• 제목/요약/키워드: Content validity

검색결과 1,211건 처리시간 0.024초

한국어판 운동활동일지(Korean Version-Motor Activity Log) 번안과 내용타당도 연구 (Translation and Content Validity of the Korean Version of the Motor Activity Log)

  • 김수진;황수진
    • PNF and Movement
    • /
    • 제20권2호
    • /
    • pp.263-273
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: Translation and adaptation involve cross-cultural and conceptual aspects; they are not simply based on linguistic equivalence. This study aimed to produce a conceptually equivalent Korean version of the motor activity log (K-MAL) for the upper extremities that can be applied across the Korean population and its cultures. Methods: Following the procedures used in the translation of other cross-cultural evaluation tools, and the five steps of the translation process, the motor activity log (MAL) was translated into Korean (K-MAL). We then examined the content validity of the K-MAL. Twenty-two rehabilitation professionals (11 males and 11 females, mean length of clinical career = 101.54 months) assessed the content validity of the K-MAL. The content validity ratio and content validity index were used to verify the content validity. Results: There were inconsistencies found in three sub-items in the MAL during the forward translation process. These inconsistencies were corrected, and the complete K-MAL was produced. The exact critical values of the content validity ratio and the content validity index of the K-MAL were 0.45-0.95 and 0.77-1.00, respectively. Conclusion: The K-MAL was successfully developed using a systematic methodology, which included translation, adaptation, and evaluation of the content validity. We expect that stroke rehabilitation professionals working in both clinical and research settings will apply the K-MAL when evaluating the amount and quality of use of the upper extremities in post-stroke patients in Korea.

재가노인의 낙상위험요인 지식 측정도구 개발 (Development of a Knowledge Scale of Fall Risk Factors for Community-dwelling Older Adults)

  • 홍정민
    • 성인간호학회지
    • /
    • 제24권3호
    • /
    • pp.244-252
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose: The purpose of the study was to develop a knowledge scale of risk factors for fall among community-dwelling older adults. Further, the validity and reliability of the scale was developed. Methods: A preliminary scale was developed through content validity by five experts and targeted subjects using the CVI (Content Validity Index). Following the establishment of content validity, the scale was used with 359 community-dwelling older adults to further establish both validity and reliability of the scale. Specifically, construct validity using known-group comparison technique, and reliability using Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ were established. Results: After content validity testing, 44 preliminary items were selected. Construct validity was established by known group-comparison, in which scores between the fall and no fall groups were compared. The Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ of the final scale was .83. Conclusion: Reliability and validity of the scale were confirmed. This tool may be used for measuring knowledge of fall risk factor for the community-dwelling older adults.

시공단계 환경성능평가를 위한 평가항목의 내용타당성 검토 (Assessing Content Validity of Environmental Performance Indicators for Construction Sites)

  • 강고운;이상규;이명도;조훈희;강경인
    • 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 한국건축시공학회 2013년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회
    • /
    • pp.7-9
    • /
    • 2013
  • An assessment tool's validity is crucial because its scores are used as basis of decision making. This study assessed the content validity of the indicators for environmental assessment of construction activities. Pool of candidate indicators were constituted from the literature review, and CVR(Content Validity Rate) approach was adopted to investigate the content validity. As a result, 14 indicators are effective and five of them are content valid and retained from the pool.

  • PDF

한국형 소아 기능근력검사의 개발을 위한 내용타당도 검증 (Content Validity for a New Korean Version of Pediatric Functional Muscle Testing)

  • 서혜정;김중휘
    • 대한물리의학회지
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.103-114
    • /
    • 2016
  • PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was first to develop a Korean version of pediatric functional muscle testing for children with a motor developmental disorder who have a communication problem and who are aged below five years, and also to verify the content validity. METHODS: First, the preliminary study was conducted to verify the reliability of pediatric functional muscle testing, developed by Venita in Korea. Based on the results of the study, the primary evaluation items were selected and modified. Second, the first test of content validity was conducted through a panel discussion, and a second investigation of content validity was carried out by utilizing the Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI). In this study, we selected only 0.78 or more items from I-CVI. RESULTS: Based on the results of the preliminary study, 19 primary evaluation items were selected. Based on the results of the first and second content validity tests, 15 tertiary evaluation items for the Korean version of pediatric functional muscle testing were determined. CONCLUSION: This study developed a new Korean version of pediatric functional muscle testing and suggested that it will be a useful tool to measure muscle strength for Korean children with a motor developmental disorder and a communication problem, aged below five years.

학업 성취도 평가도구의 내용 타당도 분석 - 수학과 3-가를 중심으로- (An Analysis of Content Validity of Third-Grade Mathematics Achievement Tests)

  • 김은아;강완
    • 한국초등수학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제14권2호
    • /
    • pp.177-196
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구의 목적은 한국교육과정평가원(KICE) 제작 학업 성취도 평가 도구와 교사 제작 학업 성취도 평가 도구의 내용타당도를 분석 비교하는데 있으며, 학교 현장에서 실시되는 학업 성취도 평가 도구의 개선을 위한 기초 자료를 제시하는데 그 의의가 있다. 학업 성취도 평가 도구의 내용 타당도를 검증하기 위하여 행동차원별, 내용차원별로 수업목표와 평가목표의 비율차 검증을 하였다. 그 결과 교사 제작 수학과 3-가 학업 성취도 평가도구와 한국교육과정평가원(KICE)에서 제작한 3학년 국가수준 기초진단 학업 성취도 평가도구는 행동차원과 내용차원에서 모두 내용타당도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구는 교사 제작 학업 성취도 평가도구는 내용타당도는 높으나 평가 문항이 지식, 이해력, 적용력을 평가하는데 집중된 경향을 보여 창의력 신장을 위한 고등정신기능을 기르는 평가가 이루어지도록 평가 방법 개선 방안과 평가 도구 개발에 힘써야 할 것이며 각 학교간의 편차를 해소하기 위하여 많은 교사들의 상호 교류도 활발히 진행되어야 할 것임을 제언한다.

  • PDF

한국어판 예방접종에 대한 심리적 소인 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증 (The Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the 5C Psychological Antecedents of Vaccination Scale)

  • 배수연;김희주
    • 대한간호학회지
    • /
    • 제53권3호
    • /
    • pp.324-339
    • /
    • 2023
  • Purpose: This study aimed to valuate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 5C Psychological Antecedents of Vaccination (K-5C) scale. Methods: The English version of the 5C scale was translated into Korean, following the World Health Organization guidelines. Data were collected from 316 community-dwelling adults. Content validity was evaluated using the content validity index, while construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity was examined by assessing the correlation with vaccination attitude, and concurrent validity was evaluated by examining the association with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination status. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also evaluated. Results: Content validity results indicated an item-level content validity index ranging from .83 to 1, and scale-level content validity index, averaging method was .95. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the fit of the measurement model, comprising a five-factor structure with a 15-item questionnaire (RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .05, CFI = .97, TLI = .96). Convergent validity was acceptable with a significant correlation between each sub-scale of the 5C scale and vaccination attitude. In concurrent validity evaluation, confidence, constraints, and collective responsibility of the 5C scale were significant independent predictors of the current COVID-19 vaccination status. Cronbach's alpha for each subscale ranged from .78 to .88, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for each subscale ranged from .67 to .89. Conclusion: The Korean version of the 5C scale is a valid and reliable tool to assess the psychological antecedents of vaccination among Korean adults.

영유아를 위한 한국형 우식위험관리 평가도구의 내용 타당도 검증 (Content Validity of the Korean Version of Caries Management By Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) for Children Aged 0-5)

  • 강유민;여안나;이수영
    • 대한통합의학회지
    • /
    • 제7권1호
    • /
    • pp.47-56
    • /
    • 2019
  • Purpose: The present study confirms the content validity and understanding level of the questions of the Korean version of caries management by risk assessment (CAMBRA). Methods: To develop the Korean version of CAMBRA for children aged 0-5 years, a series of steps were followed: first, translation and reverse-translation processes were conducted by an expert committee. To establish content validity, CAMBRA was modified to adapt to the conditions in Korea by 17 dental hygiene professionals with a master's or a higher degree. The responses were analyzed using analysis of frequency and descriptive statistics. Content validity was verified by calculating the content validity index (CVI). The survey was administered to 64 mothers and caregivers to assess the understanding level of questions of the Korean version of CAMBRA. Results: Content validity of each of the items showed an S-CVI/AVE value of 0.79, but the content validities varied from 0.63 to 1.0. The understanding level of each question was between 3.56 and 4.46, thus showing favorable results. Conclusion: It was concluded that the test items verified for content validity were suitable for assessing caries risk for children of ages 0-5 years. This study would contribute to improving children's oral health and disease prevention by providing timely intervention.

노년층의 인지-화용언어 능력 평가 : 평가도구 및 내용타당도 연구 (Cognitive-Pragmatic Language Assessment for Normal Aging : Study of Assessment Tools and Content Validity)

  • 이미숙;김향희
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제12권5호
    • /
    • pp.280-292
    • /
    • 2012
  • 인간의 인지-화용언어 능력은 일반적으로 연령이 증가함에 따라 저하된다. 노년층의 인지-화용언어 능력을 평가하는 것은 인지 기능이나 치매 등 관련 질병들에 대한 예측에 도움이 된다. 본 연구에서는 노년층의 인지-화용언어 능력을 평가하기 위한 기존의 도구들을 분석하고, 현재 저자들이 연구 개발 중인 평가영역 및 문항들에 대한 내용타당도(content validity)를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 17명의 언어치료사 및 임상심리사들이 판단한 척도점수에 근거하여 내용타당도 지수(Content Validity Index, CVI)를 산정하였다. 연구 결과, 주의력, 기억력, 조직화 능력, 추론력, 문제해결력, 집행기능, 화용언어 등 7개 영역 모두 CVI가 .75를 초과하였다. 이에 따라, 현 문항들이 노년층의 인지-화용언어 능력을 평가하기 위한 목적과 적절히 부합하는 내용적 타당성을 지니는 것으로 입증되었다.

Reliability and Validity of the Korean version of the Pain in Older Adults Knowledge Survey (K-POAKS) among Nurses Who Have Worked in Long-term Care Hospitals

  • Ryu, Young Seun;Park, Jeong Sook
    • 지역사회간호학회지
    • /
    • 제31권2호
    • /
    • pp.130-142
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Pain in Older Adults Knowledge Survey (K-POAKS) to assess knowledge of pain in older adults including people with dementia for use in long-term care hospital nurses. Methods: Survey data were collected from a convenience sample of 179 nurses who have worked in long-term care hospitals in B, D and U cities. The Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 for internal consistency for test reliability was conducted. The content, criterion-related and construct validity were evaluated using SPSS/WIN 22.0. Results: The KR 20 was .75 and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) was a range of 0.84~1.00. The criterion-related validity was positively correlated with attitudes (r=.28, p<.001) and performance (r=.21, p=.004). The construct validity of K-POAKS was analyzed by conducting the principal component method using the exploratory factor analysis varimax rotation, and seven factors were derived above the eigenvalue of 1.0. The seven factors explained 58.5% of the total variation. Conclusion: The Korean version of the POAKS showed satisfactory internal reliability, content validity, criterion-related validity and construct validity. These results suggest that the K-POAKS could be used as a suitable tool to measure the knowledge of the aged people's pain, including that of dementia patients for long-term care hospital nurses.

모유수유 적응 측정 도구 개발 (Development of a Breast Feeding Adaptation Scale (BFAS))

  • 김선희
    • 대한간호학회지
    • /
    • 제39권2호
    • /
    • pp.259-269
    • /
    • 2009
  • Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a breast feeding adaptation scale (BFAS) to evaluate adaptation to breastfeeding for breastfeeding mothers and their infants and to test the validity and reliability of the instrument. Methods: The study was conducted as follows: application of the conceptual framework, identification of the content domains, items generation, and test of validity and reliability. In order to test validity and reliability, two panels of experts reviewed items and subcategories of the preliminary questionnaire and then data were collected from 329 mothers who were up to 4 weeks postpartum and breastfeeding. Descriptive statistics, t-test, factor analysis, and Cronbach's alpha were used to analyze the data. Results: The conceptual framework was based on the Roy adaptation model. The content domains were developed via literature review, review of instruments, and data acquired from the interviews of breastfeeding mothers and nurses. A total of 69 items belonging to 8 domains were generated. A reduction to 44 preliminary items was accomplished through content validity analysis. Factor analysis extracted 8 factors with a total of 27 items on a 5-point Likert scale. Content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability of the BFAS were established. Conclusion: The newly developed BFAS is a reliable and valid instrument with which the adaptation of breastfeeding mothers and their infants to the breastfeeding behavior can be evaluated.