• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety Conference
• /
• 1998.06a
• /
• pp.14-21
• /
• 1998

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety Conference
• /
• 1998.06a
• /
• pp.22-26
• /
• 1998

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety Conference
• /
• 1998.06a
• /
• pp.27-38
• /
• 1998

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety Conference
• /
• 1998.06a
• /
• pp.41-62
• /
• 1998

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety Conference
• /
• 1998.06a
• /
• pp.81-83
• /
• 1998

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2022.06a
• /
• pp.24-25
• /
• 2022

Based on the case of Busan Port November anchorage, which is a group anchorage, related regulations to promote group anchorage safety management, the turning radius of anchored ship, and more accurate weather information collection and safety through improvement of the supporting system for VTS operations to apply the anchorage location in accordance with reality that it is a suggestion for management improvement methods.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.81-120
• /
• 2018

To promote the aviation safety reporting system that is operated to enhance aviation safety and to utilize related information, it should first be preceded by standards for non-punishment and data protection. It is because the purpose of collection and analysis of aviation safety related data through the aviation safety reporting system is to prevent recurrence of accidents by investigating their causes through collection and analysis of diverse types of information related to aviation safety. Both mandatory and voluntary reporting systems are in operation for aviation safety under the current Aviation Safety Act. It is said that they were introduced to survey causes for accidents and to prevent recurrences. In fact, however, it is hard to expect active implementation of the reporting system for aviation safety unless the reporters are firstly exempted from punishment. Therefore, the system should be improved so that it can satisfy its purpose and the purposes of data collection concerning aviation safety through examination of the purposes of the reporting system. One of the matters that needs to be considered to promote the reporting system should be the scope of aviation safety hindrances presupposed under the current institution. The voluntary aviation safety reporting system differs from the systems of ICAO or the key advanced countries, including the USA and the UK as it limits the target accidents subject to reporting to minor aviation safety hindrances only. That being said, improvements should be made by requiring mandatory reporting of aviation safety hindrances based on their severity while recognizing a greater variety of aviation safety concerns like international standards. Safety actions and sharing of information based on collection and analysis of diverse data related to aviation safety will greatly contribute to enhance aviation safety as the purposes of the reporting system are to explore causes for accidents and to prevent their recurrences. What is most important in this regard is strict data protection and non-punishment principles; compliance with them should be secured. We can hardly expect the successful operation of the system unless the reporter is exempted from punishment and the relevant data is protected as promotion of voluntary reporting is an essential factor for enhancing the safety culture. Otherwise, the current system may induce hiding of relevant facts or data to evade punishment. It is true that the regulation for enhancing safety tends to have limitations or blind spots; nevertheless, it should still be enforced strictly and completely. Technological progresses and mistakes of operators appear in different forms based on individual cases. The consequential damages may amount to a truly severe level. Therefore, we have studied and suggested to the methods of activiation and amendments on the aviation safety reporting system, which is referred for one of the proactive safety management systems. The proposed improvement of the reporting system and introduction of non-punishment for collection of aviation safety data for deploying a preemptive prevention system would serve as the backbone for enhancing aviation safety in Korea.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.34 no.4
• /
• pp.354-372
• /
• 2016

This study identified factors affecting the crash severity at freeway work zones. A nice feature of this study was to take into account the characteristics of work zone traffic management in analyzing traffic safety concerns. In addition to crash records, vehicle detection systems (VDS) data and work zone historical data were used for establishing a dataset to be used for statistical analyses based on an ordered probit model. A total of six safety improvement strategies for freeway work zones, including traffic merging method, guidance information provision, speed management, warning information systems, traffic safety facility, and monitoring of effectiveness for countermeasures, were also proposed.

• Magazine of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.42-50
• /
• 2007

데이터에 입각한 과학적 안전관리시스템(Safety Management System, SMS)의 도입은 사후적 차원에 머물던 그간의 안전관리활동의 한계를 극복하고, 예방적 안전관리를 통하여 국가 항공안전증진에 획기적으로 기여할 것으로 기대된다. 이번 기고에서는 항공교통분야에 있어서 안전관리시스템(SMS)의 도입 현황과 함께 SMS의 핵심요소인 위험관리에 있어서, 평가된 위험이 시스템에서 정상적으로 관리되고 있는지 확인할 수 있는 안전평가(Safery Assessment) 개념에 대하여 국제민간항공기기(ICAO)에서 제시하는 개념들을 소개한다.

• The Safety technology
• /
• no.189
• /
• pp.14-15
• /
• 2013

7만 과천시민의 편익과 복리증진을 위해 체육 문화시설 등을 관리 운영하고 있는 '과천시설관리공단'은 지방 공기업의 모범이자 표상(表象)으로 유명하다. 이곳이 전국적으로 주목을 받는 가장 큰 이유는 '시민과 임직원의 안전'을 경영방침의 최우선으로 내세우고, 빈틈없는 안전관리를 펼쳐 왔기 때문이다. 이런 안전경영의 중심에는 이성재 이사장이 있다. 이 이사장은 2006년 취임 당시부터 고객 및 직원의 행복과 안전을 먼저 생각하는 '서번트 리더십'을 강력히 추진해왔다. 그 결과 안전보건에 대한 높은 공적을 인정받아 올해 산업안전보건강조주간 기념식에서 영예의 대통령표창을 수상했다. 안전경영으로 행복도시 과천을 만들어가고 있는 이성재 이사장을 만나 그만의 신념 등을 들어봤다.