• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.109-131
• /
• 2010

Investment Agreement is to be a part of FTA, as negotiating together both trade and investment. For example, it has a separate chapter about investment in KORUS FTA contract and is more detailed and inclusive than BIT contents which are traditional investment provisions. It is called to the investment norm of FT A. The investment agreement lures a foreign investment by providing the environment which is stable to the foreign investors. Hence, it plans in goal for the economic development of the home country. In international investment, the arbitration award cases are coming out to be divided into two parts applying MFN provisions in investor protective principles and dispute resolution process; the tendency of broad interpretation and the tendency of limited interpretation. In the case of RosInvest Co UK Ltd v. the Russian Federation awarded in 2007, the arbitration tribunal interprets that the application scope of MFN provisions contain the more lucrative dispute provision than other BITs without limitations in entity right of the investor. This judgment is the same view as arbitration tribunal position of Maffezini case. The arbitration tribunal of Plama case has kept out an assertion magnifying the arbitration tribunal's jurisdiction. That is, for applying more inclusive investor-nation resolution method from different treaty, tribunal mentioned that MFN provision had to see clearly a point of applying the investor-nation dispute resolution method. Dispute resolution process providing inclusive MFN provision has both the tendency of broad interpretation and the tendency of limited interpretation. It needs ceaselessly to do the monitoring about cases of arbitration award. In conclusion, the point where MFN provisions are applied conclusively is recognized, but it is still controversial whether or not to magnify the jurisdiction of arbitration tribunal applying MFN provisions. Therefore, it does not exist clear principle in the theory or in the award eases about the application scope for entity protection provision of MFN. Hence, The Korean government of Korea and local autonomous entities needs to keep their eyes on the trend of the international arbitration award cases in relation to the investment dispute for the future. Also, Korean government or local self-governing group must consider MFN provisions when they make a contract of international investment treaty such as writing concretely the application of MFN provisions from KORUS FTA.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.107-132
• /
• 2019

The arbitration procedure, which is a private trial, does not have a separate enforcement agency. Therefore, unless a party consents to the arbitration award and voluntarily fulfills the award, its execution is accomplished through the implementation of the national court. In particular, the decision in the foreign arbitration procedure will be refused or rejected for the arbitration award in case the proceedings of the law and procedure on which the judgment is based are caused by inconsistency with the domestic law or procedural defect. However, all foreign arbitration awards generally do not have to go through the approval process, and it will come into force with the arbitration award. In the case of Germany in the revision of the German Civil Procedure Act of 1996, the main provisions of the New York Convention concerning the ratification and enforcement of arbitration proceedings are reflected. Germany provides for the arbitration procedures in the arbitration proceedings of Book 10 of the Civil Procedure Act. Particularly, with Article 1061 in Book 10 Section 8 below, the approval and enforcement of foreign arbitrators shall be governed. Article 1061 has been referred to as "The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Jurisdictions," Article 5 (1). The main reasons for approval and enforcement rejection are: (1) Reason for the acceptance or refusal of enforcement by request of the parties: Reason for failure of subjective arbitration ability, invalidation of arbitration agreement, collapse of attack or defense method, dispute not included in arbitration agreement, (2) Reasons for the approval and enforcement of arbitration considered by the competent authority of the arbitrator: violation of objective arbitration ability, violation of public order, but not based on the default of German statute.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제46권
• /
• pp.315-350
• /
• 2010

The rapid growth of Korea-China trade that was since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1992, led China to surpass the United States and Japan to become Korea's largest trading partner in 2009. "The largest trade" also means "the most disputes", so it is essential to study on dispute settlement and enforcement system of the two. Therefore, in order to make the traders correctly understand and use the arbitration as a dispute settlement method in both China and Korea, this article makes a comparative study on arbitration system between the two countries. And finally, it analyzes the enforcement situation of arbitral award in China, then provides the author's personal recommendations as a countermeasure against the poor enforcement system in China.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.3-21
• /
• 2007

Arbitration is a private and contractual means of dispute resolution. As a creature of contract, any particular arbitration owes its existence-and attendant limitations-to an arbitral agreement. This means that, in practice, the parties select their own judges, forum, and rules. By agreeing to arbitration, parties hope to achieve several goals. And arbitration has proven to be quicker, cheaper, and more predictable than litigation as a means of resolving many types of claims. As a primary method of conflict resolution, it is now worthwhile to consider carefully any procedural mechanism designed to promote the central aims of this alternative to litigation. It is helpful to frame any particular analysis according to (1) the type of decision for which preclusive effect is sought (arbitral award or court judgment) and (2) the type of subsequent proceeding in which preclusion is sought (an arbitration or a litigation). Res judicata may well bar litigation of that claim between the parties, but non-parties (affiliates or individuals) will not benefit from this bar unless the arbitral tribunal makes findings sufficient to satisfy the elements of collateral estoppel. The final permutation to be considered involves an arbitral award's preclusive effect on a subsequent arbitration. Whether a prior court decision should preclude issues or claims in a subsequent arbitration presents the easiest case for analysis. It is the easiest primarily because there is generally little room to debate whether adequate procedures were followed in a litigation. That is, one can safely assume that the rules of evidence and the rules of civil procedure were followed and that formal records sufficiently memorialize both the proceeding itself and the ultimate decision. Procedural regularity is mentioned not necessarily because it is an analytic tool, but because so many jurists and scholars see it as an impediment to the application of preclusionary doctrines.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.48-56
• /
• 2022

야구에서 데이터분석의 중요성은 점점 더 커지고 있는데, 이는 Billy Beane의 머니볼 이론을 적용한 MLB의 오클랜드 구단과 2020년 KBO 우승팀인 NC다이노스의 사례에서도 알 수 있다. 미국 뿐 만 아니라 우리나라에서도 데이터를 이용한 다양한 연구이 이루어지고 있는데, 특히 경기의 승패를 예측하기 딥러닝 및 머신러닝을 이용한 연구가 활발하게 진행되고 있다. 그러나 기존 연구의 경우 경기 승패 예측에 초점이 맞추어져 있으며, 어떠한 요인이 경기에 중요한 영향을 주었는지에 대한 결과 해석이 어렵다는 한계점이 존재한다. 이에 따라 본 논문에서는 포지션별 최고의 선수에게 수여되는 골든글러브 수상 예측 모형을 개발하고, 어떠한 요인이 수상에 영향을 주는지를 파악함으로써, 우수한 선수로 구분되는 척도를 찾고자 한다. 분석 모형으로는 Boosting 기법 중의 하나인 XGBoost를 이용하였으며, 어떠한 요인이 골든글러브 수상에 중요한 영향을 주었는지 파악하기 위하여 XGBoost의 변수 중요도를 이용하였다. 이와 같은 분석을 통해 각 포지션별 중요한 지표를 파악할 수 있었다.

• 대한전자공학회논문지SD
• /
• 제47권5호
• /
• pp.80-86
• /
• 2010

전형적인 버스 시스템 구조는 공용버스 내에 여러 개의 마스터와 슬레이브, 아비터 그리고 디코더 등으로 구성되어 있다. 복수의 마스터가 동시간대에 버스를 이용할 수 없으므로, 아비터는 이를 중재하는 역할을 수행한다. 아비터가 어떠한 중재방식 을 선택하는가에 따라 버스 사용의 효율성이 결정된다. 기존의 중재 방식에는 Fixed Priority 방식, Round-Robin 방식, TDMA 방식, Lottery 방식 등이 연구되고 있는데, 버스 우선권이 주로 고려되어 있다. 본 논문에서는 마스터별 버스 점유율을 연산하는 블록을 이용하는 버스중재 방식을 제안하고, TLM(Transaction Level Model)을 통해 다른 중재 방식과 비교하여 성능을 검증하였다. 성능분석 결과, 기존의 Fixed Priority 방식과 Round-Robin 방식은 버스점유율을 설정할 수 없었으며 기존의 TDMA, Lottery 중재방식의 경우에는 100,000 사이클 이상에서 사용자가 설정한 버스점유율과 비교하여 각각 최대 50%, 70%의 오차가 발생하였다. 반면에 점유율 고려 중재방식의 경우에는 약 1000 사이클 이후부터 사용자가 설정한 버스점유율과 비교하여 1% 이하의 오차를 유지하였다.

• 한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.137-144
• /
• 2018

과거 모자이크 기법은 바닥에 천을 깔고 타일을 수작업으로 붙여 제작하였다. 하지만 최근 기술의 발달로 데이터 저장 방식이 아날로그에서 디지털로 발전하여 컴퓨터를 통한 이미지 표현과 변환이 가능해지며 모자이크의 표현 기법 또한 다양하게 발전하고, 디지털로의 예술표현 방식으로도 사용되어지며 공학 분야에서도 그 제작 과정에 대한 연구들이 다양하다. 본 논문에서 제안하는 기법은 나선형으로 실시간 퍼져나가는 결정화(Crystallization)모자이크로 타일요소는 3D석영(Crystal)을 사용한다. 기존 연구들은 대체로 이미지를 좀 더 세밀하게 묘사하기 위함이 연구 목적의 주를 이루고 있지만 본 기법은 시도되지 않았던 나선 드로잉과 결정화를 접목하고 3D 공간에서의 새로운 모자이크 방식을 시도 한다. 또한 제안하는 기법의 대한 검증과 이를 기반으로 게임으로의 발전방향에 대해 모색한다. 본 기법을 바탕으로 제작된 작품 'Spiral Crystallization Photo' 는 MWU Award'18에서 Top27에 선정되었으며 Unite Seoul 2018에서 전시 되었다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.11-30
• /
• 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to lay groundwork for future research on the outcomes of national quality awards for secondary-care healthcare organizations. Methods: For this study, a secondary-care hospital was selected through a convenience sampling method and all of its organizational members participated in complete enumeration survey using 109 survey questions derived from the MBNQA criteria for healthcare through structural equation modeling (SEM) Results: As a result, Leadership was shown to drive Foundation and Direction, which affect System that creates Results with 12 hypotheses supported out of 18 hypotheses established. Conclusion: The findings of this study will provide valuable implications to the top management of secondary-care hospitals for self-examining quality management and promoting sustainable competitiveness.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 1995년도 춘계공동학술대회논문집; 전남대학교; 28-29 Apr. 1995
• /
• pp.827-844
• /
• 1995

Total Quality Management (TQM) is the aggregated management philosophy for quality including production, operation, human resource, leadership, marketing, and etc. TQM is the advanced concept and philosophy rather than traditional "Quality Control" or "Quality Assurance". Nowadays, downstream costs has been increased, that made cost accountants' attention to costs of quality. Many countries have developed their own quality awards system in order to improve overall national quality level. The Deming Prize of Japan and Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) of United States are two representatives of quality prizes. We compared the two awards by means of their history, objective, coverage, and judging criteria. Deming Prize has a longer history than MBNQA. Deming Prize selects five winners a year, while MBNQA has two or three areas. The biggest difference is judgement criteria. The Deming Prizes focuses on statistical control which is a traditional quality control method, while MBNQA concentrates on modem business concept such as customer satisfaction. The suggestions to these awards are: evaluate more on information of quality; evaluate more on inter-functional relationship between quality control function and other link more financial success.e financial success.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.75-80
• /
• 2014

Risks, uncertainties, and associated cost overruns are critical problems for construction projects. Cost contingency is an important funding source for these unforeseen events and is included in the base estimate to help perform financially successful projects. In order to predict more accurate contingency, many empirical models using regression analysis and artificial neural network method have been proposed and showed its viability to minimize prediction errors. However, categorical factors on contingency cannot have been treated and thus considered in these empirical models since those models are able to treat only numerical factors. This paper identified potential factors on contingency in transportation construction projects and evaluated categorical factors using the one-way ANOVA statistical method. Among factors including project work type, delivery method type, contract agreement type, bid award type, letting type, and geographical location, two factors of project work type and contract agreement type were found to be statistically important on allocating cost contingency.