Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Evaluation of Competitiveness for Container Terminal Operators

컨테이너터미널 운영사의 기업경쟁력 평가에 관한 연구

  • Ko, Hyun-Jeung (Department of Logistics, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Kil, Kwang-Soo (Division of Maritime Industry Research, Korea Maritime Institute)
  • Received : 2011.08.26
  • Accepted : 2011.10.17
  • Published : 2011.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the annual growth rate of port handling container volume in Korea has faced slowdown, this paper attempts to find strategies for the domestic container terminal operators in order to enhance competitiveness. For this, the model of using AHP and the fuzzy set theory is used for evaluating competitiveness between domestic and global container terminal operators. The evaluation model hierarchy is developed based on SERM(subject-environment-resource-mechanism) theory of business strategy. The results show domestic operators are ranked lower than global player so that they particularly pay attention to the areas of scale of economy, business diversification, and globalization strategy.

본 연구는 최근 우리나라 항만 물동량 증가세가 둔화되고 있는 가운데 국내 컨테이너터미널 운영기업의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 방안을 마련하고자 기업경쟁력 평가모형을 제시하고 글로벌 터미널 운영사와 비교분석하였다. 기업경쟁력 분석을 위한 퍼지모형은 퍼지이론과 AHP를 활용하였다. 경쟁력 평가를 위한 계층적 구조는 SERM 모형을 활용하였는바, 이는 기업의 성장이 주체(Subject), 환경(Environment), 자원(Resource), 그리고 메커니즘(Mechanism)의 상호작용 과정에서 형성된다는 논리에 바탕을 두고 있다. 분석결과 우리나라 컨테이너터미널 운영기업의 경쟁력은 글로벌 기업에 비해 전반적으로 약한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 기업의 대형화, 사업 다각화, 글로벌 전략수립이 시급한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김율성(2005), 컨테이너 선사의 항만선택 결정모형에 관한 연구, 한국해양대학교 박사학위논문.
  2. 김태원, 곽규석, 남기찬(2006), 지역별 항만 경쟁력 분석: 컨테이너 정기선사의 항만 기항 패턴을 중심으로, 한국항해항만학회, 제30권 제10호, pp.809-817. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2006.30.10.809
  3. 류진국(1995), 무한경쟁 vs 경쟁전략, 국제기업전략연구소, pp.215-234.
  4. 박찬정(2001), 기업의 성과측정과 경쟁력 평가를 위한 퍼지모형, 회계연구, 제 6권 제2호, pp.107-133.
  5. 여기태, 이홍걸, 오세웅(2004), 중소형항만의 화주유인 증대를 위한 항만선택요소 추출에 관한 연구, 해운물류연구, 43, pp.33-53.
  6. 이홍걸, 여기태, 류형근(2004), 한.중 항만경쟁력 구성요소 및 결정요소 도출에 관한 탐색적 연구, 국제상학, 19(3), pp.151-171.
  7. 조동성, 이동현(1995), ESRM : 전략이론의 새로운 패러다임, 춘계학술연구발표논문집(제1분과 : 경영일반 및 MIS), 한국경영학회, p.9.
  8. Branch, A.E.(1986), Elements of Port Operation and Management, London, British Ports Federation.
  9. Chou, T. Y. & Liang, G.S.(2001), Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for shipping company performance evaluation, Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830110049951
  10. Cullinane, K. & Toy, N.(2000), Identifying Influential Attributes in Freight Route/Mode Choice Decisions : A Content Analysis, Transportation Research Part E : Logistics and Transportation Review, 36(1), pp.41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(99)00016-2
  11. Ding, J.F., Liang, G. S., Yeh, C.H, and Yeh, Y.C.(2005), "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for the selection of courier service providers: An empirical study from shippers' perspective in Taiwan", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 7(3), pp.250-261. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100135
  12. Harket, P.T.(1987), The theory of ration scale estimation: Satty's analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, .33, pp.1383-1403. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
  13. Lirn, T.C. Thanopoulou, H.A., & Beresford, A.K.(2004), An Application of AHP on Transshipment Port Selcetion : A Global Perspective, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), pp.70-91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093
  14. Murphy, P.R., Dalenberg, D.R. & Daley, J.M.(1992), Port Selection Criteria : An Application of Transportation Research Framework", Transportation Research Part E : Logistics and Transportation Review, 28(3), pp.237-255.
  15. Porter, M.E.(1990), Competitive Advantage of Nations, NY, Free Press.
  16. Porter, M.E.(1991), Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.95-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
  17. Sheu, J.B.(2004), A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 40(1), pp.39-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2003.08.002
  18. Song, D. W. & Yeo, K.T.(2004), A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), pp.34-52. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100096
  19. Willingale, M.C.(1981), "The Port Routing Behavior of Short Sea Ship Operator: Theory and Practice", Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 8, pp.109-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088838100000032
  20. Zadeth, L.A(1965), Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp.338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Cited by

  1. An Analysis of Container Port Efficiency in ASEAN vol.36, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2012.36.7.535
  2. A Study on the Effect of On-Dock System in Container Terminals - Focusing on GwangYang Port - vol.39, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2015.39.1.45
  3. A Study on Relationship between National Policy Support and Recognized Competitiveness of Spatial Information Company vol.22, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12672/ksis.2014.22.3.059
  4. A Study on Stabilizing Container Terminal Market in Busan Port vol.36, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2012.36.10.895
  5. The framework for extracting the strategy of offset company -Toward to assessment based on Desirability function and IPA- vol.16, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.5.3199