• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.13 no.7
• /
• pp.239-246
• /
• 2008

The supplier selection has a direct effect on the organization's efficiency, effectiveness and competitiveness, so the right supplier selection is the most important decision of a company. In order to select the best suppliers, both qualitative and quantitative factors should be considered. To decide which suppliers are the best and how much should be purchased from each selected supplier, many models which considered a single objective and multiple objectives have been proposed. But they have problems in considering qualitative factors which are very important in supplier selection. So in this article an integration model of an analytical hierarchy process and linear programming is proposed to consider both qualitative and quantitative factors in choosing the best suppliers and placing the optimum order quantities among them. This integrated model can be applied effectively and easily any organization and management circumstances.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2011.01a
• /
• pp.203-206
• /
• 2011

공개 경쟁에 의한 제안 업체 선정과 객관적이고 공정한 제안서의 평가는 공공IT 부문에 있어서 성공적인 사업 수행을 위한 필수요소이다. '소프트웨어 기술성 평가기준 적용 가이드'에서는 소프트웨어 기술성 평가기준을 적용하는데 필요한 절차와 단계별 적용방법 및 세부내용 해설과 평가척도 예시를 제시하여 활용이 가능하도록 하였다. 그러나 기술성을 평가하기 위한 평가부문별 평가항목 및 평가기준에 대한 부분이 구체적이지 않아 경쟁력 있는 제안 업체의 기술성을 정확하고 공정하게 평가하는데 어려움이 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 제안 업체의 기술성을 정확하게 평가하기 위하여 평가요소 중에서 기술 평가요소에 대한 부분을 평가지표로 선정하고 통계 기법으로 평가지표를 검증하는 방법을 제시하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.169-177
• /
• 2007

Competitive international business environment has forced many firms to focus on supply chain management to cope with highly increasing competition. Hence the supplier selection is the most important decision of a company. Because it has a direct effect on cost reduction and quality, profitability and flexibility improvement of a company, so the right supplier selection significantly affect on the organization's efficiency and effectiveness and competitiveness. The primary research objects of this study is to evaluate an importance of supplier selection factors as an index and to present the evaluation model for supplier selection. For this purpose, this study adopts the AHP method to calculate the importance of supplier selection factors. In this study, 16 factors which affect on the supplier selection decision making are classified into three factors-product supply related factor, product related factor, management ability related factor.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
• /
• 2003.11a
• /
• pp.369-392
• /
• 2003

최근 물류환경의 변화로 제품의 신속한 수송과 고객 지향적 물류서비스 제공의 극대화를 꾀하려는 기업들은 제3자 물류의 활용에 커다란 관심을 가지게 되었다. 기업이 제3자 물류업체 활용을 통한 성과를 높이기 위해서는 고객서비스의 향상, 물류관련 비용의 절감 및 물류활동에 대한 운영효율의 향상을 수행할 수 있는 물류업체를 선정하는 것이 중요하다 할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 제3자 물류업체 선정과 관련한 주요 선행연구의 종합적인 고찰을 통하여, 제3자 물류업체 선정에 대한 평가기준들을 도출하였다. 선정을 위한 기준으로 비용, 물류서비스, 업체평가, 정보시스템의 4가지 항목으로 나누었고, 이를 계층화하여 AHP기법을 통하여 분석하였다. 그 결과 상위기준의 상대적 중요도는 물류서비스가 0.425로 가장 높게 나타났고, 비용(0.232), 정보시스템(0.224), 업체평가(0.120) 순으로 나타났다. 비용의 항목에 포함되어 있는 하위기준의 중요도는 경제성이 0.710, 안정성이 0.290으로 나타났다. 물류서비스 항목에 포함되어 있는 하위기준의 중요도는 신뢰성이 0.780, 유연성이 0.220로 나타났다. 업체평가 항목에 포함되어 있는 하위기준의 중요도는 기업역량이 0.507, 관계지향성이 0.493로 나타났다. 정보시스템 항목에 포함되어있는 하위기준의 중요도는 정보인프라가 0.471, 정보활용도는 0.529로 나타났다. 분석에 있어 추가적으로 학계와 실무계 전문가 집단으로 나누어 그 중요도를 산출하였는데, 학계 전문가 집단과 실무계 전문가 집단 모두 상위기준에 있어 물류서비스가 가장 높게 나타났다. 주목할만한 점은 학계 전문가 집단의 경우 정보시스템이 비용보다 더 높게 나타난 반면에, 실무계 전문가 집단은 비용이 정보시스템 보다 더 높게 나타났다는 것이다.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.261-272
• /
• 2008

The primary research objects of this study is to evaluate an importance of supplier selection factors as an index according the level of product standardization and to present the evaluation model for supplier selection. For this purpose, this study adopts the AHP method to calculate the importance of supplier selection factors. In this study 16 factors which affect on the supplier selection decision making are classified into three factors-product supply related factor, product related factor, management ability related factor. Results also indicate that standardized products are much more dealt by means of on-line compare to customized products. It means the buyer opportunities is potentially an increase in the amount of current supplier re-evaluation, which may lead to new suppliers being considered more often.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.18 no.12
• /
• pp.291-298
• /
• 2018

Supplier selection for energy production facility is a multi-criteria decision-making problem and is of strategic importance for cost efficiency of synthetic fiber production company. The purpose of this paper is to present an approach to select best energy production facility for a synthetic fiber production company. Toward this, we derived criteria to evaluate the energy production facility and develop an Analytic Network Process model to help decision makers set priorities on multiple criteria while considering both qualitative and quantitative aspects of the problem. The application of the proposed approach indicates that it can be successfully applied to facilitate the decision making process for selecting the best supplier of the energy production facility.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.215-225
• /
• 2020

In selecting a company of A-E service provider for a public construction project, public owners make widely use the evaluation method based on the quantitative criteria to emphasize transparency and fairness instead of putting more weighting on bidders' technical capability. The selection method and process to select technically better company has been in discussion to motivate company to build up their technical capability and better quality of service. This paper examined US laws and regulations related to evaluating and selecting an A-E company for public construction project in terms of principles, process, selection committee, evaluation methods, and contract management and so on. Then deduced several implications for domestic public owner to select the most adequate company for a certain architectural service through fair and efficient way. The major findings are technical capability based selection, emphasizing owner's role and responsibility, consideration of small and mid-sized company, debriefing, and post-service evaluation.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.279-284
• /
• 2001

The owner's evaluation system about the contractor's work performance is used to give the contractor some advantages or disadvantages. According to the result of evaluation of the contractor's performance in the given construction project, the owner identify the good contractors and give them some merits in the future project bidding. However, the system used in the Korean construction industry has caused many problems and has been operated improperly. As a case study, this paper investigates the current problems existed in the KNHC (Korean National Housing Corporation) evaluation system and suggests some directions for its efficient operation. In doing so, the study performed interviews with the KNHC officers and the related contractors, using a structured questionnaire

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.23 no.5
• /
• pp.961-970
• /
• 2012

To evaluate companies that participated in the defense R&D project, 27 variables are chosen through literature survey, feature analysis of defense R&D and interviews with military experts. 17 variables are selected after factor analysis which is applied to reduce the number of variables and to detect structure in the relationships among variables, that is to classify variables using Likert-type scales. And then 17 variables are prioritized by AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method. It is shown that communication skill & cooperation strategy, level of technology, possession of needs technology have high priorities. However, protection plan of technology leakage, expertise of subcontractors, software development plan have low priorities.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.99-112
• /
• 2014

This paper addresses an assessment model for selecting PL(Private Level) product companies. The proposed model extracts the weights of evaluation elements based on AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). These evaluation elements are from real-world instances in a domestic hyper market. Especially, the model points at food products which constitute a large portion of entire profits in the market. In this model, we first classify the 54 evaluation elements into 4 layers and secondly carry out a survey with relevant specialists based on them. We also estimate the weights of evaluation elements according to pairwise comparisons from the survey, and propose them as a quantitative alternative which can be applied in real-world problems. Finally, the pilot-study is conducted to compare the proposed model with the existing simple summation method. From this study, HACCP system assessment and Review(0.279281), Transportation(0.117706) and Fundamental law observance(0.066392) are presented as the key evaluation elements for selecting PL product companies. The proposed model facilitates the company selection among those candidate companies which is not easy to determine the superiority by reflecting the importance of evaluation elements.