• Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.31-38
• /
• 2011

Turnkey and alternative-design contracts was introduced operation in the country from january 2004 to February 2010. this was introduced operation. The selecting method of contractor for turnkey projects has being operated by an open forum type that consists of technical committee and appraisal committee in an integrated design approach deliberations. But to improve the operation of the problems, the government is operating design review committee consisting of the central, local and special design advisory committee in march 2010. But this system has also been suggested as still problems, too many contracts by large companies, increasing of design cost and excessive competition. This study is intended to contribute that turnkey and alternative-design contracts can be well operated in domestic construction markets. In this paper suggests some improvement methods and operational problems caused from application of an open forum type for selecting contractor of turnkey project.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.771-780
• /
• 2013

Inspection system which was performed in the past selected the final winning bidder by separating Pre-Qualification, the basic design evaluation and price evaluation. However, turnkey and alternative bidding construction has selected way to determine the successful bidder as the best design and the most low cost method, comprehensive evaluation method (bid price adjustment, design score adjustments, weights standard), the best design and the fixed amount method from january 1, 2010 to the present. Due to these institutional problems, orders institutions were often a way to determine the successful bidder to apply differently for identical or similar construction. Therefore this study winning bidder selection criteria through analysis of construction the number and construction order performance, order performance by work division and institutional orders, the weights bidder order performance and orders status of turnkey alternative tendering construction to civil part performed in domestic.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.462-467
• /
• 2004

Design-build, which is defined as single source responsibility for design and construction, has been widely used in large public works since governmental formulation of measure for encouraging use of design-build in 1996. However, civic groups and small and medium sized enterprises are highlighting over-competition and unbalanced market shares of conglomerate in domestic design-bid market and insisting on decrease in the use of design-build and absorption into the lowest-price bidding. This study collected information about cost, schedule, quality, new technology adoption from 51 civil design-build projects and measured their performance.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2010

Currently, the unit price of public construction projects are not being evaluated appropriately for several reasons. First, the evaluation of the unit price differ per nature of the bidding process and its estimation process. In fact, pricing is determined to meet the total price in turnkey projects and to pass the low bid price deliberation process in unit price projects, and thus, such prices cannot be said to be reasonable prices per public project. After the contract is awarded, however, the prices determined without taking into consideration the characteristic of each bidding process and price estimate process are used for the valuation of progress payment, design changes, and escalation. Furthermore, this is also being applied to other low bid deliberation process as actual public project unit price, thereby affecting other processes as well. In effect, this system increases the risks for both the owner and the bidder who have determined the unit price. This research examines the risk factor and its extent in order to properly manage it in preparation for the future.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.97-102
• /
• 2008

The report of the Korean Board of Audit and Inspection(BAI) on May 2007 indicates the problems of Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis and evaluation in the Design-Build(Turn-Key) and alternative bidding system. The point which the report indicates is that the cost estimation system for LCC analysis has nothing in common each other and there's no consistency among the repair cycle and ratio per facilities parts. For solving these problems, BAI demands the establishment of the guidelines for LCC analysis and evaluation from the competent authority Korean Ministry of Construction And Transportation(MOCT). The objective of this study is to develop the improvement directions for LCC analysis and evaluation which are suitable to the public construction projects especially for the Design-Build and alternative bidding system in Korea. For this study, the LCC related raws and regulations, LCC analysis guidelines of public cooperations, actual condition of LCC analysis and evaluation which include, the elements of LCC, the estimation rules of the initial cost and the maintenance cost, the analysis standards of time value of money, etc. are investigated to provide the improvement directions for LCC analysis and evaluation.

• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.164-177
• /
• 2013

From 2010 years to 2013, the selection method of successful bidder has been changed design suitable lowest method, comprehensive evaluation method(bid price adjustment, design score adjustments, weight standards), fixed amount best design method. Therefore this study was presented by analyzing the impact on the domestic construction industry according the way to determine the successful bidder, the evaluation order method and the operational issues through the analysis of order status, order number, results of acceptance an order, success rate range, results of acceptance an order according to weight success rate, results of acceptance an order by work type and order institution of a turnkey alternative tendering construction performed in domestic civil part.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Studies
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.177-203
• /
• 1998

기존의 최초공모주 발행제도하에서는 일반투자자의 공모주식수요에 대한 의사가 공모가 결정과정에 반영될 수 있는 기회가 없음으로 인해 최초공모주의 심각한 저가발행 현상이 나타나고 있다. 이에 대한 문제점을 보완 개선하기 위하여 본 연구는 기업공개시 주식매각의 한 방안으로 경쟁입찰방식을 제시하였으며, 우리 나라 실정에 맞는 입찰모형의 설정을 위한 제반요인들을 조사 분석하였다. 또한, 경쟁입찰방식을 통한 최초공모주 발행의 장점과 경쟁입찰방식과 관련하여 예상되는 경제적 제 문제들을 공개입찰을 통한 장외등록기업 사레와 공기업민영화 사례를 통해 간접적으로 유추 검토하였다. 경쟁입찰방식하에서는 발행기업의 진실된 가치와 시장투자자들의 최초공모주에 대한 수요의사가 입찰과정을 통해 최적공모가격 결정에 적절히 반영되어 기존의 발행방식과 비교해 저평가율도 낮아질 것으로 기대되며, 심각한 문제가 없을 것이라는 판단하에 본 논문은 경쟁입찰방식을 통한 최초공모주발행이 기존의 발행방식에 대한 하나의 경제적 대안으로 선호될 수 있음을 보여 주었다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
• /
• v.8 no.5
• /
• pp.460-469
• /
• 2005

Turnkey contract system is an effective ordering system for the ordering organizations that technical engineers are insufficient for their construction projects. It is possible to reduce project duration and to improve project quality in an integrated contract system between design and construction. However, owners can have a difficulty caused from unitary responsibility system. This study analyzes present situation and problems of turnkey contract system including railway projects. The result includes various methods for improving the system based on the analysis of bid price and selection procedure.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.32 no.2
• /
• pp.144-170
• /
• 2010

This paper considers the effect of various types of procurement auction system on competition focusing on the rate of successful bidding. We analyze the number of bidders and the rate of successful bids using online procurement data of the Public Procurement Service. The average number of bidders is 301 and the average rate of successful bids is 87.42% while the weighted average rate is 75.13%. These numbers show that there is quite strong competition among bidders and the rate is lower as the expected price is higher. When we analyze the data of price procurement auction, the rate is also shown to be lower as the expected price is higher. Furthermore, the rate decreases as the number of bidders increases which naturally makes the competition stronger. Meanwhile, the analysis finds that the inclusion of the onsite bidding, the PQ(Pre-Qualification) result, or major-10 winning companies cannot explain the rate much in our data. In case of turnkey-alternative, the average rate of successful bidding for 484 cases record 90.20%. The average is 84.89% with 120 alternatives and 91.97% with 364 cases of turnkey. The reason why the rate of turnkey-alternative is lower than that of price procurement auction is the lack of competition as well as the systematic difference. By setting up a model, we are able to explain the difference in rate caused by the respective reason. When we suppose there are 3 bidders in case of price procurement auction for a project that exceeds 100 billion won, the rate is expected to be around 64%. This implies that difference of 26% is caused by the systemic difference and 3% by the lack of competition. Therefore, we conclude that the difference in rate between turnkey-alternative and price procurement auction is caused mainly by the systemic difference. In case of PPP(Public Private Partnership) projects, among 154 projects in total, only 40% has more than 2 bidders that compete. The average number of bidders is 1.88 which is less than 2, and the average rate of successful bids is 90%. In sum, under the price procurement auction, there is strong competition which is reflected by the rate of successful bids. However, there is room to decrease the rate by strengthening the competition under the turnkey-alternative. Also with PPP projects, we expect the rate can be steadily reduced with revived competition among bidders.

• Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.46-48
• /
• 2009