 2018

여객선은 선박사고가 발생을 하게 되면 인명의 피해로 직결되기 때문에 선장의 순간적인 결정이 매우 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 선박의 이상증후가 발생하였을 때 선박 및 승객대피 의사결정을 위한 주요요인을 정량적으로 분석하고 의사결정에 있어 기초 자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 8개의 주요요인에 대하여 전문가 설문조사를 실시하였으며 계층분석방법(Analytic Hierarchy Process: AHP)을 이용하여 가중치를 선정하고 우선순위를 결정하였다. 그 결과 가중치가 가장 높은 주요요인은 전복(횡경사 발생)이었으며, 그다음이 화재/폭발로서, 의사결정에 있어서 가장 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있다. 추후 세부 설문조사를 실시하여 유효수를 높여 신뢰도를 향상시킬 것이며, 본 결과는 선박과 승객대피 의사결정의 주요요인을 결정하는 기초자료로 활용 될 것이다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.367-376
• /
• 2009

This paper proposes an application methodology of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision making theory for improvement priority by assessment of various risk factors affecting on deterioration of water supply systems, as major social infrastructure. AHP method is organized with three level of hierarchy which is introduced for multi-criteria decision making in this study. In the first level, assessment outputs are calculated by AHP for each affecting factor. In the second level, criteria are estimated by using assessment results with respect to structural and environmental factors. Consequently, ranking decision is performed in the third level. In order to present the effectiveness, a proposed method is compared with FCP(Fuzzy Composite Programming) for decision making. Since the results of the proposed method show better performance with consistent results, it can be applied as an efficient information for the determination for improvement priority of the study infrastructure.