• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제31권5D호
• /
• pp.719-726
• /
• 2011

정부에서는 최저가 낙찰제도의 무리한 저가투찰을 방지하기 위해 입찰가격 적정성 심사기준 등을 강화하고 있으나, 낙찰가율이 저하되는 근본적인 문제점이 여전히 상존하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 최저가낙찰제도의 입찰금액 적정성 심사기준 문제점을 분석하였으며, 그 결과 발주기관의 기초금액 결정요소의 제한적 공개, 5% 초과분 구분공종의 비율, 부적정공종의 제한적인 심사항목 등이 낮은 낙찰가율을 형성하는 주요 요인으로 파악하였다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기존의 입찰금액의 적정성 심사 절차상의 문제점을 개선 할 수 있는 방법을 제안하고, 적정낙찰가율 범위에서 낙찰자를 선정할 수 있는 입찰금액 적정성 심사 기준을 보완한 프로세스 모형을 제시하며, 기존 발주사례를 통하여 적정성을 검증하고 있다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 2th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.106-118
• /
• 2007

Little attention has been focussed on a precise definition and evaluation mechanism for project management risk specifically related to contractors. When bidding, contractors traditionally price risks using unsystematic approaches. The high business failure rate our industry records may indicate that the current unsystematic mechanisms contractors use for building up contingencies may be inadequate. The reluctance of some contractors to include a price for risk in their tenders when bidding for work competitively may also not be a useful approach. Here, instead, we first define the meaning of contractor contingency, and then we develop a facile quantitative technique that contractors can use to estimate a price for project risk. This model will help contractors analyse their exposure to project risks; and also help them express the risk in monetary terms for management action. When bidding for work, they can decide how to allocate contingencies strategically in a way that balances risk and reward.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 1995년도 하계학술대회 논문집 B
• /
• pp.535-539
• /
• 1995

In recent years, electric industries in many countries confront with a structural change in business and socio-economic environments. Since 1984, PUC and utilities in U.S.A. have adopted or developing competitive bidding systems, and this new procurement programs prevailing and restructuring the power markets. In Korea, government and the Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) invited the private sector to build and operate two 500 MW coal plants and two 400 MW LNG plants during 2001 - 2004. The plan also specifies basic concepts and conditions for the IPP projects such that new IPPs are selected through competitive bidding system with the purchased power price based on the avoided cost. In this study, the direction, guideline and scoring methods to Korean IPP bidding system are presented. Also, as a benchmark price and rates for purchased power, the avoided cost calculation models are developed, this study may contribute for the development of private power in Korea, and improve overall economic efficiencies of whole electric power sector.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.69-76
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to suggest policies to improve the price escalation system in a construction contract through a Policy Delphi technique. The Delphi, including two times questionnaires and a group discussion, was conducted by joining 14 experts. Also, the escalation provisions of various countries were examined. Results of the Delphi showed that the minimum fluctuation rate for price escalation was desirable at a level of 3%. To compute the fluctuation rate, calculating the price fluctuation of overall articles was more desirable than using price indices. A bidding date was more reasonable as the initial date of change in price. Losses caused by price change should be shared between contractor and owner; therefore a deduction rate should be introduced in price escalation. Meanwhile, overhead and profit should be adjusted in proportion to the fluctuation rate; but advance payment or the delayed construction amount should be deducted from the adjusted amount.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.144-170
• /
• 2010

공공투자사업에서는 최저가낙찰제, 턴키 제도, 대안입찰제 등 다양한 방식이 사용되고 있다. 최근 가격경쟁을 통한 효율성 제고를 주목적으로 하는 최저가낙찰제가 확대되어 시행되고 있다. 본 논문은 우리나라 입 낙찰 제도의 현황과 특징을 파악하고, 대형 공공투자사업에 주로 적용되는 최저가 낙찰제, 턴키 대안 입찰제도하에서의 가격 경쟁효과가 직접적으로 드러나는 낙찰률을 비교 분석하는 것에 의미가 있다. 각 입찰제도의 성과는 경쟁의 행태에 달려 있음을 고려하여 경쟁률과 낙찰률을 중심으로 여러 입찰제도의 입 낙찰 현황을 분석하였다. 1,000억원 이상 사업의 경우 최저가낙찰제하에서 평균 입찰참여자 수는 33.75명, 평균 낙찰률은 61.18%로 나타나, 턴키 대안 입찰제의 평균 입찰참여자 수 2.94명, 평균 낙찰률 90.20%와 큰 차이를 보였다. 최저가낙찰제의 경우 규모의 차이를 고려한다 하더라도 낙찰률이 현저히 낮으며, 경쟁의 정도가 심한 것을 확인할 수 있다. 이러한 낙찰률의 차이는 근본적으로 제도의 차이로 해석할 수 있으며, 경쟁의 차이로도 일부 해석할 수 있다. 민간투자사업의 경우, 평균 입찰참여자 수는 1.88명이며, 평균 낙찰률은 90%에 이르고 있어 경쟁 활성화를 통해 효율성을 제고할 여지가 있음을 제시하였다.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.95-103
• /
• 2001

본 논문에서는 에이전트를 이용하여 판매자와 구매자가 실시간으로 인터넷을 통하여 효율적인 입찰을 할 수 있는 희망구매가 근접 방식의 입찰 시스템을 구현하고 있다. 특히 판매자들이 제시하는 가격의 낙폭 제한선을 적절하게 조절해 줌으로써 구매자의 희망 구매가에 근접한 낙찰을 유도하고, 유찰율을 줄일 수 있는 퍼지-기반 낙폭 제한 추론 방안을 제안하고 있다.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.213-230
• /
• 2022

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to find out any potential factors for explanatory variables when calculating the virtual successful bid rate in case of no collusion. Design/methodology/approach - An empirical analysis was conducted in this study with a regression analysis that included 725 bid samples under the public construction technical type bidding. Findings - The result of the basic analysis showed that there are several factors affecting the successful bid rate. First, collusion variable; second, government variable; third, successful bidder design score variable and the number of bidder variable among bidding features; fourth, turnkey variable based on the alternative method; fifth, civil works variable and plant works variable based on building work; sixth, asset variable and the fourth-quarter performance difference variable. However, the technical proposal method variable among bidding features was found to be statistically insignificant in column(4). Research implications or Originality - The significance of this research is that new variable such as the government variable and the fourth-quarter performance difference variable were added in the regression model, which showed statistically significant research results.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 5th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.479-487
• /
• 2013

State Highway Agencies (SHAs) have started utilizing cost-plus-time bidding (A+B bidding) since Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) declared it operational on May 4, 1995. Although this technique has successfully accelerated many projects by incorporating construction time in the bidding competition, a framework to illustrate the interactions of incentive/disincentive (I/D) rates on the competitiveness of contractors participating in the bid competition is yet to be developed. In a previous research, authors indicated that for each bid competition there is an efficient cap for I/D rates which are dictated by the capabilities of contractors in project acceleration. However, the results of previous study were based on the assumption that there is a statistically significant relationship between cost and time. In this study, the entire cost-plus-time projects implemented by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) were investigated. Then the significance of relationship between cost and time were analyzed for each contractor utilizing Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) technique, and the price-time function of each contractor was determined by regression analysis. The results of the analysis indicate that there is a significant relationship between cost and time for the majority of contractors. However, a quadratic relationship is not always significant and for some contractors a linear price-time relationship is significant. The results of this project can be used not only by ODOT to optimize the incentive/disincentive rates but also by contractors to determine the most competitive strategies of other bid participants.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.52-60
• /
• 2018

우리나라의 공공건설공사는 입찰을 통해 공사를 발주하고 있으나 하지만 입찰의 특성상 참여자들간의 담합이 발생할 수 있다. 이에 따른 입찰담합은 발주자에게 손해를 가하는바, 이를 배상할 수 있도록 적절한 가상경쟁가격을 산정해야 한다. 이와 관련하여 계량경제학적 방법이 일반적으로 활용되고 있으나 건설공사, 특히 설계 시공일괄입찰의 특성상 여러 한계와 쟁점이 발생할 수밖에 없다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 설계 시공일괄입찰에서 합리적인 가상경쟁가격을 추정할 수 있는 방안을 제안한다. 이는 입찰 참가자가 제출한 설계도서로부터 한계비용을 도출하고, 입찰 참가자의 기술 수준과 경쟁업체의 기술 수준 및 입찰 형태에 따라 입찰율에 따른 요인을 검토하여 가상경쟁가격을 추정하는 방법이다. 본 연구에서 제안한 방법을 토대로 설계 시공일괄입찰 낙찰자 결정 방식의 특성이 반영된 합리적인 가격이 도출될 수 있으며, 답함에 따른 손해액 산정뿐만 아니라 실제 입찰 과정에서의 참고자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이라 판단된다.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.55-68
• /
• 2002

Internet group buying systems have been widely used recently. In those systems, because the reserve price is provided by the buyer, the success rate can be decreased if the reserve price is set too low compared with the normal price. Otherwise, an unsuitable successful bid can be made if the reserve price is set too high based on inaccurate information. Likewise, the seller's providing too high a bid price can deteriorate his/her own successful bid rate, whereas a successful bid with too low a price may make no profit in the sale. Therefore, pricing agents that recommend adequate prices based on the past buying and selling history data can be helpful. In this paper, we propose two kinds of agents. One suggests reserve prices to buyers based on the past buying history database of the system. The other recommends bid prices to a seller based on the past bidding history data of the company using the cost accounting theory. Through performance experiments, we show that the successful bid rate can increase by preventing buyers from making unreasonable reserve prices. Also, we show that, for the seller, the rate of successful bids with appropriate profits can increase. Using the pricing agents, we design and implement an XML-based group buying system.