• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.31 no.4
• /
• pp.325-329
• /
• 2009

Objective : This is to report the effectiveness of intraoral distraction osteogenesis, iliac bone graft for alveolar augmentation in the extremely atrophied alveolar defects after infected allobone grafted area. Subjects and Methods : Anterior segmental osteotomy was performed and the trans-oral alveolar distractors (Martin, Germany) were applied in patient with the severe acquired anterior mandibular and mandibular defect after ameloblastoma enucleation. Iliac bone grafts were performed in defect sites and distraction osteogenesis were treated. After latent period for 1 week, the osteomized alveolar segments were distracted by 0.75 mm a day (0.25 mm/1 turn) for 10 days The consolidation period was about 12 weeks. Thereafter, 2 titanium threaded implants were simultaneously installed with removal of distractor. For oral rehabilitiation, The implants were installed in maxilla, mandible. It was tested with clinically and radiographically. Results : Amounts of acquired alveolar bone were 10 mm with the increased width of the ridge crests and soft tissue expansion. Dental implants installated on the augmented alveolar ridges in 12 weeks after distraction were confirmed as in good osseointegration and in good function without any complications. Conclusion : Intraoral distraction osteogenesis can be a good option for alveolar ridge augmentation of the severely atrophied ridges and soft-tissue defects.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.312-321
• /
• 2007

Purpose: Distraction osteogenesis has been applied to the maxillofacial implantology and good experimental and clinical results have been reported. However, histologic studies of implants placement on distraction osteogenesis of atrophic alveolar ridges are scarce. In this study, we compare the bone formation between in the transport part and in the distraction part by histomorphometric analysis. Materials & methods: Three adult beagle dogs were served as experimental subjects. The 2 premolars and 1st molar were extracted on the Lt. side of mandible in each beagle dog. After one month later, osteotomy was performed and distraction device was adapted. Distraction was performed with gradual incremental separation of two bone pieces at a rate of 1.0mm per day for 5 days. During consolidation phase, new bone was formed in the distraction zone between the separated bone pieces. 5 weeks after distraction phase, 3 implants were placed in each beagle dog. The implants were inserted through transport part and distraction part and inferior basal bone. The animals were sacrificed at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after implant placement. BIC and BA of implants on distraction part and transport part were measured histomorphometrically. Results: BIC, BA increased after implant placement as time goes by passes and new bone formation was slightly higher in transport part than in distraction part at 2 weeks, 4 weeks after implant placement. At 12 weeks after implant placement, BIC, BA of were 74%, 61% in transport part and 77%, 59% in distraction part, therefore there were no difference in BIC and BA between transport part and distraction part at 12 weeks after implant placement.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.45 no.1
• /
• pp.107-118
• /
• 2007

Statement of problem: Implant-type distractor uses a removable distraction device that has an appearance similar to that of a dental implant and utilizes many of the same techniques for placement as are used for dental implants. Material and method: In this study, 48 implant type titanium distractors were inserted into the osteotomized alveolar bone of 12 beagle dogs. After a 7-day latency period, the alveolar bone was augmented by 5mm vertically at a rate of 1.0 mm/day. The dogs were sacrificed after 4weeks, 8weeks and 12 weeks for radiographic, histologic, and histomorphometric analysis. Result: Copper equivalent value showed significant difference between 4 weeks and the other weeks(8, 12 weeks)(p<0.05). But there was no significant difference between maxillary and mandibular groups. In the bone to metal contact analysis, there was a significant difference between 4 weeks and 12 weeks(p<0.05). On the contrary, there was no significant difference between maxilla and mandible. The bone area showed significantly higher values in 12 weeks compared to 4 weeks(p<0.05). Histologically mineralization began at the host bone margins. At 12 weeks, increasing accumulation of $Ca^{++}$ element was confirmed. Conclusion: From the results above, the new bone formation was increased according to consolidation period. Especially there was significant difference between 4 weeks and 12 weeks(p<0.05). Implant type distractors used in this study to augment vertical ridge defect may prove to be a clinically useful treatment option in selected cases.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.37 no.5
• /
• pp.421-428
• /
• 2011

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical result of vertical alveolar distraction, especially the distracted alveolar bone and installed implants. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients who have been received the vertical alveolar distraction and implant installation on 22 areas (3 maxilla and 19 mandible) using intraoral alveolar distraction device were examined. After consolidation period of 3-4 months, distraction devices were removed and 91 implants were installed in the distracted alveolar bone. The distracted bone and implants were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Results: Mean height of distracted alveolar bone was $7.5{\pm}3.2$ mm (range: 2.5-15.0 mm). Mean follow-up period after completion of the distraction was 3.1 years (range: 1.4-11.5 years). Mean resorption of distracted alveolar bone was $1.6{\pm}1.8$ mm. The success and survival rates of implants was 95.3% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that vertical alveolar distraction procedure is a useful and stable method for alveolar ridge augmentation and implantation.

• The korean journal of orthodontics
• /
• v.31 no.5 s.88
• /
• pp.499-504
• /
• 2001

Transverse skeletal deficiency is a common clincal problem associated with narrow basal and dentoalveolar bone. The clinical characteristics of transverse deficiency presents with anterior crowding and posterior buccal crossbite. Orthodontic expansion, using lip bumper and functional devices, was recommanded for younger ages. However, expansion of lower anterior area in older Patients is unstable and tends to relapse toward the original dimension. Distraction osteogenesis is a unique form of clincal tissue engineering and biologic process of new bone formation between bone segments that are gradually separately by incremental traction. Distraction osteogenesis was considered that great potential for correcting transverse mandibular deficiencies. In this Paper, a case of treated transverse deficiency patients with distraction osteogenesis using tooth-borne and tooth & bone-borne distractor is presented.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.30 no.5
• /
• pp.391-399
• /
• 2004

Distraction osteogenesis has been thought to be promising technique for replacing bone graft in maxilla and mandible. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression of osteonectin on distraction osteogenesis. Sixteen rabbits were used for this experiment. Osteotomy was performed between premolar and mental foramen. On the experimental group, distraction device was connected to the respective bone segments. On the control group, bone segments were fixed using plate and screws after osteotomy. Distraction was carried out at the rate of 0.7mm per day to obtain a 4.9mm elongation on the experimental group. After 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days two rabbits of each group were sacrificed. The results obtained from this study were as follow : Experimental group was observed that the gaps between the distracted bone edges were occupied by new bone. Expression of Osteonectin were detected throughout the experiment in both groups and Expression of Osteonectin were markedly increased during distraction and consolidation period in experimental group than control group. From these results, it could be stated that distraction was shown to improve and accelerate bone formation and mechanical stress like distraction has considerable effects on osteonectin.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.33 no.5
• /
• pp.470-478
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical, biomechanical, and histologic changes in new distraction osteogenesis(DO) technique combined with a compression stimulation in accordance to different compression-distraction force ratio. 23 adult male rabbits underwent open-osteotomy at the mandibular body area and a external distraction device was applied. In the control group of 8 rabbits, only a 8 mm of distraction was performed by conventional DO technique. In an experimental group of 15 rabbits, a distraction followed by a compression force was performed according to the ratio of compression-distraction suggested by authors. The rate of experimental group I was set up as a 2 mm compression versus 10 mm distraction and the rate of experimental group II was set up as a 3 mm compression versus 11 mm distraction. All the rabbits were sacrificed for a gross finding, biomechanical, histomorphometric and histologic findings at the time of 55 days from the operation day. The results were as follows: 1. On the gross findings, because all rabbits had a sufficient healing time, every distracted new bone had good bone quality and we could not find any difference among all three groups. 2. In the histologic findings, rapid bone maturation(wide lamellar bone formation in the cancellous and cortical bone areas) was observed in two experimental groups compared to the control group. 3. On the bone density tests, the experimental group II showed higher bone density than the other experimental group and control group(control group-$0,2906g/cm^2$, experimental group I-$0.2961g/cm^2$, experimental group II-$0.3328g/cm^2$). 4. On the biomechanical tests, the experimental group II had significantly higher bone microhardness than the other experimental group and control group(control group-252.7 MPa, experimental group I-263.5 MPa, experimental group II-426.0 MPa). 5. On the microhardness tests, when we compared the hardness ratio of distracted bone versus normal bone, we could find experimental group II had significantly higher hardness ratio than the other experimental group and control group(control group-0.47, experimental group I-0.575, experimental group II-0.80). From this study, we could deduce that the modified distraction osteogenesis method with a compression stimulation might improve the quality of bone regeneration and shorten the consolidation period in comparison with conventional distraction osteogenesis techniques.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.242-246
• /
• 2006

Objective : This is to report the criteria of success of intraoral distraction osteogenesis for alveolar augmentation in the severely atrophied alveolar defects through clinical result of 2 cases. Subjects and Methods : Anterior segmental osteotomy was performed and alveolar distractors (Martin and Leibinger, Germany) were applied each in 2 patients with severely defected anterior maxillary area. The osteomized alveolar segments were distracted by 1mm a day after latency period. After the consolidation period implants were installed with removal of distractor. The implants were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Results : In Case I, the distracted bone was directed to the palatal side, and another augmentation treatment - block bone graft, guided bone regeneration - was needed. In Case II, the successful alveolar bone augmentation was achieved. Dental implant was placed on distracted alveolar bone, and showed good osseointegration and good function without any complication. Conclusion : Distraction osteogenesis can be a good choice for alveolar ridge augmentation of severely atrophied ridges. However, the anterior esthetic prosthetics relies on the control of the vector, the kind of distractor, the healing capacity of patient and the etiology of atrophy. Therefore another study of each category would be needed.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2007

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of compression on the distracted area in new bone formation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Materials and method: Sixteen rabbits, weighing approximately 2 Kg, and the prefabricated distraction device were used. With the rabbits under general anesthesia, we performed vertical osteotomies between the anterior and posterior mandibular teeth and then placed the distraction device. After a 5 -day latency period, the mandible was distracted to a length of 10.0 mm at a rate of 1 mm/day and then immediately compressed 4 mm in the experimental group (n=8). In the control group (n=8), the mandible was distracted to a length of 6.0 mm at a rate of 1 mm/day. Rabbits in the control group were killed at 2 and 8 weeks during the consolidation period. The specimens were evaluated with light microscope after H & E stain. Histomorphometric analysis was done at 8 week specimens. Results: All experimental animals showed mandibular elongation on the macroscopical and radiographic evaluations. At 2 week, immature bone formation was observed from the surface of the host bone margins with collagen fibers arranged parallel to the direction of distraction in the control group; in the experimental group, immature bone formation was observed adjacent to the host bone, and the collagen fibers were not arranged uniformly. At 8 week, spindle-shaped new bone formation was seen in the direction of distraction in distracted area of the control group, while in the experimental group, the newly formed bone was arranged in a multidirectional manner, like the pattern of trabeculae. In the histomorphometric analysis of 8 weeks, the area of bone deposition was $2.12{\pm}\;0.75\;inch^2$ in the experimental group and $0.87{\pm}0.51\;inch^2$ in the control group (p<0.01). The bone deposition ratio was $29.60{\pm}10.50%$ in the experimental group and $12.10{\pm}7.17%$ in the control group (p<0.01). Conclusion: These results suggest that compression after over-distraction during the mandibular distraction osteogenesis is an effective method of increasing the amount of newly formed bone in distracted area.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.315-323
• /
• 2005

For reconstruction of the bony defect, distraction osteogenesis has many advantages in comparison with bone graft. However, it needs long consolidation period for sufficient bone maturity. This study is performed to evaluate the effect of PRP injection into the distracted mandible on bone formation in rabbits. Twelve house rabbits, weighing 2 kg, were used. All animals underwent bilateral mandibular osteotomy under general anesthesia. A internal distractor divice was positioned along a plane perpendicular to the line of osteotomy. After 5 days of latency period, distraction osteogenesis was started at a rate of 1 mm/day for 9 days which was distracted 9 mm totally. After completion of distraction, 0.5 ml of PRP which collected in rabbit blood was injected into the distracted mandible on experimental group, whereas no injection was done in control group. Macroscopical, radiographical, and histological, and histomorphometric examinations were performed 2, 4 and 8 weeks after distraction. All animals showed distracted mandible and severe anterior cross-bite. In radiographical findings 2 weeks after distraction, more radiopacity in the distracted gap was found in experimental group than that of control group. At 4 weeks after distraction, distracted bone was similar to normal bone in experimental group. In histological findings, 1) At 2 weeks after distraction, number of osteoblasts and angiogenesis in the distracted gap was found in experimental group than that of control group. 2) At 4 weeks after distraction, more active and distinct bone in the distracted gap was found in experimental group than that of control groups. 3) At 8 weeks after distraction, more dense and matured lamellated bone in the distracted gap was found in experimental group than that of control group. In histomorphometrical findings 8 weeks after distraction, more bone formation was observed in experimental group than control group (p<0.01). These results indicate that administration of PRP into the distracted mandible can promote bone formation.