• Proceedings of the Korea Association of Information Systems Conference
• /
• 2005.12a
• /
• pp.185-193
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 항만클러스터에 대한 온라인과 오프라인의 융합요소를 도출하고 이러한 융합요소가 항만클러스터의 성공에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 분석하였다. 온라인과 오프라인의 융합요소에는 첫째, 정보화, IT화, e-transformation화 수준 등을 포함하는 e-비즈니스화 정도 둘째, B2B 전자상거래 수준 셋째, 관련 온라인기업들의 활성화 수준, 넷째, 항만클러스터에 특화된 e-비즈니스 지원 산업 수준 그리고 마지막으로 E-Logistics 수준 등이 있다. 항만클러스터의 오프라인 요소와 온라인 요소가 융합됨에 따라 얻어지는 효익항목, 항만클러스터 SCM 가치사슬 구성요인에 대한 항목, 그리고 항만클러스터에 속한 기업이 얻을 수 있는 성과항목에 대한 요인을 추출하기 위하여 요인분석을 행하였으며, 요인분석에서 추출된 온라인과 오프라인의 융합요소가 거시적인 측면에서 항만클러스터 SCM 가치사슬 요인과 미시적인 측면에서 클러스터내의 개별기업 성공에 어떠한 영향을 미치는가를 분석하기 위하여 회귀분석을 수행하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2007.12a
• /
• pp.257-258
• /
• 2007

급변하는 동북아 항만물류환경 속에서 부산항이 동북아 물류중심지로 발전할 수 있는 방안을 모색하기 위해서 SWOT/AHP 분석을 이용하여 부산지역 항만물류클러스터를 둘러싸고 있는 대내외적인 환경 중 중요한 요인들을 파악하여 각 요인들에 대해 쌍대비교 평가를 수행한 후 우선순위를 도출하여 부산지역 항만물류클러스터를 발전시킬 수 있는 전략적 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 도출된 우선순위를 바탕으로 전략수립의 단계는 제시하였지만, 전략별 세부추진방안은 구체적으로 제시하지 못하여 차후 연구가 수행되어야 할 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.05a
• /
• pp.131-132
• /
• 2018

해양산업은 새로운 부가가치산업 및 신성장동력 산업으로 인식되고 있다. 특히 항만을 중심으로 클러스터를 조성하여 고부가가치를 창출하고 있다. 해외 선진항만들도 앞 다투어 클러스터를 조성하여 수익창출과 경쟁력 강화에 나서고 있다. 우리나라도 2015년 해양산업클러스터 조성과 육성에 관한 법률을 제정하였다. 따라서 각 지역별로 어떤 해양산업이 비교우위에 있는지 파악하는 것은 해양산업클러스터를 통한 집적화 전략을 수립하는데 매우 중요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 남지역을 대상으로 해양산업 구조를 분석하였다. 먼저 해양산업 분류에 대한 기존 문헌분석을 실시하여 해운 물류업, 조선업, 수산업, 해양관광업, 기타업 5개의 대분류와 21개 중분류, 84개 소분류로 해양산업을 재분류하였다. 재분류한 해양산업을 기준으로 입지계수와 변이할당분석 기법을 활용하여 전남의 해양산업 구조를 분석하였다. 이 연구결과는 향후 전남지역 해양산업클러스터 구축 시 전략수립에 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.19-38
• /
• 2019

The Seosan-Daesan Port is closest to the major ports of China; hence, it is recognized as the ideal port for trade with China. Well-developed industrial infrastructure in its hinterland, including petrochemical, automotive, and electronic component complexes and recent developments of port facilities that aim to strengthen its function as a commercial port clearly highlight the necessity to develop it as a comprehensive port by building a marine industrial cluster. In this study, prerequisites for marine industrial cluster development in Seosan-Daesan Port are identified; they include the following. First, the conditions to be met for being designated a marine industrial cluster should be amended; Second, the central government should delegate authority to local governments to ensure the development of marine industries; Third, changes related to marine industrial cluster development in the governance structure of local governments (Seosan City and Chungnam Province) are required; and Last, a consultative body should be established to facilitate discussions on developing a marine industrial cluster in Seosan-Daesan Port and build public consensus.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.327-332
• /
• 2005

This paper aims to analysis for evaluation factor and success prediction of port innovative cluster. This paper is divided three factors such ac policy, source and operation. In addition, three factors are divided into the twelve detail factors. the weight of each factor is calculated by Kohonen Network. At the result, this paper places the priority on the source factor.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2012

As more manufacturing and global businesses are being pulled into the port area, the idea of a Port Business Valley (PBV) is being pondered as it would create jobs and added value. The PBV would be centered around the harbor and be connected to the port, a logistics district, an industrial district, and the city. The resulting domestic and foreign investment in logistics, industry, business, tourism, living, etc. would vitalize the geographical characteristics of Incheon Port. It would also generate the largest amount of ripple effects between industries in the PBV. However, up until recently, the most frequently offered examples of planning that have helped logistics of a port to grow that have used a PBV have been those of Busan New Port and Gwangyang Port. However, this study is the result of the recent inception of the idea of creating a PBV centered around Incheon Port and the need for experts to develop a plan for such a PBV in Incheon by conducting a site specific study. The aim of this study is to set up the concept of PBV and establish PBV model of Incheon Port. In addition, this study identifies construct factors and their strategies for establish PBV of Incheon Port and then, shows the key factors and related-strategies on Fuzzy-AHP analysis from a survey of logistics experts with Incheon Port.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.275-285
• /
• 2008

The "logistics industry" is recommended as an economic growth power in the future in Korea. In the past, Korea has handled China's freight volume overflow as a transfer hub. However, recently China has been constructing its own port facilities and many mega fleets have been moving to China's ports. As a result, the position of Korea's hub-ports facing a crisis. Now, new strategies are necessary for renovating Korea's logistics industry and international competitiveness. This study proposes a "value-added logistics cluster" as a new strategy. In particular, this study proposes a Korean value-added logistics cluster that maximizes Korea's locational and industrial advantages. Additionally, a model for a value-added logistics cluster is proposed for the rehabilitation of Korea's ports as logistics hubs in Northeast Asia. Many analyses are executed step-by-step to develop a Korean value-added logistics cluster model, such as an analysis of the relationship between the logistics industry and other industries for the definition of cluster components. Lastly, the Korean value-added logistics cluster model is applied to Kwangyang port, which is currently confronted with a crisis because of the decrease of freight volume.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.39 no.1
• /
• pp.131-147
• /
• 2023

Gwangyang Port Marine Industry Cluster is the only marine industry cluster in Korea that is currently in operation, but despite the implementation of various revitalization policies since its opening, the occupancy rate has been low so far. Accordingly, this study aims to identify the constraints of the current system that hinder the inducement of tenant companies and to suggest revitalization measures. For this purpose, this study analyzed the current status of research and development(R&D) projects in the port, shipping and logistics sector, which is a core industry of the Gwangyang Port Marine Industry Cluster. And a survey was conducted on companies with potential to move in. As a result, the proportion of R&D in the core industry sectors is lower than in other sectors, and most of R&D projects are being carried out mainly by small and medium-sized enterprises. In addition, the low need for port facilities and low accessibility to Gwangyang Port were derived as constraints. Considering the results, this study suggests four revitalization measures to induce tenant companies as follows. First, it is necessary to expand the scope of core industries from the current shipping, ports, and logistics to the entire maritime and fisheries, so that companies performing R&D in the industry can move in. Second, the industry code currently specified as a qualification need to be revised to include both the industry of the enterprise carrying out R&D projects and the core industry. Therefore, this study suggests an expanded industry code list that can replace current list. Third, a transition of tenant recruitment system from the regular system(once or twice a year) to the occasional system is proposed so that companies can move in flexibly when demand arises. Finally, in order to overcome geographically low accessibility, technology development support projects specialized in R&D that prospective tenant companies actually need are needed rather than financial support.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.237-255
• /
• 2008

This paper aims to clarify if clustering effects among industries exist and if port-industry clustering effects exist. A knock-down approach was used in a survey and 16 industries were categorized. We defined which industry is more competitive in industry clusters and port-industry clusters. Another survey to experts was carried out to identify which industry is more appropriate to one of the three ports in Sudokwon (Seoul Metropolitan Areas): Incheon port, Pyungtaik port and Dangjin port. Five manufacturing industries are selected considering port-industry clustering relationships in this area and Analytic Hierarch Process was used for a pairwise comparison. Locational, social and economic factors are selected for 1st level. A result shows that Incheon port is more competitive in petroleum manufacturing, primary metal manufacturing and rubber and plastic manufacturing and Pyeontaik port is more competitive in metal assembly manufacturing and automobile and trailer manufacturing. However, sensitivity analysis shows a turnover of ranking in some industries. As there exist slight differences among three ports, cooperation is necessary when the government and Port Authorities make plans.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.147-168
• /
• 2019

This paper explores strategies for building an automobile logistics cluster in PyeongtaekDangjin Port, which needs to be developed and operated for automobile related value-added logistics services. The future of Korean automobile exports seems gloomy, but many domestic ports, including PyeongtaekDangjin Port, are struggling to secure a position as automobile ports by expanding port facilities to attract exports and transshipment vehicles. PyeongtaekDangjin Port is currently the best automobile port as it is under good conditions for building an automobile logistics cluster. Ssangyong Motor Co., Kia Motors Corp., Samsung Electronics Co., and LG Electronics Inc., which are located nearby, can secure enough land to build an automobile logistics cluster by developing a port distribution complex in the future. This will promote the sustainable development of PyeongtaekDangjin Port by creating a logistics hub, specifically an automobile logistics hub, which would allow diverse cultures and experiences to respond appropriately to future mobility development.