• 대한한의학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.112-121
• /
• 2010

Objectives: The aim of this study was to reflect upon the process of the legislation of the National Medical Services Law for traditional Korean medicine practitioners (TKM practitioners), especially at the Assembly plenary session of 1951. Methods: Various primary sources related to the legislation were examined, especially those in National Assembly Records and newspapers. Results: In 1950, the National Assembly wanted to establish the National Medical Services Law (國民醫療法) replacing the colonial medical services law (朝鮮醫療令), but it ended in failure. So in 1951, the National Assembly tried again. First, legislator Han Gukwon (韓國源), with 83 other legislators, introduced a bill for the new national health care system. The Society and Health (社會保健委員會) and the Legislation and Judiciary subcommittees (法制司法委員會) deliberated on this bill, and each proposed an amendment to the National Assembly. In the process of careful deliberation of these three proposals, the Ministry of Health and legislator Kim Ikgi (金翼基) each came up with a further amendment. Ultimately, Kim Ikgi's amendment was accepted by the National Assembly. According to his proposal, TKM practitioners were titled 'Hanuisa (漢醫師)', and the medical office name of TKM practitioners became 'Hanuiwon (漢醫院)'. Conclusions: The National Medical Services Law passed in 1951 was the beginning of the unique dual national medical license system of Korea. It recognized Western medicine and TKM practitioners equally under the national license system.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.382-393
• /
• 2019

The right to petition is a classical right of the people in constitutional states, and in Korea, it is a statutory right in the Constitution, the National Assembly Law, the Petition Law, and the Local Autonomy Act. The healthcare community first made a successful petition to the National Assembly when it achieved the amendment of the Government Organization Act through a petition to the National Assembly for the independence of the Ministry of Health, and this achievement served as the basis for further petitions. Since then, the healthcare community has successfully achieved the enactment and amendment of related occupational laws through National Assembly petitions, such as the amendment of Article 41, Paragraph 7 of the former Medical Insurance Act (Korean Medical Association, 14th Assembly), enactment of the Dental Health Act (Korean Dental Association, 15th Assembly), and amendment of the Health Functional Foods Act (Korea Pharmaceutical Association, 16th Assembly). Its petition accomplishment rate is higher than the total petition accomplishment rate of the Health and Welfare Committee of the National Assembly. However, along with the overall decrease in the number of National Assembly petitions, the Korean Medical Association and Korea Pharmaceutical Association have not achieved any results through petitioning since the 16th Assembly (June 2000), and the Korean Hospital Association and Korean Nurses Association have not achieved any results through petitioning since the 17th Assembly (April 2004). Furthermore, no National Assembly petitions have been made at all for 5 years (2014-2018). The Korean Medical Association and Korea Pharmaceutical Association previously showed a high petition accomplishment rate through their accumulated experience with National Assembly petitions and vigorous policy assistance from doctors/pharmacists/nurses turned lawmakers. More specifically, healthcare organizations have achieved results by actively conducting organized activities with the National Assembly, as implemented by a national assembly director and employees, and in case of petitions for legislation, each group has established infrastructure for reviewing the relevant laws by appointing a legislative director, as well as a legal advisor and advisory counsel. Although the organization that has submitted the most petitions to the National Assembly is the Korean Hospital Association, the group with the highest petition success rate is the Korean Medical Association, which may be linked to the relatively high proportion of doctors who have become lawmakers. Furthermore, the fact that other healthcare organizations were highly interested in petitioning the National Assembly has had major implications for the petition activities of healthcare organizations.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.279-288
• /
• 2016

Graphic health warning on the tobacco product package is a cost-effective tobacco control policy to convey information on harmful effect of tobacco use to health, and it is known not only to motivate smokers to quit but also to deter adolescents from start smoking. In case of Korea, amendments to National Health Promotion Act requiring implementation of graphic health warning had been submitted 13 times, from 2002 to May 2015. In May 2015, the amendment had been approved by the National Assembly and it enters into force on December 23, 2016. This research analyzed the discussions from Health and Welfare Committee of the National Assembly during the implementation of the graphic health warning in order to study decision making process of legislators. Study found that there was a shift from a general opposition on implementing graphic health warning at first to a harsh conflict over relaxation of the regulation once discussing the implementation in earnest. Particularly, while the group supporting the implementation of the graphic health warning or opposing relaxation advocated the amendment with scientific and knowledge-based evidences including the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the group opposing the adoption of the amendment itself or suggesting relaxation tended to defend their position with empathy on smokers or tobacco industries.

• 의정연구
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.67-99
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 "국회법으로 통칭하는 국회를 운영하는 절차적 규칙 개정에 누가 관여하며, 무엇이 이를 추동하는가?"라는 연구 질문을 가지고 국회선진화법이 시행된 제19대 국회에서 일어난 국회법 개정안 발의를 분석한다. 국회법 개정안 대표 발의자를 중심으로 공동 발의 네트워크를 분석한 결과 정파성에 따라 뚜렷하게 구별되었다. 연결 중심성이 높은 소수의 의원은 발의 시 여야 간 협력을 시도하였으나 이들이 발의한 법안은 결과적으로 상임위원회의 관문을 넘지 못했다. 또한, 개별 의원을 단위로 국회법 개정안 발의 동인에 대한 네 가지 경쟁적 가설('위원회 가설', '분배의 정치 가설', '이념적 거리 가설', '소속 정파 가설')을 새로운 측정변수를 포함하여 회귀분석한 결과, '위원회 가설'과 '소속 정파 가설'만이 경험적으로 지지 되었다. 결국, 그 내용상 비정파적이고 탈이념적인 규칙에 관한 국회법에 대한 개정안 발의는 국회선진화법 이후에도 여전히 철저하게 정파적 고려만이 중요하다는 점에서 제도보다는 정당 지도부의 지도력과 그들의 타협 의지가 국회 갈등 해결의 핵심이라는 함의를 도출한다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.307-322
• /
• 2015

In most democratic countries, influential professional interest groups often become a part of the iron triangle in the policy making process. One of the typical methods by which professional interest groups participate in policy making process may be by having interest group members in the national assembly, who are sympathetic to the group, implementing policies through legislation. In this study we found that from the Constitutional National Assembly through the 18th National Assembly, 147 members of the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea have been ex health care professionals. The research analyzed the roles of these members in health care law amendments as requested by the professional organizations. This study analyzed 11 major cases that involved nullification or amendment of legislations in favor of the healthcare profession, against the basic policies of the government. The study showed that in the 11 major cases, policies were amended in the direction intended by the National Assembly members and other organizations with similar interests, which was against the policy stance of the government. However, these cases did not unilaterally imply that the National Assembly has been captured by the interest groups through the legislators with health care professional background; rather, they should be perceived to be influenced by the exhibited loss of governability by the government in respect to healthcare policy decisions, loss of initiative due to lack of controllability, and reversals and inconsistencies of the policies.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.181-190
• /
• 2019

Today, in the information society, since the government administration of all countries places importance on clarity and efficiency, the authority concentration of the administration is inevitable. Therefore, the Parliament, which is a legislative body, is at a time when the policy control function to check and monitor it is becoming more important. In particular, due to the emergence of parliamentary democracy, in the reality that the people must elect representatives and represent their own opinions, the parliamentary inspection system is very valuable in that it satisfies the right of the people to know and ultimately enables the people to democratically control the administration. The role of the Parliament moves from the inherent legislative function to the information collection and disclosure of government administration, discussion and resolution of political issues, and observation and supervision of the administration. And it can be seen as the global trend. As a result of this trend, status and role of the National Assembly is being strengthened from the legislative body to the control agency of government administration. Thus, the most substantive authority of Article 61 of the Constitution can be deemed the parliamentary inspection system. The parliamentary inspection system is a system that let exercise the legislation, budget, and authority to control of state administration by identify the challenges and policy implementation of each country's institutions through the audit of the executive administration's overall government administration performance outside the National Assembly. However, due to the amendment of Constitution in 1988, the parliamentary inspection right and investigation of state administration right had reinstated and the parliamentary inspection system, which is being implemented annually, is the 31st year of the year in 2019. However, the general evaluation of the public is negative and insufficient time for inspections, lack of sanctions on nonattendance witnesses, excessive data submission, and refusal to submit materials by the administration were pointed out as the problem. Therefore, in this paper, the researcher tries to point out the overall problems of the parliamentary inspection system and to summarize the effective improvement plans.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.131-141
• /
• 2013

Matters related to the right to be forgotten started the dispute Europe to introduce it first when Data Protection Directive established in 1995 proceeded revision. Relating to this, diverse disputes proceed on responding to personal information protection and internet laws in our nation. Especially as our National Assembly submitted the law regarding the promotion of information and communication network use and protection of information and amendment of copyright, it is necessary to look into the movement on introduction of law of right to be forgotten closely in detail. EU which attempted the institutionalization for the first time, relating to review of General Data Protection Regulation, proposed opinions such as the necessity to define subjects of personal information concretely and specifically and or protection target and balanced consideration on freedom of expression which is constitutional value. In the case of our nation, there was legislation attempt to introduce the regulation but it was limited in the form of fallen effectiveness without concrete and detailed review on internet law. To solve such problems, it is necessary to look into issues and matters to be considered required to accept right to be forgotten closely and discuss possibility of introducing right to be forgotten, conflicts between fundamental rights becoming issue, effect of goal achievement of personal information protection through the system introduction, and other rational acceptance method.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.131-160
• /
• 2023

상시적 대면진료를 허용하는 것을 내용으로 하는 의료법 개정안이 제21대 국회에서 5건이 발의되었으나 각 개정안마다 중점적으로 다루는 내용에 차이가 있고, 비대면진료에 대한 의료계의 반대 입장, 정치적 상황 등이 맞물려 현재 '계속 심사' 안건으로 계류되어 있는 상태이다. 그러나 비대면진료의 안전성 확보의 첫 단계로서 의료법 개정이 반드시 필요하다는 공감대를 형성하였고, 비대면진료에 대한 정부의 추진 의지가 강한 상황이므로 머지않아 의료법은 개정될 가능성이 높다. 다만, 비대면진료 도입은 환자의 안전성 확보를 최우선으로 하는 방향으로 제도화, 입법 되어야 한다는 관점에서, 비대면진료의 대상 환자는 재진 환자 중심, 대상 질환은 만성질환 중심, 시행기관은 의원급 의료기관 중심, 비대면진료 수단은 최소한 화상시스템으로 제한, 의료인의 법적 책임은 의료인의 통제 범위 밖의 요인에 의한 사고에 대해서는 책임면제, 대면진료 요구권 마련 등의 방향성을 제안하였다. 최소한의 안전성을 확보할 수 있는 기준을 우선 입법하고, 향후 연구와 평가 등을 통해 비대면진료의 범위를 확대하는 것과 같이 단계적으로 접근하는 것이 바람직하다.

• 기록학연구
• /
• 제47호
• /
• pp.197-225
• /
• 2016

우리 기록공동체는 규제완화를 명분으로 기록관리의 본령을 위축시키고자 하는 시도에 지속적으로 대응해왔으며, 이런 시도들을 현안이라고 불러왔다. 2015년에는 민간시설이 공공기관의 기록물보존업무를 수행하도록 허용하는 것을 골자로 하는 공공기록법 개정안이 현안이 되었다. '공공기관의 기록물관리 효율성을 제고'한다는 법 개정 이유 등 주요 쟁점을 놓고 주요 이해관계당사자들의 입장과 해석이 달라 큰 혼란이 야기되었다. 이 개정안은 2016년 1월 현재 국회에 계류 중이며, 이번에 통과되지 않을 수도 있다. 그러나 이와 유사한 이러한 위험한 시도가 계속될 것으로 예측된다. 따라서 이 논문은 '민간시설 활성화를 위한 공공기록법 개정 현안'의 진행과정에서 드러난 주요 쟁점을 검토하고, 향후 과제를 확인하기 위한 목적으로 작성되었다. 진행경과를 살펴보고, 쟁점사항을 검토한 후, (1) 균형 있는 기록생태계의 발전, (2) 전자기록 관리체제의 검토, (3) 공공기록법의 선제적 정비, 그리고 (4) 기록공동체 내부의 소통방식 개선 등의 향후 과제를 제안하였다.

• 의정연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.67-88
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 지방교육자치에 관한 법률 전부개정법률안(대안)에 대한 국회의 표결에 있어 국회의원에 영향을 미친 요인은 무엇인지 알아보는 것을 목적으로 한다. 지방교육자치에 관한 법률 전부개정법률안(대안)이 관심을 끄는 것은 교육감과 교육위원에 대한 직접 선거 및 교육위원회 시·도의회 상임위원회 전환 등을 주요 내용으로 하고 있기 때문이다. 또한 이 법안은 위원회 이름으로 발의된 법안이며 특정 정당 및 지역의 반대가 있었던 법안이 아님에도 이에 대한 수정안이 제출되었고, 국회에서 통과된 다른 법안과 달리 반대표가 상대적으로 많았기 때문이다. 이러한 이유로 의원들의 투표는 무엇에 영향을 받았는지 분석을 시도하였다. 투표행태 분석을 통해 법안의 통과에 있어 중요한 것은 교섭단체 간 합의며, 특히 국회 다수당의 선택이 매우 중요하다는 점을 알 수 있었다. 또한 분석을 통해 의정경험이 많은 의원과 비례대표 의원들은 교섭단체 간 합의된 법안에 좀 더 순응하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 전자투표제 실시 이후 학자들의 관심을 끌고 있는 의원들의 투표행태를 좀 더 구체적으로 이해할 수 있는 기회를 제공했다는 점에 의미가 있다고 하겠다.