• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2023.10a
• /
• pp.95-100
• /
• 2023

끊임없이 재생산되는 혐오 표현의 정확한 탐지를 위해서는 혐오란 무엇인가에 대한 본질적인 이해가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 화용론에서 사용되는 적정성 조건이라는 분석 틀을 활용하여 모델이 '혐오하기' 화행을 어떻게 인식하고 있는지 평가하고자 했다. 혐오 화행의 적정성 조건을 명제 내용 조건, 예비 조건, 성실성 조건, 본질 조건으로 나누어 분석하였으며, 이를 진위형, 연결형, 단답형, 논술형 문항으로 구성했다. 그 결과 모든 문항 유형에서 50점이 넘는 점수를 받았으나 비교적 고차원인 사고 능력을 측정하는 단답형과 논술형 문항 유형의 점수가 가장 낮게 나타났다.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.143
• /
• pp.189-214
• /
• 2017

Disgust is caused by human being incompleteness and also its denial. Therefore the understanding of disgust is concerned with the understanding of humans. Thinking critically about disgust, we can solve the problems of disgust and reflect on our limitations. I will refer to Nussbaum's view which finds out in "projective disgust" an antipathy to human fault and a wish for completeness. This article is interested in the fact that disgust is not only a rejective feeling of a person but also a collective emotion which is connected with an antagonistic relationship and power exercise. Specifically, this article focuses on the point that disgust is mobilized to maintain a dominative relationship between humans. This is associated with the inner characteristics of disgust because disgust in itself contains a one-sided perspective, exclusiveness, hierarchy, and domination. This article aims to reveal a collusion between disgust and domination. For the purpose we will pay attention to two basic inclinations which are immanent in disgust; purity and exclusion, while relying on Nussbaum's view of disgust. In accordance with this analysis, this article will specificity treat disgust which can be summarized as an ideological function of emotion and its violent tendency. Then, we can ensure that disgust threats the equal and dignitary worth of human beings and hinders the diversity and rationality of a liberal society. In addition, it will be emphasized that disgust should not be used as an ideology which discriminates and suppresses a specific group in a society.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2021.10a
• /
• pp.518-523
• /
• 2021

챗봇과 같은 대화형 에이전트 사용이 증가하면서 채팅에서의 혐오 표현 사용도 더불어 증가하고 있다. 혐오 표현을 자동으로 탐지하려는 노력은 다양하게 시도되어 왔으나, 챗봇 데이터를 대상으로 한 혐오 표현 탐지 연구는 여전히 부족한 실정이다. 이 연구는 혐오 표현을 포함한 챗봇-사용자 대화 데이터 35만 개에 한국어 말뭉치로 학습된 KoELETRA 기반 혐오 탐지 모델을 적용하여, 챗봇-사람 데이터셋에서의 혐오 표현 탐지의 성능과 한계점을 검토하였다. KoELECTRA 혐오 표현 분류 모델은 챗봇 데이터셋에 대해 가중 평균 F1-score 0.66의 성능을 보였으며, 오탈자에 대한 취약성, 맥락 미반영으로 인한 편향 강화, 가용한 데이터의 정확도 문제가 주요한 한계로 포착되었다. 이 연구에서는 실험 결과에 기반해 성능 향상을 위한 방향성을 제시한다.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.79
• /
• pp.165-195
• /
• 2016

This paper aims to examine the third-person effect(TPE) of hate comments on online news, and analyze how the issue-relevant audience factors as well as the characteristics of the online message have influence on the TPE. More specifically, based on the distinction between hateful and logical comments regarding the issue of illegal immigration, the authors have conducted an online experiment that compares how the message-related features, i.e., ways of expressing the ideas, lead to the difference in TPE. Analysis was also conducted with regards to how political orientation and discriminatory predisposition to immigrants among the audiences, have different impacts on the TPE. The 479 participants in the experiments were randomly assigned to experimental group(exposed to hate comments) or control group(exposed to logical comments). The results reveal that the TPE of hate comments is higher than that of logical message. The same message proved to be more effective for news users with liberal orientation and discriminatory predisposition. The significance of this paper lies in that it has examined the effect of online hate comments in a rigorous experimental setting. Also the research further elaborated on the audience-related variables, for which the previous studies tended to focus those on the general psychological level rather than relate them more specifically to the issues.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.39 no.1
• /
• pp.331-350
• /
• 2022

This study aims to understand topics of incivility related to COVID-19 from analyzing Twitter posts including COVID-19-related hate speech. To achieve the goal, a total of 63,802 tweets that were created between December 1st, 2019, and August 31st, 2021, covering three targets of hate speech including region and public facilities, groups of people, and religion were analyzed. Frequency analysis, dynamic topic modeling, and keyword co-occurrence network analysis were used to explore topics and keywords. 1) Results of frequency analysis revealed that hate against regions and public facilities showed a relatively increasing trend while hate against specific groups of people and religion showed a relatively decreasing trend. 2) Results of dynamic topic modeling analysis showed keywords of each of the three targets of hate speech. Keywords of the region and public facilities included "Daegu, Gyeongbuk local hate", "interregional hate", and "public facility hate"; groups of people included "China hate", "virus spreaders", and "outdoor activity sanctions"; and religion included "Shincheonji", "Christianity", "religious infection", "refusal of quarantine", and "places visited by confirmed cases". 3) Similarly, results of keyword co-occurrence network analysis revealed keywords of three targets: region and public facilities (Corona, Daegu, confirmed cases, Shincheonji, Gyeongbuk, region); specific groups of people (Coronavirus, Wuhan pneumonia, Wuhan, China, Chinese, People, Entry, Banned); and religion (Corona, Church, Daegu, confirmed cases, infection). This study attempted to grasp the public's anti-citizenship public opinion related to COVID-19 by identifying domestic COVID-19 hate targets and keywords using social media. In particular, it is meaningful to grasp public opinion on incivility topics and hate emotions expressed on social media using data mining techniques for hate-related to COVID-19, which has not been attempted in previous studies. In addition, the results of this study suggest practical implications in that they can be based on basic data for contributing to the establishment of systems and policies for cultural communication measures in preparation for the post-COVID-19 era.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.537-567
• /
• 2023

This study compared the nature of disgust caused by the crime scene with that by the stereotype of the sexual-minority defendant, and compared the effect of each type of disgust on evidence evaluation and legal judgment. A total of 600 participants (300 men, average age of 44.40) were randomly assigned to sources of disgust (crime scene, sexual minorities defendant, control condition), the existence of additional evidence of innocence (o/x), and the existence of judicial directives (o/x). As a result of the study, disgust under the condition of a cruel crime scene with strong physical disgust was significantly higher than that of the sexual minority defendant, interpreted the evidence in a more guilty direction, and was more prone to_evaluate that the defendant was guilty. It is noteworthy that evidence evaluation was a significant moderating variable between disgust and probability of guilt under conditions where the source of disgust was a sexual minority, but not under control conditions and crime scene condition. It means that the effect of disgust on legal judgment may not be direct when the defendant is a sexual minority. In addition, the existence of the judicial instruction had a significant inverse effect on the sentence. And simple effect analysis found that presenting judicial instruction lowered probability of guilt only under the control condition. This makes it reasonable to infer that disgust derived from the characteristics of the crime scene and the defendant can be recognized as integral emotions that are difficult to correct with instructions. Finally, pity for the defendant was significantly higher under the conditions of sexual minority which shows that an emotional response of sympathy may occur in addition to disgust for sexual minorities. After examining the nature of disgust (physical & moral), legal judgment according to the source and degree of disgust was reviewed. In addition, the meaning of disgust and sympathy for the sexual minority defendant was discussed.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.499-510
• /
• 2020

This study aims to analyze the causes of Internet hate speech, which has recently been emerging as a serious social problem and to seek for countermeasures. The experiences of hate speech are examined through the analysis of college students' essays and the causes and solutions of hate speech are suggested through the in-depth interviews with the experts. College students experience hate speech on the Internet on the basis of attributes such as age, gender, sexual orientation, and regionalism. Online comments on news, social media and online games are the main sources in spreading hate speech. On a personal level the lack of awareness of human dignity and the absence of media education are diagnosed as the reasons for online hate speech. The social reasons for online hate speech lie in the lack of human rights education and the problems of the media. In order to improve the problems of Internet hate speech, various suggestions are proposed on the legal, social and educational levels.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.56 no.4
• /
• pp.431-453
• /
• 2022

Hate is a collective expression of exclusivity toward others and it is fostered and reproduced through false public perception. This study aims to explore the objects and issues of hate discussed in our society using text mining techniques. To this end, we collected 17,867 news data published from 1990 to 2020 and constructed a co-word network and cluster analysis. In order to derive an explicit co-word network highly related to hate, we carried out sentence split and extracted a total of 52,520 sentences containing the words 'hate', 'prejudice' and 'discrimination' in the preprocessing phase. As a result of analyzing the frequency of words in the collected news data, the subjects that appeared most frequently in relation to hate in our society were women, race, and sexual minorities, and the related issues were related laws and crimes. As a result of cluster analysis based on the co-word network, we found a total of six hate-related clusters. The largest cluster was 'genderphobic', accounting for 41.4% of the total, followed by 'sexual minority hatred' at 28.7%, 'racial hatred' at 15.1%, 'selective hatred' at 8.5%, 'political hatred' accounted for 5.7% and 'environmental hatred' accounted for 0.3%. In the discussion, we comprehensively extracted all specific hate target names from the collected news data, which were not specifically revealed as a result of the cluster analysis.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.10-15
• /
• 2022

온라인상에서 발생하는 혐오 표현은 사회가 직면한 주요 문제 중 하나이다. 이러한 필요성에 입각해, 최근 인공지능을 활용하여 발화에 대한 교화 목적을 가진 대응 발화 쌍을 통해 혐오 표현에 대한 실질적인 완화를 진행하는 연구들이 생겨나고 있다. 그러나 각 혐오 표현에 적합한 대응 발화의 구축은 다수의 전문 인력이 요구되므로 데이터를 구축함에 있어 시간과 비용이 많이 소요되며 대응 발화 생성 또한 어려운 문제로 여겨진다. 해당 문제를 완화하기위해, 본 논문은 사전에 기 구축되어 있는 혐오 표현 데이터를 기반으로 의미 기반 검색을 적용하여 자동으로 데이터를 증강할 수 있는 쉽고 빠른 데이터 증강 방법론을 제안한다. 제안하는 프로세스의 타당성과 증강된 문장의 효과를 검증하기 위해 사전학습 모델을 기반으로 비교 실험을 진행하였다. 실험 결과, 제안하는 프로세스를 적용하였을 시, 그렇지 않은 모델 대비 높은 폭의 성능 향상을 보였다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.22 no.11
• /
• pp.1481-1488
• /
• 2018

As female gamers are rapidly increasing, the misogyny and the misandry in game playing situation are also increasing. Recent #Gamergate and GodGunbae incident exhibit that such discriminative/hate behaviour in game playing can be developed into real physical threat or crime. In this paper, we investigate and analyze young Korean game players on how the attackers group, victims group, and gender-issue-indifferent group behave differently in game playing through survey. We found that male gamers had high hostile sexism against female gamers especially on females' game attitude and streotyped hatred with respect to the gender ${\times}$ group interaction. In big-5 personality test, however, it is not clear if attackers and victims had a noticeable different personality patterns. In result, we verify that there exist gender stereotype and high hostile sexism among young Korean gamers. Active gender-equality education on their adolescent period is necessary to avoid such destructive hatred in game playing.