Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.3.105

Comparative Study on the Perspectives of Educational Experts and the Public on the Educational Policy -Using the Semantic Network Analysis and Overlay Mapping-  

Lee, Jin Suk (Sangmyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of Digital Convergence / v.20, no.3, 2022 , pp. 105-115 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study compares the perspectives of experts and the public on the 2015 revised curriculum. To do this, research papers and newspaper articles were collected from October 2013 to May 2020. During this period, 1152 research papers and 692 newspaper articles were collected, and semantic network analysis was performed. As a result of the study, the educational expert group showed great interest in the core concept of the development of the revised curriculum focused on the abstract concept, while the public focused on the practical problems and consequences of the revision rather than the development of the revised curriculum itself. These results not only show the gap between the perspectives of the educational expert group and the public but also raise the need for effective communication to bridge the gap.
Keywords
Educational Policy; 2015 Reform Curriculum; Expert Group; Public; Sementic Network; Overlay Map;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kang, H. S., & Lee, Y. B. (2015). Analysis of the Press Report of the 2015 Revised National Curriculum and Exploration of the Suggestion for Future Revision. Secondary Education Research, 63(4), 435-464. DOI : 10.25152/ser.2015.63.4.435   DOI
2 Yu, Y., & Baek, S. G. (2016). Issue Analysis of the Related Mass Media's News Articles on the 2015 Revised National Curriculum Using Automated Text Analysis. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(3), 127-156. UCI : G704-001275.2016.19.3.003   DOI
3 Lewicki, R. J., Gray, B., & Elliott, M. (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Island Press, Washington D. C. USA.
4 Dietz, Thomas, R. Scott Frey, and Eugene, A. Rosa. (2002). "Risk, Technology, and Society." In Riley E. Dunlap & William Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Sociology (pp. 329-369). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
5 Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959-970. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x   DOI
6 Fischhoff, B. (1990). Psychology and public policy: Tool or tool maker?. American Psychologist, 45, 57-63. DOI: 10.1037/h0091626   DOI
7 Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atmans, C. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8 Waltman, L., N. J. Van Eck, N., & Noyons, C. M. (2010). "A Unified Approach to Mapping and Clustering of Bibliometric Networks," Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002   DOI
9 Rafols, I., Porter, A. L. & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science Overlay Maps : A New Tool for Research Polocy and Livrary Management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871-1887. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21368   DOI
10 Bak, H. J. (2013). An Analysis of Differences in Perceptions of BSE between Experts and Lay People. The Journal of Rural Society, 23(2), 301-341. UCI : G704-000099.2013.23.2.002
11 Carley, S., Porter, A. L., Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Visualization of disciplinary profiles: Enhanced science overlay maps. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(3), 68-111.   DOI
12 Han, B., Kim, H., & Kim, Y. (2020). An In-depth Interview Study of Risk Perception, Psychological Distance and Public Behaviors on Climate Change : Focusing on the Comparison between People at Large and Experts. Korean Journal of Communication & Information 101, 465-505. DOI : 10.46407/kjci.2020.06.101.465   DOI
13 So, K. H., Hu, Y. J., Park, J., & Chang, Y. W. (2019). A Meta-analysis of International Trends in Curriculum Studies: Based on the Papers Presented in AERA since 2010. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 117-142.   DOI
14 Kim, S. Y., & Kang, S. W. (2015). 2015 "Integrated Curriculum between Humanities and Sciences and Engineering Tracks" in Korea: on the Based Media News reports. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 25(2), 91-112. UCI : G704-SER000004221.2015.25.2.002
15 Wynne, B. (1995). "Public understanding of science." Handbook of science and technology studies, 1, 361-388.
16 Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of risk. London, UK: Earthscan.
17 Kim, D. H. (2017). The Limits of Governance System for Development of 2015 National Curriculum. The Korean Society for Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 95-118.
18 Kang, J. Y., & So, K. H. (2016). Media Discourse Analysis of Korean Newspaper Articles on the 2015 Revised Curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(3), 1-27. UCI : G704-000671.2016.34.3.005
19 Oh, C. J., Shin, H. K., & Kim, E. K. (2015). A Review of Research trends in Special Education Curriculum. Journal of Special Education, 16(4), 337-362. DOI : 10.19049.JSPED.2015.16.4.14   DOI
20 Lee, J. S. (2020). A Study on the Research Trends of Convergence Education in Elementary and Secondary Education -Using Semantic Network Analysis and Overlay Map-. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 58(2), 25-50.
21 Hong, S. T. (2015). The Collapse of Sampoong Department Store and Corruption-Accident Society. Economy and Society, 108, 231-253. DOI : 10.18207/criso.2015..108.231   DOI
22 Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3   DOI
23 Park, S. Y., Lee, J. R., & Kang, H. S. (2015). An Analysis of Professional Recognition on 2015 Curriculum Revision. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 27(4), 1172-1183. UCI : G704-001373.2015.27.4.002   DOI
24 Park, H. K. (2016). Analysis of Problems Related to the Process of Subject Curriculum Development. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(3), 185-208. UCI : G704-000671.2016.34.3.010
25 Park, M. J., & Sung, Y. K. (2011). Trends of curriculum research: Research areas and methods analysis. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(4), 25-50. DOI : 10.15708/kscs.29.4.201112.002   DOI
26 Jang, S. M., & Han, D. S. (2017). Meta-Synthesis of National Curriculum Studies: Focusing on Practical Implications for Policy. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 325-353.
27 Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (2002). Dimensions of social welfare policy. Allyn & Bacon.