• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.24 no.5
• /
• pp.127-152
• /
• 2014

Supplemental Educational Services (SES) are government initiated tutoring services to strengthen basic skills of academically underachieving students and thus close achievement gaps among students. Recently, however, the direction of SES has shifted its gear away from the test-driven accountability system in the United States (US) and Korea. Based on related literature, official documents, and statistics data, this study investigates major aspects of SES in the US and Korea, suggesting implications for future SES in the two countries. Major findings illustrate; 1) SES both in the US and Korea aim to serve students with underachievement yet place a primary emphasis on academics, 2) the US and Korea show contrasting results of SES in students' academic achievement, 3) the US and Korea use different approaches in selecting SES participants, which is closely related to equality in educational opportunities, 4) the major difference between the US and Korea is the openness of real markets for SES. Based on these findings, this study proposes practical implications for future SES in Korea and the US.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.26 no.7
• /
• pp.790-797
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the level-differentiated laboratory activities suggested by the 7th national curricula compared to the in-depth level activities only and supplementary level activities only. Two hundred 7th grade students attending a coed middle school were selected for this study and divided into three groups; level-differentiated, in-depth, and supplementary group. In each group, the students were subdivided into the in-depth level and the supplementary level by the formative test after completing the basic learning course. The in-depth and the supplementary laboratory activities were developed and engaged to the respective students in the level-differentiated group for one semester, while only the in-depth activities were engaged to the in-depth group and only the supplementary activities were engaged to the supplementary group. To examine the effects of treatments, the science knowledge test and the inquiry process skill test were administered before and after treatments and the students' opinions about the level-differentiated instruction were surveyed. The results showed that there were significant differences in the science knowledge achievements between the groups while no significant difference was found in the inquiry process skills. Post hoc analysis showed these differences were found between the level-differentiated group and the supplementary group. After the activities, most students in the level-differentiated group responded positively on doing level-differentiated activities except a few students in the supplementary level, These results justify the effectiveness of the level-differentiated laboratory activities compared to the supplementary only laboratory activities in middle school science classes.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.20 no.3 s.27
• /
• pp.483-502
• /
• 2006

In this research, we try to accomplish the main purpose of managing the special supplementary curriculum and set a model for its organization and management to the other schools by analyzing the result from the management of the special supplementary curriculum through mentoring lessons that are proposed in the 7th curriculum to provide the underachieved students with opportunities to study the subjects they couldn't understand during the regular curriculum.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.28 no.3
• /
• pp.259-265
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the application time of differentiated instruction in terms of learners' science academic knowledge achievement and their attitudes toward science. The findings of the study were as follows: First, the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (p<.05). Second, the academic knowledge achievement of high ability students of two subgroups was not different (p>.05), but the achievement of low ability students was higher in experimental group than in control group (p<.05). Third, the experimental group showed higher improvement in attitude toward science than the control group in three areas of the Test of Science Related Attitudes (TOSRA) (p<.05): 'Adaptation of Scientific Attitudes', 'Enjoyment of Science Lessons', and 'Career Interest in Science'. However, there was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the area of 'Attitude to Scientific Inquiry' and 'Leisure Interest in Science'.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.593-606
• /
• 2011

We carried out mathematics diagnostic tests for all first year engineering students at C University in Daejeon in 2008, covering precalculus and basic calculus. Then we divided into two classes such as regular and supplementary classes. The supplementary class students are lower 13% students. Then we gave extra classes for these students to support their basic and elementary calculus skills. As a result, these supplementary students received a meaningful accomplishment at the final exam. This paper analyzes the results and effects of various types of supplementary classes such as education by level, and proposes some strategies to enhance mathematics learning, particularly for under achieving first year engineering students.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.167-184
• /
• 2011

In D university, 2010 year engineering freshmen were taken basic mathematical ability test and were given basic mathematical ability improvement program based on the test. In order to study the effect of this program for scholastic achievement, we analyse basic mathematical ability test score and college mathematics score among student groups. And to study the effect of this program for scholastic motivation, we survey the mathematical inclination, the recognition of mathematics, and classes of mathematics. As results, engineering freshmen in D university were poor at basic mathematical ability and basic mathematical ability improvement program effected scholastic achievement and motivation in mathematics, greatly. For the success of college mathematics in engineering college, this study suggests basic mathematical ability test and the survey for engineering freshmen's mathematical background. Finally, we suggest that college mathematics must be focused on the improvement of basic mathematical abilities.

• Proceedings of the KGS Conference
• /
• 2001.12a
• /
• pp.152-156
• /
• 2001

• 한국데이터정보과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.49-57
• /
• 2005

지금의 교실 수업은 토론학습에 익숙한 학생들로 수업에 흥미를 가지는 수업에 관심을 많이 갖고 있으며 수준별 수업을 통한 심화.보충형과 특별 보충과정으로 학생 지도를 하고 있다. 교실마다 수학 학습을 기피하는 현상이 두드려지고 있으며 개인별 수준 차가 더욱 심한 상태라서 학생들에게 동기를 유발하여 수학에 대한 학습 의욕을 고취하고 교실 밖의 학습자를 교실내로 흡수하기 위한 방법론으로 모둠별 돌림수학, 수준별 모둠 구성을 통해 박수를 치기, 구구단을 이용한 학습과 수학 모둠 노래를 통하여 학습동기를 유발하는 학습 모형을 소개한다. 그리고 수행평가나 포트폴리오, 수학 감상문을 통해 동기 유발이 가능한 실제 학습을 개발하여 공교육의 내실화와 창의력을 유발하는 자아실현의 일환으로 신선한 교실 수업의 보탬이 되었으면 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.15 no.9
• /
• pp.137-144
• /
• 2010

We've run leveled intense and supplementary study groups connected with JAVA regular classes for more effective learning of computer programming. We performed the test for evaluating learning understanding degrees between before and after study to analyze learning effect for three leveled study groups and a non study group, and we also analyzed the differences of learning understanding degrees among 4 learner groups by computer programming areas. As a result, we can reach the result what programming areas are effective to be operated by intense and supplementary study groups. Those areas are the area to improve the ability of programming applying concepts through in-depth understanding of concepts, and the area of programming through mixed knowledges related each other. The study group for low-leveled learners has most improved of four groups. Low-leveled group was behind the other study groups on programming application ability, but the group was more excellent than non study group in most programming areas.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.103-115
• /
• 2000

The ability-grouping is the essence of the seventh educational curriculum, applied to school from year 2000, and its enriched-supplementary type will be carried out for science course. This study examines the effect of the enriched-supplementary ability-grouping within class to student's academic achievement and the attitude, related to science. Thus we developed teaching and learning methods with intellectual level about the subject of 'Water Circulation and Weather Change' in Middle-School Science 2. Then we tested 152 eighth graders who were divided into the experimental and control groups. The experimental one was taught through the ability-grouping for about six weeks, while the control through conventional lecture. The improvement of the experimental group in academic achievement was more effective than that of the control, and particularly to below-average students who ranked in lower thirty percent. The experimental one got more negative change in domain 'Science as a Subject, and in subdomain 'Anxiety in Science Lesson'. While outstanding students who ranked in upper thirty percent showed a significant positive change in subdomain 'Satisfaction in Teaching Method, the below-average were negatively changed in subdomain 'Anxiety in Science Lesson'. The current ability-grouping was suitable for the improvement of academic achievement, but not for the general attitude related to science. In order to enhance the ability-grouping effect in science education, we need to additionally consider student's interest and concern in grouping, and develop various teaching and learning methods together with proper textbook contents.