• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.41-51
• /
• 2014

A self-administered questionnaire survey and face-to-face interviews were conducted on 150 local residents belonging to seven villages, 160 visitors and 86 experts in order to analyze the attitudes of groups of local residents, visitors as well as experts toward the development plan of Sobaeksan Jarak-gil. Reliability analysis and one-way ANOVA were performed on the data collected by a questionnaire survey using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 after coding. The Duncan Test was conducted as a post-hoc test. Based on the analytical results, in economic terms, the expert group expected an increase in income, improvement in living standards and increase in expenditure for the maintenance of local infrastructure. In environmental terms, the visitor group was highly concerned about the disruption of the local natural environment and ecosystem, destruction of local properties and landscape, increase in water/soil/air pollution and increase in solid waste and noise. In social and cultural terms, the expert group had higher expectation for excavation of traditional cultural properties, instillation of local patriotism and pride, and the visitor group was highly concerned about a rise in crime, destruction of indigenous culture/increase in imitations, and induction of conflicts between residents. It is estimated that these results will be used as basic data for establishing the development plan of the mountainous ecological trail reflecting opinions of various groups.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.105-115
• /
• 2022

This study compares the perspectives of experts and the public on the 2015 revised curriculum. To do this, research papers and newspaper articles were collected from October 2013 to May 2020. During this period, 1152 research papers and 692 newspaper articles were collected, and semantic network analysis was performed. As a result of the study, the educational expert group showed great interest in the core concept of the development of the revised curriculum focused on the abstract concept, while the public focused on the practical problems and consequences of the revision rather than the development of the revised curriculum itself. These results not only show the gap between the perspectives of the educational expert group and the public but also raise the need for effective communication to bridge the gap.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.207-215
• /
• 2006

This study surveys the brand and design recognition by an expert vs. non-expert group in the eye glasses industry. This survey is to search for a way for domestic brands to compete and win foreign ones. The non-expert group chose design as the most noteworthy difference between domestic and foreign brands; likewise, the expert group appeared to first consider design on their choice. Brand recognition by the non-expert group appeared very low; on the other hand, expert group's recognition was higher with domestic brands than with foreign ones. In conclusion, the bounce back of domestic eye glasses business does not seem to be possible in a snap by a special recipe; rather, it is necessary to invest and make efforts to develop new techniques for better quality on the one hand, and to increase brand and design recognition on the other.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2021

Purpose : This study aimed to conduct a translation, backtranslation, and content validity test of the Sensory Processing Measure (SPM) for Korean children. Methods : The translation and content validation process involved direct and backward translation; a test of equivalence between the two versions (the original SPM and the Korean version SPM; K-SPM) was performed using content-related evidence collected by a group of experts and a group of parents. Data analysis was carried out using Excel Content validity indices (CVI), mean, and standard deviation were used for the analysis of content validity. Results : The result of the comparison between the original SPM and K-SPM in the group of experts was 3.54 ± .74, the S-CVI/Avg for semanticity was .92, and the S-CVI/Avg for structure was .86. The results for the mean of the understanding test and the S-CVI/Avg were 3.48 ± .63 and .94, respectively. Conclusion : K-SPM will considerately be used as an assessment to identify sensory processing, praxis, and social participation issues for children in Korea. Further studies are suggested to increase the age range and the sample size for a more comprehensive applicability of the K-SPM to Korean children.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.53-67
• /
• 2005

Present study identified categorization pattern differences between experts and novices and examined whether categorization training has positive effects on problem solving. In experiment I, we examined categorization differences between groups according to expertise using mathematical equation problems. Experts classified problems based on deep structure related to problem solution methods whereas novices classified problems based on surface features. However, in the labeled categorization condition, novices' categorization pattern was not different from experts'. These results suggest that novices have difficulty identifying deep structure of problems. In experiment 2, we examined whether categorization training showing subjects deep structure of problems explicitly increases transfer performance. The results showed that solution training was more effective to expert group whereas categorization training was more effective to novice group. We have discussed that different training methods should be applied according to expertise.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.562-571
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 정보시스템 구축 ${\cdot}$ 운영에 필요한 하드웨어 도입시 용량산정의 객관성을 확보하고 아울러 정보시스템 업무유형 및 규모를 감안한 용량산정 기준을 설정하기 위하여 CPU를 중심으로 메모리와 하드디스크의 용량을 적절히 산출할 수 있는 용량산정식과 용량산정식에 포함될 항목 및 각 항목별 중요도(입력값의 범위)를 실증적으로 도출하였다. 실증분석은 기존연구에서 설정된 용량산정 프레임워크와 하드웨어 용량산정 지침을 바탕으로 설문조사 및 전문가 집단토의 방식을 병행하여 수행하였다. 실증분석 및 전문가집단의 토의결과 CPU(WEB/WAS 및 OLTP), 메모리, 디스크에 대한 용량산정식의 타당도 및 각 용량산정식에 포함될 항목별 입력값의 범위 와 기타 부가적으로 정보시스템의 유형(개발목적과 구축영역)에 따른 항목별 중요도가 각각 도출되었다. 본 연구의 주요의의로는 공공기관의 실무 전문가들을 대상으로 실행적 측면에서 용량산정식의 타당도를 확인하였으며, 항목별 입력값의 경우에도 정형화된 설문서를 통하여 기존 연구들에서 설정된 정보시스템 용량산정식의 객관성을 확보하였다는 점이다. 또한, 주로 공급업체 전문가의 자의적 판단에 따라 설정된 입력값의 범위 등을 공공기관의 현업전문가를 통하여 실증적으로 검증하고 확인하였다는 점이다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.5-19
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to observe and analyze information searching behaviors of various user groups in different access modes for designing user-centered query interface of content-based Music Information Retrieval System(MIRS). Two expert groups and two non-expert groups were recruited for this research. The data gathering techniques employed in this study were in-depth interviewing, participant observation, searching task experiments, think-aloud protocols, and post-search surveys. Expert users, especially majoring in music theory, preferred to input exact notes one by one using the devices such as keyboard and musical score. On the other hand, non-expert users preferred to input melodic contours by humming.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.41 no.3
• /
• pp.373-389
• /
• 2010

Bookmagic is a new reading program that encourages children of 5-15 ages to enjoy reading. Bookmagic provides free downloadable resources such as pre-reading and after-reading activities, booklists, posters and awards. Since a number of reading programs have already been developed, published and used, Bookmagic is not a toally new project. However, it is distinguished by the process of creating the program. While most of the reading programs available in Korea were developed by individual occupations(academic experts, private enterprises, civic organisations, associations of librarians or teachers), Bookmagic was designed by a team of various professionals including a picture book author, an academic researcher, a primary school teacher, a school librarian and two public librarians. Working in a partnership with other professionals, participant librarians had a unique opportunity to develop expertises on reading education as a creator of a program rather than as a deliverer.

• Journal of dental hygiene science
• /
• v.16 no.6
• /
• pp.424-431
• /
• 2016

This study compared the effects of programs according to management type by preparing a manual for oral muscle exercises that integrates oral movement and oral massage. The program was performed on 14 elderly patients in a seniors' college self-practice program group and 28 elderly patients in a social welfare center expert intervention group. In the self-practice group, an expert demonstrated oral muscle exercises and subsequently encouraged self-practice by selecting an oral muscle exercise leader. In the expert intervention group, an expert demonstrated oral exercises on a one-on-one basis and subsequently gave oral muscle massages. In the self-practice group, there was no difference in saliva secretion (p=0.213) or oral dryness (p=0.206), after the intervention, the expert intervention group showed improvements in saliva secretion (p=0.009) and oral dryness (p=0.007). There was no difference in program satisfaction between groups (p=0.143), and both groups reported high satisfaction. As seniors may have difficulty in maintaining oral health behaviors, a certain amount of expert intervention may be needed. The results suggest that both a self-practice oral exercise program and an expert intervention program can be effective elderly patients.

• Food Industry
• /
• s.186
• /
• pp.9-10
• /
• 2005

현재 식품안전기본법제정과 관련하여 정부안을 포합하여 5개 법안이 국회에 상정$\cdot$발의되어 있다.그러나 대부분의 법안들이 식품사고를 사전에 방지하는 식품의 안전성 확보보다는 사후적인 피해구제인 집단소송제나 분쟁조정을 골자로 하고 있다. 이에 우리 협회에서는 지난 4월 8일 식품안전기본법안에 대한 산업계 의견을 마련하여 집단분쟁조정 및 집단소송제 도입의 비현실성 및 문제점을 지적하고, 자칫 잦은 식품분쟁이나 집단소송국가로 전락할 우려가 크기 때문에 강력한 반대의견을 정부와 국회에 정책건의 한 바 있다. 식품안전의 1차적인 책임은 물론 식품업계에 있고 식품안전은 아무리 강조하여도 지나치지 않다. 그러나 식품안전은 소비자에게 피해가 발생하기 전에 사전에 방지할 수 있는 적절한 제도의 도입이 필요한 것이지, 그렇지 않고 이미 사고가 발생한 후에 피해구제를 위한 방안으로 도입되는 집단분쟁조정이나 집단소송제도는 실제적인 소비자보호 효과가 미흡하고, 식품안전과는 거리가 멀다고 생각한다. 따라서 우리 협회에서는 식품안전기본법제정과 관련하여 국회입법을 검토중에 있는 집단분쟁조정과 집단소송제도에 대하여 다음과 같이 전문가의 의견을 들어보고자 한다.