• Title/Summary/Keyword: Analytic Judgement

Search Result 33, Processing Time 0.026 seconds

Analysis of Consciousness Structure R&D Project Evaluation (연구개발 프로젝트 평가에 대한 의식구조분석)

  • 김성희;김정자
    • Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.61-68
    • /
    • 2002
  • This paper provides a method of consciousness structure analysis for research and development project evaluation using fuzzy structure modeling(FSM). Fuzzy structure modeling, which is a modeling method for consciousness structure, has a large number of pairwise comparison by human subjective judgement and is difficult to check the consistency index of denoting the precision for human judgement. Thus, in this paper, we analyzed the structure of consciousness by fuzzy structural modeling method, introducing the concept of pairwise comparison matrix in Analytic Hierarchy Process.

The Credit Evaluation System for Micro-small Sized Individual Firms Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP 모형을 활용한 소상공인 신용평가시스템 구축)

  • Lee, Ju-Min;Kim, Seung-Yeon;Ha, Eun-Ho;Roh, Tae-Hyup
    • The Journal of Information Systems
    • /
    • v.16 no.3
    • /
    • pp.109-132
    • /
    • 2007
  • In the paper, we builds an advanced new credit evaluation system for Micro-small sized individual firms through appropriate evaluation factors derived by logistic regression analysis for credit evaluation model using in Korean Federation of Credit Guarantee Foundations, and the weights of factors computed by analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Industry characteristics are more applied to previous credit model with the additional the financial fact-information and non-financial judgement-information. Our results show that the financial factors have become more important than three years ago. Moreover, in the non-financial factors, the fact-information factors consider more important then the judgement-information factors. A new credit evaluation system is developed based on this credit evaluation model.

  • PDF

Analyticity and Completeness in Intuitionistic Type Theory (직관주의적 유형론에서의 분석성과 완전성)

  • Chung, In-Kyo
    • Korean Journal of Logic
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.101-137
    • /
    • 2011
  • Based on his analysis of judgement forms in intuitionistic type theory, Martin-L$\ddot{o}$f claims that the usual logical laws and interesting mathematical judgements are synthetic, not analytic. He further claims that the logic of analytic judgements is decidable and complete, while the logic of synthetic judgements is undecidable and incomplete. The aim of this article is to clarify and examine his claims. In section 1, I explain and give some comments on the monomorphic version of intuitionistic type theory. In section 2, after clarifying Martin-L$\ddot{o}$f's distinction between analytic and synthetic judgements, I examine some possible objections to it and evaluate the thesis that the usual logical laws and interesting mathematical judgements are synthetic. In section 3, I clarify and examine the thesis that the logic of analytic judgements is decidable and complete, while the logic of synthetic judgements is undecidable and incomplete.

  • PDF

The Influence of Brand Concept and Thinking Styles on the Non-similar Brand Extension (브랜드컨셉과 사고방식이 비유사 브랜드확장에 미치는 영향)

  • Kim, Gwi-Gon;Kim, Jong-Ho
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.10 no.3
    • /
    • pp.71-78
    • /
    • 2012
  • In this study, we tried to find the moderating effect as an interaction between brand concept variables and thinking style variables as well as the main effect of each. To this end, the inner wear bradns, CalvinKlein(symbolic concepts) and bodyguard(functional concept), as two parent brands and wallets as an extension product were selected. The results of this study were as follows: (i) Extension evaluation as well as fit judgement based on brand concepts was higher in symbolic brand than functional brand. (ii) The holistic thinkers were higher in fit judgement and expansion evaluation than the analytic ones. (iii) In case of symbolic brand, there was little differences in fit judgement and expansion evaluation between holistic thinkers and analytic thinkers. But In functional brand, there was some differences relatively. So, we found the interaction effect between variables in fit judgement and expansion evaluation. We can expect this research result to be helpful in working out diverse and practical marketing strategies using existing brand concepts in the global market environments.

A Decision Support System using Multiattribute Utility Model

  • Song, Soo-Sup
    • Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
    • /
    • v.16 no.2
    • /
    • pp.43-55
    • /
    • 1990
  • When people choose one way of action from various alternatives, they make value judgement. Due to limited capacity of human information processing, however, a decision maker cannot reflect his true subjective utility in evaluating alternatives especially for a problem which has multiattribute. The analytic hierachy model is a tool which converts scores derived from pairwise comparison with respect to each attribute to overall scores of the alternatives. Then the overall scores are utilized to choose an alternative. Therefore this model can be used to support people's value judgement.

  • PDF

The Model of Decision Making and the Method of Evaluating Criteria and Alternatives by Value Judgement, In Case of the University Student's Housing Choice (가치 판단에 기초한 의사결정 모형과 기준.대안의 평가 방법: 대학생의 주택 선택을 사례로)

  • Park, Kyu-Taeg;Lee, Sang-Yool
    • Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
    • /
    • v.9 no.2
    • /
    • pp.135-152
    • /
    • 2003
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest the model of supporting decision making and the method of evaluating criteria and alternatives by value judgement and to apply the model and method suggested to the case of the University Student's housing choice. The criteria and alternatives are evaluated in terms of intuitive judgement and the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). The university students of the Daegu Metropolitan area consider the socioeconomic and environmental factors more important than the characteristics of housing to evaluate their future housing types. In terms of the student's intuitive judgement, socio-educational environment, accessibility, economy, natural environment, and the characteristics of housing are considered in order as an important criteria of evaluating housing. The orders of the important criteria done by an intuitive judgement and the AHP are different. In terms of the AHP, apartment, detached dwelling, and row house are preferred in order as the student's future housing types. The orders of preferred housing types are, however, dynamically changed based on specific criteria. In sum, the model of decision making and the method of evaluating criteria and alternatives by value judgement will be applied to the real problems defined by uncertainty and high risk.

  • PDF

A Method of consciousness Structure Analysis Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP를 이용한 의식구조분석법)

  • 황승국
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems
    • /
    • v.6 no.4
    • /
    • pp.61-70
    • /
    • 1996
  • This paper deals with consciousn~s structure by means of human subjective judgement. Fuzzy structural modeling which is a modeling method for consciousness structure have the large number of pairwise comparigon by human subjective judgement, is difficplt to check the consistency index which denotes the precision for human judgement. To improve these points, we set the structure of consciousness by fuzzy structural modeling method using the concept of pairwise compariqon matrix in AHP. The efficiency of this method is showed by means of the consciousness structure graph to the qyality system construction.

  • PDF

A Commercial Paper Evaluation Model Based on the AHP (계층분석과정에 의한 기업어음 신용평가모형)

  • 이상석;홍재범
    • Korean Management Science Review
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.97-115
    • /
    • 1998
  • This study aims to develop the methodology based on the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) of evaluation for commercial paper. commercial paper is the ma product of merchant banks. commercial paper evaluation is annually performed by the credit-evaluation agency. Credit evaluation is performed by the informal judgemental system, which has potential to induce serious inconsistencies in decision-making. We present an objective scoring model which does not suffer from the weakness of the subjective judgement system. The model used is illustrated by analyzing the commercial paper evaluation for the 3 motor-companies(H, K and S motors).

  • PDF

Application of Analytic hierarchy Process to decide the priority of undeveloped neighborhood park (도시공원 조성의 우선순위 결정에 있어서 계층분석과정 기법의 적용)

  • 박문호
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.24 no.1
    • /
    • pp.42-54
    • /
    • 1996
  • Many of urban parks which have been designated for urban planning regulation are not well developed because the priority of investment is inferior to that of other public facilities. Park development is an urgent urban policy and it is hard to decide priority among parks. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the priority of park development. Thus the Analytic Hierarchy Process has been introduced because it is suitable for achieving objectivity by collecting the professional opinions. The goals of park development are evaluated by AHP method and the priorities among goals are conservation of natural environment, satisfying the residents' residents' needs, population density, regional pollution, land acquisition cost, ratio of greeneries and facilities within park areas. Priority of park development is decided by the standardization of each individual inventory data and considering of the professional opinions. Among the multi-attribute judgement methods, AHP method may be the most widely used. Despite the critical evaluations of the AHP, such as limitation of the nine-point scale and the rank reversal problem, application of AHP to decide the priority of park development is suitable for actual circumstances.

  • PDF

Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Prioritization in Expanding Health Insurance Benefit Package: in Case of Four Major Serious Diseases (Analytic Hierarchy Process를 이용한 건강보험 급여 우선순위 결정: 4대 중증질환 비급여항목을 중심으로)

  • Jeong, Hyoung-Sun;Cho, Jae-Young;Ko, Hey-Jin
    • Health Policy and Management
    • /
    • v.24 no.2
    • /
    • pp.181-190
    • /
    • 2014
  • Background: Demands are recently rising for the securement of procedural justification of policy decision-making. This study aims to improve the procedure of making a decision to expand health insurance benefit package from the perspective of building a social consensus. Methods: Major priority principles were firstly derived through literature search. Weights for such principles were calculated through an analytic hierarchy process, based upon the survey conducted for the health policy experts. Priority for 11 non-covered services was assessed by applying the weights as above to the results of the questionnaire survey targeted at people including members of related committees or societies. Results: Weights for priority principles were in the order of 'severity/urgency (0.428)', 'cost-effectiveness (0.318)', 'substitutability (0.164),' and 'accountability (0.090)'. What was obtained by applying these weights to the results of the questionnaire survey was considerably in line with what health experts classified those items into 3 groups depending on their own judgement of service necessity (consistent with 9 services out of 11). Conclusion: Results of the study are suggestive as to how far a brief assessment by experts could be utilized in case there are constraints on time and expenses in implementing all the process to secure procedural justification. Various attempts and endeavors need to be made to secure procedural justification that will not mar efficiency of decision-making in the days to come.