Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of Factors Affecting the Crash Severity and Safety Countermeasures Toward Safer Work Zone Traffic Management

공사구간 교통관리특성을 고려한 고속도로 교통사고 심각도 영향요인 분석 및 안전성 증진 방안

  • YOON, Seok Min (Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • OH, Cheol (Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • PARK, Hyun Jin (Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • CHUNG, Bong Jo (Transportation Research Division, Korea Expressway Corporation)
  • 윤석민 (한양대학교 교통.물류공학과) ;
  • 오철 (한양대학교 교통.물류공학과) ;
  • 박현진 (한양대학교 교통.물류공학과) ;
  • 정봉조 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원)
  • Received : 2016.03.21
  • Accepted : 2016.08.11
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study identified factors affecting the crash severity at freeway work zones. A nice feature of this study was to take into account the characteristics of work zone traffic management in analyzing traffic safety concerns. In addition to crash records, vehicle detection systems (VDS) data and work zone historical data were used for establishing a dataset to be used for statistical analyses based on an ordered probit model. A total of six safety improvement strategies for freeway work zones, including traffic merging method, guidance information provision, speed management, warning information systems, traffic safety facility, and monitoring of effectiveness for countermeasures, were also proposed.

공사구간에서는 교통류의 안전한 합류 및 통과를 위해 속도관리와 차로차단을 통한 체계적인 교통관리가 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 공사구간 교통관리특성을 교통안전분석에 반영하기 위해서 사고자료, 차량검기지에서 추출된 속도 및 교통자료, 공사 시 종점, 페쇄 차로 등의 정보가 포함된 공사장 이력자료를 활용하였다. 2010년부터 2014년까지 발생한 고속도로 공사구간 사고자료 중 총 231건의 사고에 대해 교통상황자료 및 공사장 이력자료를 매칭시킨 분석 대상 자료셋을 구축하고, 순서형 프로빗 모형을 적용하여 사고 심각도 영향 요인을 도출하였다. 분석결과, 속도, 차로 폐쇄에 따른 용량 감소량, 주의구간 내 사고 위치, 공사 작업 유형의 변수들이 공사구간 사고 심각도에 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 분석결과를 바탕으로 6가지 공사구간 안전성 증진 방안을 수립하였다. 안전성 증진방안으로는 차로 합류 및 차단 방안, 주의구간 내 정보 제공 방안, 공사구간 속도 관리 방안, 공사구간 경고 정보 제공 방안, 공사구간 교통안전시설 도입, 공사구간 안전성 효과분석 및 모니터링 방안을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Banaeiyan N. A., Zaman A. U., Hayee M. I. (2016), Visual Warning System for Workers' Safety on Roadside Work Zones, In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, 16-1227.
  2. Bonneson J. A,. McCoy P. T. (1993), Estimation of Safety at Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections On Rural Highways, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1401, 83-89.
  3. Brewer K. A. (1972), Safety Evaluation of Forced Weaving as a Traffic Control Measure in Freeway Maintenance Operations, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 390, 84-93.
  4. Brown H., Sun C., Cope T. (2015), Evaluation of Mobile Work Zone Alarm Systems, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2485, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.3141/2485-06
  5. Bryden J., Andrew L. (1999), Serious and Fatal Injuries to Workers on Highway Construction Projects, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1657, 42-47. https://doi.org/10.3141/1657-06
  6. Choi S. (2013), Effects of Weather and Traffic Conditions on Accident Severity on Freeway, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 33(3), 1105-1113. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.1105
  7. Daniel J., Dixon K., Jared D. (2000), Analysis of Fatal Crashes in Georgia Work Zones, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1715, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.3141/1715-03
  8. FHWA (2004), Intelligent Transportation System in Work Zones: A Case Study.
  9. FHWA (2013), Guidance for the Use of Portable Changeable Message Signs in Work Zones.
  10. Gerald U., Vichika I., Robert B. (2016), Safety Effects of Portable End-of-Queue Warning System Deployments at Texas Work Zones, In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, 16-3587.
  11. Hong J. Y., Kim K. T., Lee S. B. (2010), Developing the Accident Injury Severity on a Field of Construction Work Using Ordered Probit Model, Journal of the KOSOS, 26(2), 89-98.
  12. Idewu W., Wolshon B. (2010), Joint Merge and its Impact on Merging Speeds in Lane Reduction Areas of Construction Zone, Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2169, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.3141/2169-04
  13. Jang J. H. (2013), A Study of Traffic Accident Characteristic in Freeway Work Zone in Korea, Chonnam National University.
  14. Khattak A. J., Khattak A. J., Council F. M. (2002), Effects of Work Zone Presence on Injury and Non-injury Crashes, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00099-3
  15. Korea Expressway Corporation (2015), Korea Expressway Work Zone Traffic Accident Condition.
  16. Korea National Police Agency (2013), Installation and Manual for Traffic Sign
  17. Lee S. Y., Min S. H., Park J. Y., Yoon S. D. (2005), An application of Logit & Probit model, PARKYOUNGSA, 177-203.
  18. Maddala G. S. (1983), Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables In Economics, New York: Cambridge University Press, 257-91.
  19. Meng Q., Weng J., Qu X. (2010), A Probabilistic Quantitative Risk Assessment Model for the Long-term Work Zone Crashes, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6), 1866-1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.007
  20. Analysis, Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, 15-4130.
  21. Pappe R. (2014), Speed Reduction Measures/TCD, Traffic-Roadway Section, Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem.
  22. Park M. C., Lee J. H., Park T. H., Ha T. J. (2008), A Study of Traffic Accident Characteristics in Freeway Construction Zones, The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, 7(1), 127-136.
  23. Qi Y., Srinivasan R., Teng H., Baker R. (2013), Analysis of the Frequency and Severity of Rear-end Crashes in Work Zones, Traffic injury prevention, 14(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2012.675109
  24. Savolainen P. T., Reddy V., Santos P. E., Joseph B., Datta T. K. (2009), Evaluation of Temporary Removable Rumble Strips for Speed Reduction, In Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, 09-1970.
  25. Schrock S. D., See C. F., Becke M. T., Mulinazzi T. E., Initiative S. W. Z. D. (2008), Evaluation of Early Merge Static Work Zone Signing in Oklahoma.
  26. Sun C., Edaram P., Ervin K. (2011), Elevated-risk Work Zone Evaluation of Temporary Rumble Strips, Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 3(3), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2011.594934
  27. Washington S. P., Karlaftis M. G., Mannering F. (2010), Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  28. Wong J. M., Arico M. C., Ravani B. (2011), Factors Influencing Injury Severity to Highway Workers in Work Zone Intrusion Accidents, Traffic Injury Prevention, 12(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2010.525569

Cited by

  1. 의사결정나무를 이용한 고속도로 공사구간 사고 심각도에 관한 연구 vol.34, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2016.34.6.535
  2. 순서형 프로빗 모형을 이용한 버스 운송사업 유형 별 사고심각도 영향요인 분석 vol.36, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2018.36.1.013