Browse > Article

A CASE REPORT OF IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN DISTRACTION-AUGMENTED ALVEOLAR BONE OF THE MANDIBLE  

Ryu, Hyun-Wook (Dept. of Implant Center, School of Dentistry, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.31, no.4, 2009 , pp. 325-329 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : This is to report the effectiveness of intraoral distraction osteogenesis, iliac bone graft for alveolar augmentation in the extremely atrophied alveolar defects after infected allobone grafted area. Subjects and Methods : Anterior segmental osteotomy was performed and the trans-oral alveolar distractors (Martin, Germany) were applied in patient with the severe acquired anterior mandibular and mandibular defect after ameloblastoma enucleation. Iliac bone grafts were performed in defect sites and distraction osteogenesis were treated. After latent period for 1 week, the osteomized alveolar segments were distracted by 0.75 mm a day (0.25 mm/1 turn) for 10 days The consolidation period was about 12 weeks. Thereafter, 2 titanium threaded implants were simultaneously installed with removal of distractor. For oral rehabilitiation, The implants were installed in maxilla, mandible. It was tested with clinically and radiographically. Results : Amounts of acquired alveolar bone were 10 mm with the increased width of the ridge crests and soft tissue expansion. Dental implants installated on the augmented alveolar ridges in 12 weeks after distraction were confirmed as in good osseointegration and in good function without any complications. Conclusion : Intraoral distraction osteogenesis can be a good option for alveolar ridge augmentation of the severely atrophied ridges and soft-tissue defects.
Keywords
Distraction osteogenesis; Alveolar distraction; Alveolar augmentation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Konboh T, Xestesson PL, Takahashi M : Prevalence of morphological changes in the surfaces of temporomandibular joint disk associated with inerangement, J Oral Mawillofac Surg 56 : 339, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Gardner DG : A pathologist's approach to the treatment of ameloblastoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 : 161, 1984   DOI
3 Ilizarov GA : The principles of the Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 48 : 1, 1988   PUBMED
4 Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues : Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 238 : 249, 1989
5 Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and the growth of tissues : Part Ⅱ. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 239 : 263, 1989
6 Klein C, Howaldt HP : Mandibular micrognathism as a sequence early childhood capitulum fractures and their treatment using traction osteogenesis, Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 41 : 147, 1999
7 Mehlisch DR, Dahlin DC, Masson JK : Ameloblastoma: a clinico- pathologic report. J Oral Surg 30 : 9, 1972
8 Carlson D : Growth of the temporomandibular joint. In Zarb GA,Carlsson GE, Sessle BJ, Mohl ND, editors : Temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscle function, Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1994
9 Aronson J : Experimental and clinical experiences with distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 31 : 473, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kim Myung Jin, Kim Yeo Gap et al : Seoul Jisung Published Oral cancer : 242-256, 2002
11 Cope JB, Samchukov ML : Regenerate bone formation and remodeling during mandibular osteodistraction. Angle Orthod 70 : 99, 2000
12 MJ Troulis, J Glowacki, DH Perrott et al : Effect of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 : 509, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
13 McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N et al : Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 : 1, 1992   DOI   PUBMED
14 Sato M, Ochi T, Nakase T et al : Mechanical tensionstress induces expression of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and BMP-4, but not BMP-6, BMP-7, and GDF-5 mRNA, during distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 14 : 1084, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Codivilla A : On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2 : 353, 1905
16 Block MS, Chang A, Crawford C : Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 309, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Tavakoli K, Walsh WR, Bonar F et al : The role of latency in mandibular osteodistraction. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 29 :165, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Aroson J : The biology of distraction osteogenesis. In Chapman MW, editor: Perative orthopaedics, Phioladelphia, JB Lippincott, 1993
19 Hollier LN, Kim JH, Grayson BH et al : Mandibular growth after distraction in patients after 48months of age Reconstr Surg 103 : 1361, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Shatkin S, Hoffmeister FS : Ameloblastoma: A rational approach to therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 20 : 421, 1965   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R et al : Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part I : clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30 : 89, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Wiltfang J, Kessler P, Merten HA et al : Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder; experimental study in minipigs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39 : 2, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM et al : Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 51 : 506, 1973   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
24 Sehdev MK, Huvos AG, Strong EW et al : Ameloblastoma of maxilla And mandible. Cancer 33 : 324-333, 1974   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Jung se yong, Lee yoi woong : Pathologic & Histologic research of ameloblastoma. J Korean Oral & Maxillofac Surg 13 : 161, 1987