• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.533-551
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to investigate how middle school mathematics teachers understand the definition and the purpose of constructed-response assessments as well as what they expect from the assessments. By examining the responses of 189 middle school mathematics teachers to the survey, we found that there is discrepancy between their perceptions and reality of the constructed-response assessments in practice. In other words, teachers' practice is not well aligned with their perceptions and expectations due to the restraint of school system and environment. The findings give us some meaningful implication for the improvement of effective constructed-response assessments and professional development.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.63-95
• /
• 2012

Since performance assessment was implemented for 10 years, a survey has been carried out from 212 elementary school teachers in Seoul area in terms of their perception and status about descriptive assessment. As results, most of teachers agreed strongly that using constructed-response items is necessary for assessment, and they showed that purpose of using constructed-response items in their mathematics classrooms was to evaluate accurately student achievement in accordance with learning objectives in mathematics and they referred mainly to items which they modified from problems or items in the textbook when they generate constructed-response items. In addition, they considered level of difficulty in creating constructed-response items mostly. Moreover, they indicated that the effects of assessment through constructed-response items would be improvement of students' problem solving and reasoning skills.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.401-422
• /
• 2008

In the current school curriculum, an alternative assessment method which focuses more on the problem solving process rather than the final solution is being investigated. The goal is to evaluate students' understanding of the subject. A descriptive evaluation is being suggested as a way of examining the thought process of the students by a structured analysis of the problem solving process. But currently, there are not enough descriptive problems available for teachers to effectively carry out the alternative assessment method in the elementary school mathematics curriculum. In this research, we surveyed 197 elementary school teachers in Seoul to determine the status of descriptive evaluation in elementary school mathematics and to understand the teachers perception about the new assessment method. The goal of the survey was to find an effective implication of the new assessment method in elementary mathematics classes. The research showed that the elementary teachers use this assessment method about 4 to 7 times per month in their classes. They give descriptive problem test anytime they think it is appropriate during the Instruction of the topic. More than 90% of the teachers were using this assessment method to improve students' creativity and mathematical thinking. The teachers in the survey also commented that the teachers' administrative responsibility should be reduced and that the school environment in general should be improved for the new assessment method to be successful. Finally the study also showed that development of more descriptive problems in each grade level is needed to progress the new assessment method.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.38 no.3
• /
• pp.425-441
• /
• 2024

This study analyzed the description of the definitions of terms used in the high school <Mathematics> textbooks of the 2015 revised curriculum, selected controversial terms, and investigated the perceptions of mathematics teachers and professors on them. The four controversial terms selected were 'absolute inequality', 'asymptotes', 'irrational expressions', and 'irrational functions'. A survey was conducted to evaluate whether the definitions of these terms differed between textbooks, whether they needed improvement, and whether they needed to be designated as terms. The results of the study showed that 'absolute inequality' was recognized as having a large difference in the definitions of the textbooks, and that there was a high need for revision of the definitions of the terms. In addition, the need for additional research was raised on 'asymptotes' and 'irrational expressions'. This study can be used as basic data for standardizing and improving the definitions of textbook terms to improve students' conceptual understanding.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.131-154
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of essay writing-centered mathematics instruction on problem solving and mathematical deposition in the elementary school. For the present study, two 6th grade classes with equivalent achievement in terms of problem solving and mathematical disposition based on the pretest. A total of 15 mathematics lessons focused on writing activities were administered to the experiment group for two months, while the textbook-based traditional lessons were given to the comparison group. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were adopted to analyze the data. The results of the present study showed that essay writing-centered mathematics teaching is statistically superior that the textbook-based mathematics teaching with respect to students' problem solving and mathematical disposition. In addition, it was evidenced that essay writing-centered mathematics instruction makes an influence on students' perceptions toward essay-based assessment in a positive way.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Quality Management Conference
• /
• 2009.10a
• /
• pp.57-63
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 제조 부문과 서비스 부문 간의 서로 다른 6시그마 프로젝트에 대해 분석하였으며 각 부문 별 8편씩 실제 프로젝트 사례를 바탕으로 서술하였다. 서술 단계는 6시그마 기법 중 DMAIC 방법을 기본으로 하였으며 최근 6시그마를 도입하고 있는 서비스 부문에 대해 제조 부문과의 차이점을 분석하여 향후 서비스 부문이 6시그마 도입하는 과정에서 문제점과 나아갈 방향을 제시하고자 한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.234-240
• /
• 2004

The main purpose of this study was to examine the effects of interpretive style reading materials on high school students philosophical viewpoints on science. Subjects for this study were 137 girl students in four classes of a high school located in Daejeon city. The classes were divided into two groups: experimental groups and control groups. Students in the experimental groups were administered a series of the reading materials over thirty-six sessions. Additionally, PPP(Philosophical Perspectives Prove) was used in order to assess students philosophical viewpoints on science. Results of the study showed that the interpretive style reading materials takes effect on the change of students philosophical viewpoints on science. At the initial stage, a number of students exhibited viewpoints inclined toward inductivism. As time goes by, however, viewpoint of inductivism was decreased and view of falcificationism and view of relativism were increased. The results also indicated that the effect of intervention was stable.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.31 no.6
• /
• pp.1009-1024
• /
• 2011

Previous studies showed that many secondary school students and teachers have difficulties in distinguishing the phenomena of dissolution and diffusion, as well as the phenomena of diffusion and effusion. In this study, currently accepted term definitions of dissolution, diffusion and effusion were searched from the IUPAC Gold Book and the physical chemistry textbooks, and the points to differentiate the definitions were sought. Also, the term definitions of these three phenomena in the secondary school text books and the college general chemistry textbooks were surveyed and compared to the currently accepted definitions. It was found that dissolution is formation of one new phase from mixing two phases, while diffusion is the migration of matter down from the concentration gradient. The "concentration gradient" is considered to be a key point to distinguish diffusion from the dissolution. However, the concentration gradient was not mentioned in the definitions of diffusion in most of the secondary school textbooks and the college general chemistry textbooks. Effusion is differentiated from diffusion by the gas molecules escaping from the container through a tiny hole without collision. The definition of effusion was not found in most of the secondary school textbooks.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.377-397
• /
• 2008

In today's secondary school mathematics curriculum, assessment is to be focused on evaluating the student's mathematical thinking rather than finding the correct solution to the problem. A descriptive evaluation method is therefore introduced to the school districts and suggested as an alternative assessment method in K-12 school mathematics. Descriptive evaluation method is widely available for use in schools, but there are barriers to using it since the teachers are forced to use the method by the school districts. In this research, we surveyed 120 secondary school mathematics teachers in Seoul and the surrounding metropolitan area to understand the status and the perception about using descriptive evaluation. The goal of the study was to find and understand the direct implications of using the new assessment method in secondary mathematics classes. The study showed that most of the mathematics teachers used the descriptive assessment method during their regular exam periods which is given twice per semester. Most of the open-ended problems used for descriptive evaluation were medium or high level math questions which were graded by the teachers at least 3 times to ensure objective evaluation. The teachers stated that objectivity in grading, administrative situation, and development of descriptive problems were the difficult barriers in descriptive evaluation. The teachers in the survey also commented that teachers' administrative responsibility should be reduced and that school environment in general should be improved for the new assessment method to become successful. Finally, the study showed that development of more descriptive problems with specific grading guidelines need to be developed for each grade level.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.275-290
• /
• 2014

This study aims to examine how secondary mathematics teachers perceive and how they use constructed-response assessment in their mathematics classrooms. For this purpose, we conducted a survey in Seoul, Inchun, and Gyeonggi-do; 189 teachers participated in the survey. Results from the data analysis suggest as follows: a) the secondary mathematics teachers participated in the survey seem to consider the primary goals of assessment through constructed-response items as evaluating student achievement and the development of students' thinking and creativity; b) the teachers perceive that constructed-response assessment would promote students' mathematical thinking and problem solving skills; c) in general, constructed-response items were included in both performance assessment(less than 20 percent) and paper-and-pencil test(20 to 40 percent); and d) constructed-response items were primarily used as a part of regular examination, rather than as an independent assessment.