• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2022.06a
• /
• pp.227-229
• /
• 2022

국제물류주선업 실태분석 및 경쟁력 제고 방향 연구 실시

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.30 no.10 s.116
• /
• pp.809-817
• /
• 2006

Shipping and ports have important roles as the nodes and links in maritime logistics. The environment between shipping and ports is interrelated and has been changing' together. Recently, the changes of shipping and ports are rapidly in progress and it is expected to be developed complementarily. Especially, mega carriers reduce the number of ports of calls because the size of ships is becoming bigger and bigger and the 'hub and spokes' strategy is appeared. Therefore, the position of a hub port by the region has questioned This paper aims to research the competitive ports by the region on the basis of the patterns when mega carriers call at ports. Six regions, Far East, Southeast Asia, Northwest America, Northeast America, West Europe and Mediterranean, are organized for this research. According to the volume of cargoes, the top five ports of each region are analyzed. As a result, the competitive ports by the region are Shanghai, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, New York New Jersey, Rotterdam and Gioia Tauro.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.177-184
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study is to identify and evaluate the competitiveness of container ports in ASEAN(Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and Korea, which plays a leading role in basing the hub of international logistics strategies at the onset of the 21st century. Its ultimate purpose is to consider the relevant policy-making by comparing the competitiveness of ASEAN and Korea's container ports. This paper adopted the HFP method, which is an empirical analysis that evaluated the port competitiveness by quantifying it a, a qualitative attribute in the aforementioned area, where both ASEAN and Korea vie with each other for increasing container throughput. The results of this study showed that Singapore ranked the first in the subject of study in view of the competitiveness, followed by Busan(2) and Manila(2) as a leading group of the relevant ports in international logistics strategies. This analytic evaluation contributes to the empirical approach applied to policy-making by the HFP method, which is the newest research technique in social science through the comparative study of port competitiveness between ASEAN and Korea.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association for Survey Research Conference
• /
• 2003.06a
• /
• pp.140-160
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to identify and evaluate the competitiveness of ports in ASEAN(Association of Southeast Asian Nations), which plays a leading role in basing the hub of international logistics strategies as a countermeasure in changes of international logistics environments. This region represents most severe competition among Mega hub ports in the world in terms of container cargo throughput at the onset of the 21st century. The research method in this study accounted for over lapping between attributes, and introduced the HFP method that can perform mathematical operations. The scope of this study was strictly confined to the ports of ASEAN, which cover the top 100 of 350 container ports that were presented in Containerization International Yearbook 2002 wi th reference to container throughput. The results of this study show Singapore in the number one position. Even compared with major ports in Korea (after getting comparative ratings and applying tile same data and evaluation structure), the number one position still goes to Singapore and then Busan(2) and Manila(2), followed by Port Klang(4), Tanjung Priok(5), Tanjung Perak(6), Bangkok(7), Inchon(8), Laem Chabang(9) and Penang(9). In terms of the main contributions of this study, it is the first empirical study to apply the combined at tributes of detailed and representative attributes into the advanced HFP model which was enhanced by the KJ method to evaluate the port competitiveness in ASEAN. Up-to-now, none have comprehensively conducted researches with sophisticated port methodology that has discussed a variety of changes in port development and terminal transfers of major shipping lines. Moreover, through the comparative evaluation among major ports in Korea and ASEAN, the presentation of comparative competitiveness for Korean ports is a great achievement in this study. In order to reinforce this study, it needs further compensative research, including cost factors which could not be applied to modeling the subject ports by lack of consistently qualified data in ASEAN.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.35 no.8
• /
• pp.667-675
• /
• 2011

As the annual growth rate of port handling container volume in Korea has faced slowdown, this paper attempts to find strategies for the domestic container terminal operators in order to enhance competitiveness. For this, the model of using AHP and the fuzzy set theory is used for evaluating competitiveness between domestic and global container terminal operators. The evaluation model hierarchy is developed based on SERM(subject-environment-resource-mechanism) theory of business strategy. The results show domestic operators are ranked lower than global player so that they particularly pay attention to the areas of scale of economy, business diversification, and globalization strategy.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.32 no.8
• /
• pp.667-674
• /
• 2008

In this paper, operational problems of Busan Port and competitiveness deciding factors are analyzed by field data research and interview with employees in shipping companies and terminal operation companies. In the analysis, the problems Busan Port currently has are identified as follows: 1) low price competitiveness, 2) Lack of new port back facilities and connecting transportion system 3) Lack of operation ability of container terminal 4) Inefficient pour labor supply system. In order to strengthen the competitiveness and leap up to a hub port in North East Asia, Busan port is investigated to enhance below requirements. 1) Hiring more equipment and increase productivity in terminal 2) Integrating terminal operation companies to react maximization of vessel 3) Maintaining cost advantages 4)Proactively inviting global carriers to participate in the terminal operation 5)Making business environment for Global Terminal Operator to participate in the terminal operation in order to take advantage of their global marketing power.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.173-178
• /
• 2008

Asian container market, expecially in the NEA(Northeast Asia) region, has been growing continuously according to international specialization of manufacturers. The circumstances surrounding port industry has also been changing rapidly. Global liner and GTO( Global Terminal Operators} have strengthen there market share with M&A and increased entry to Asia market. The competition in NEA have deepen with change of circumstance and the growth of Chinese ports while Busan port decreasing its growth rate and market share. Therefore, this study analysed the change of the port concentration in NEA and the positioning of Busan port by year. In the result, the competitive position of Busan port weakening continuously and loss much volume to competition port, and it suggests that a globalization strategy is essential for making sure of competitiveness based on the result of this paper.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2013.10a
• /
• pp.11-12
• /
• 2013

수리조선산업은 기술 및 노동집약적 산업으로 기계, 철강, 전기전자, 화학 등 연관산업에 대한 생산 유발효과 및 고용효과가 높은 산업이다. 또한 연계 산업에 대한 직접적인 생산증가 효과와 선원 체류에 따른 부가가치 증가 등의 부수효과를 함께 고려할 때 지역경제에 대한 기여도가 높은 산업적 역할을 수행하고 있으며, 특히 부산 경남 울산 지역은 세계 5위권 전후에 해당하는 해운물동량을 처리하는 입지조건과 신조선 분야 1위의 우수한 기술 및 노동력을 보유하고 있다. 이러한 긍정적인 측면에도 불구하고 여러 요인들로 인해 수리조선산업이 경쟁력이 확보되지 못하고 있는 실정이며, 2013년 들면서 부산항의 컨테이너 물동량 실적이 7위로 하락하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 부산항을 중심으로 수리조선산업 공급망 관리를 위하여 정보화 네트워크 구축사례를 분석하고, 이를 통하여 수리조선산업 정보화 네트워크의 성공적인 구축 방안을 모색하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2009.10a
• /
• pp.208-209
• /
• 2009

전남 서남권은 동남권 지역에 이어 제 2의 조선산업 클러스터를 위한 산업기반 구축이 진행되고 있다. 전남 조선산업의 유연성과 불황기 대처능력을 제고하고 한국 및 전남권의 항만 개발에 따른 수리조선 수요에 대처하기 위해, 전라남도는 수리조선산업 진출을 검토하고 있는 바, 전남 지역의 수리조선 경쟁력을 분석하였다. 수리조선산업의 산업적 특정과 수리조선 수요 결정 요인을 고찰하고, 유럽, 싱가포르, 중동, 중국 등 주요 수리조선국 사례의 시사점을 토대로 전라남도의 입지 여건, 비용 및 기술력을 종합적으로 검토하였으며, 부산 등 동남권 지역의 주요 거점용 물론 전남 지역 내의 후보지에 대한 비교 분석을 수행하였다.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.79-101
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to identify key factors of Co-opetition through examining the environmental and structural changes in the ports industry and suggest a few Co-opetition strategies for enhancing our ports capabilities in the long-term. In recent years, the trend toward market liberalization and globalization in ports industry has made rapid progress and it made the competition fiercer. To survive in this rapid changes, the ports have traditionally pursed a competitive strategy. However, an alternative strategy replacing the traditional strategy was introduced: namely, 'Co-opetition' a buzzword combining competition and co operation. Policy proposals this study suggests are the construction of a database regarding costs and benefits of ports for more effective analysis and improving the competitive power of a shipping company operating national flag carriers for achieving the purpose of Co-opetition and adoption of selection and concentration strategy for increasing the possibility of Co-opetition success.