Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18064/JKASI.2021.19.3.22

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation Study on a Korean of Sensory Processing Measure Home Form  

Lee, Hye-Rim (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Daegu University)
Yoo, Eun-Jung (Dept. of Special Education, College of Social Sciences, Inje University)
Kim, Kyeong-Mi (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Medical Affairs, Inje University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration / v.19, no.3, 2021 , pp. 22-31 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : This study aimed to conduct a translation, backtranslation, and content validity test of the Sensory Processing Measure (SPM) for Korean children. Methods : The translation and content validation process involved direct and backward translation; a test of equivalence between the two versions (the original SPM and the Korean version SPM; K-SPM) was performed using content-related evidence collected by a group of experts and a group of parents. Data analysis was carried out using Excel Content validity indices (CVI), mean, and standard deviation were used for the analysis of content validity. Results : The result of the comparison between the original SPM and K-SPM in the group of experts was 3.54 ± .74, the S-CVI/Avg for semanticity was .92, and the S-CVI/Avg for structure was .86. The results for the mean of the understanding test and the S-CVI/Avg were 3.48 ± .63 and .94, respectively. Conclusion : K-SPM will considerately be used as an assessment to identify sensory processing, praxis, and social participation issues for children in Korea. Further studies are suggested to increase the age range and the sample size for a more comprehensive applicability of the K-SPM to Korean children.
Keywords
Back translation; Content validity; Korean version Sensory Processing Measure(SPM);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kristjansson, E. A., Desrochers, A., & Zumbo, B. (2003). Designer's corner-translating and adapting measurement instruments for cross- linguistic and cross-cultural research: A guide for practitioners. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 35(2), 127-142.
2 Parham, L. D., & Ecker, C. (2002). Evaluation of sensory processing: Research version 4. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane, & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 194-196). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.
3 Ahn, R. R., Miller, L. J., Miberger, S., & McIntosh, D. N. (2004). Prevalence of parents' perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 287-302. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.3.287   DOI
4 Ayres, A. J. (2005). Sensory integration and the child (25th Anniversary ed). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
5 Shin, M. J. (2012). Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the School Function Assessment. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Yonsei, Seoul.
6 Baranek, G. T., Chjn, Y. H., Hess, L. M., Yankee, J. G., Hatton, D. D., & Hooper, S. R. (2002). Sensory processing correlates of occupational performance in children with Fragile X syndrome: Preliminary findings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 538-546. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.5.538   DOI
7 Beck, C. T., Bernal, H., & Froman, R, D. (2003). Methods to document semantic equivalence of a translated scale. Research Nursing Health, 26(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10066   DOI
8 Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4   DOI
9 Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x   DOI
10 Su, C. T., & Parham, L. D. (2002). Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross- cultural use. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 581-585. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.5.581   DOI
11 Park, K. Y., Yoo, E. Y., Jung, M. Y., Park, S. H., Lee, J. S., & Park, S. Y. (2011). Validation of the sensory profile for Korean children with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 19(3), 1-12.
12 Poon, M. Y. C. (1999). Validation of miller assessment for preschoolers (Cantonese version). Unpublished master's thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR.
13 Choi, J. H. (2010). Study on validity of the Korean Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency, second edition(BOT-2). Unpublished master's thesis, University of Inje, Kimhae.
14 Bullinger, M., Anderson, R., Cella, D., & Aaronson, N. (1993). Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Quality of Life Research, 2, 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422219   DOI
15 Hong, E. K. (2014). The study on validity and reliability of the Miller assessment for preschoolers (K-MAP). Doctor dissertation, Inje University, Kimhae.
16 Hong, E. K., & Kim, K. M. (2012). Systematic review on translation and culture adaptation study method of developmental assessment tool. Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 16(3), 319-338.
17 Jin, H. S. (2005). Reliability of the peabody developmental gross motor scales-2 in infants with motor developmental disability. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Dankook, Seoul.
18 Lim, E. Y. (1998). Relative of effectiveness back translation procedure in cross-cultural adaptation of attitude measure. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Ewha Womans, Seoul.
19 Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017   DOI
20 Parham, L. D., Ecker, C., Miller Kuhaneck, H., Henry, D. A., Glennon, T. J., & Mu, K. (2007). Sensory processing measure: Manual. Los Angeles; Western Psychological Services.
21 Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199   DOI