• KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS)
• /
• v.8 no.12
• /
• pp.4552-4567
• /
• 2014

A (n,t,n) secret sharing scheme is to share a secret among n group members, where each member also plays a role of a dealer,and any t shares can be used to recover the secret. In this paper, we propose a strong (k,t,n) verifiable multi-secret sharing scheme, where any k out of n participants operate as dealers. The scheme realizes both threshold structure and adversary structure simultaneously, and removes a trusted third party. The secret reconstruction phase is performed using an additive homomorphism for decreasing the storage cost. Meanwhile, the scheme achieves the pre-verification property in the sense that any participant doesn't need to reveal any information about real master shares in the verification phase. We compare our proposal with the previous (n,t,n) secret sharing schemes from the perspectives of what kinds of access structures they achieve, what kinds of functionalities they support and whether heavy storage cost for secret share is required. Then it shows that our scheme takes the following advantages: (a) realizing the adversary structure, (b) allowing any k out of n participants to operate as dealers, (c) small sized secret share. Moreover, our proposed scheme is a favorable candidate to be used in many applications, such as secure multi-party computation and privacy preserving data mining, etc.

• Journal of applied mathematics & informatics
• /
• v.30 no.3_4
• /
• pp.517-529
• /
• 2012

In this paper, the existence theorem of two positive solutions is established for nonlinear m-point boundary value problem by using an inequality for the following third-order differential equations $$({\phi}(u^{\prime\prime}))^{\prime}+a(t)f(t,u(t))=0,\;t{\in}(0,1)$$, $${\phi}(u^{\prime\prime}(0))=\sum^{m-2}_{i=1}a_i{\phi}(u^{\prime\prime}({\xi}_i)),\;u^{\prime}(1)=0,\;u(0)=\sum^{m-2}_{i=1}b_iu({\xi}_i)$$, where ${\phi}:R{\rightarrow}R$ is an increasing homeomorphism and homomorphism and $\phi(0)=0$. The nonlinear term f may change sign, as an application, an example to demonstrate our results is given.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.61-69
• /
• 2000

Let($X^{\ast},\tau^{\ast}$) be the space with one point Lindeloffication topology of space (X,$\tau$). This paper offers the definition of the space with one point Lin-deloffication topology of a topological space and proves that the retraction regu-lar closed function f: $K^{\ast}(X^{\ast}$) defined f($A^{\ast})=A^{\ast}$ if p $\in A^{\ast}$ or ($f(A^{\ast})=A^{\ast}-{p}$ if $p \in A^{\ast}$ is a homomorphism. There are two examples in this paper to show that the retraction regular closed function f is neither a surjection nor an injection.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.293-300
• /
• 1995

Let $R = k[y_1,\cdots,y_n] \otimes E[x_1, \cdots, x_n]$ with characteristic $k = p > 2$ (odd prime), where $$\mid$y_i$\mid$ = 2, $\mid$x_i$\mid$ = 1$ and $y_i = \betax_i, \beta$ is the Bockstein homomorphism. Topologically, $R = H^*(B(Z/p)^n,k)$. For a symmetric group $\sum_n, R^{\sum_n} = k[\sigma_1,\cdots,\sigma_n] \otimes E[d\sigma_1, \cdots, d\sigma_n]$ where d is the derivation satisfying $d(y_i) = x_i$ and $d(x_iy_i) = x_iy_i + x_jy_i, 1 \leq i, j \leq n$. We give a direct proof of this theorem by using induction.

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.57 no.3
• /
• pp.709-737
• /
• 2020

Let R be a prime ring of characteristic different from 2. Suppose that F, G, H and T are generalized derivations of R. Let U be the Utumi quotient ring of R and C be the center of U, called the extended centroid of R and let f(x₁, …, x_n) be a non central multilinear polynomial over C. If F(f(r₁, …, r_n))G(f(r₁, …, r_n)) - f(r₁, …, r_n)T(f(r₁, …, r_n)) = H(f(r₁, …, r_n)²) for all r₁, …, r_n ∈ R, then we describe all possible forms of F, G, H and T.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.561-569
• /
• 2018

In this paper, we introduce some notions of orthogonality in the setting of Finsler $C^*$-modules and investigate their relations with the Birkhoff-James orthogonality. Suppose that ($E,{\rho}$) and ($F,{\rho}^{\prime}$) are Finsler modules over $C^*$-algebras $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$, respectively, and ${\varphi}:{\mathcal{A}}{\rightarrow}{\mathcal{B}}$ is a *-homomorphism. A map ${\Psi}:E{\rightarrow}F$ is said to be a ${\varphi}$-morphism of Finsler modules if ${\rho}^{\prime}({\Psi}(x))={\varphi}({\rho}(x))$ and ${\Psi}(ax)={\varphi}(a){\Psi}(x)$ for all $a{\in}{\mathcal{A}}$ and all $x{\in}E$. We show that each ${\varphi}$-morphism of Finsler $C^*$-modules preserves the Birkhoff-James orthogonality and conversely, each surjective linear map between Finsler $C^*$-modules preserving the Birkhoff-James orthogonality is a ${\varphi}$-morphism under certain conditions. In fact, we state a version of Wigner's theorem in the framework of Finsler $C^*$-modules.