• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.19 no.1 s.21
• /
• pp.101-110
• /
• 2005

최근 학교 수학교육에서는 창의성 교육을 강조하고 있으며, 창의성을 향상시킬 수 있는 프로그램에 대한 다양한 연구가 진행되고 있다. 이러한 창의성을 향상시키기 위해서는 기계적인 계산에 의해서 한 가지 답을 구하는 학습보다는 탐구하고, 추측하고, 논리적으로 추론하고, 다양한 문제해결 전략을 구사할 수 있는 능력을 키우는 프로그램이 필요하다. 또, 이러한 프로그램이 학생들에게 활동을 통해 다양한 경험을 제공할 수 있다면 더욱 효과적일 것이다. 이 논문에서는 이러한 다양한 창의성 프로그램을 소개하였고, 창의성을 평가하는 방법을 소개하였다.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.57-63
• /
• 2009

This Paper presents a clearly explained and richly illustrated case study of assessment and evaluation for program outcomes in accreditation for engineering education, which describe what Program students are expected to be able to do by the time of graduation. In particular, the performance criteria based on performance level, assessment tools, and level-of-achievement rubrics for assessment of program outcomes in electrical engineering program of Kwangwoon university will be briefly addressed. Obviously, the assessment, evaluation, and improvement processes for the specified program outcomes should be continuously carried out to demonstrate that the program objectives and outcomes are being met.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.14 no.11
• /
• pp.930-943
• /
• 2014

Museums increasingly are expected to be accountable for effectiveness of both new and existing programs, and to broaden and diversify community members served. One approach is to expand program services beyond those for traditional on-site visitors to non-traditional more diverse populations, including at-risk populations. Program evaluators are challenged to verify achievement of such lofty goals in the short term and during early program implementation. Nevertheless, it is critical to examine impacts of newly developed programs to determine viability and to improve them. This study assessed the impacts and efficacy of an on-going, non-traditional museum program targeting transitional homeless people in the community. Results presented a strategy for conceptually framing an assessment of a collaborative museum program serving non-traditional museum clients. Also, this study showed how aspects of one program were perceived by participants, and how those perceptions correspond with program outcomes.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.23-29
• /
• 2018

There is a growing interest in computer based learning system that can learn a new concept of epistemic frames in response to the demands of $21^{st}$ century Skills. However, there is little research on the theoretical models for the epistemic frames applicable in the changing educational environment and the measurement theories (Psychometric theory, Learning Analytics) that can be evaluated. Therefore, in this study, we propose the core elements of the learning system prototype that can educate the epistemic frames in the practical community. Furthermore, this study explores and suggests an appropriate psychometric measurement theory (learning analytics) that allows us to measure, infer, and evaluate a learner.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.29-42
• /
• 2007

The 'Program outcomes and assessment' is an important criterion evaluating of engineering education in accreditation of engineering education. ABEEK prescribes program outcomes which are the basic capabilities in the application of the fundamental knowledge and practical tools of the engineering field. Also ABEEK asks to prove that all programs are constructed a proper educational curriculum and are satisfied program outcomes and CQI. Therefore program outcomes must satisfy both two key points. First, as a quality control aspect, engineering programs must prove that graduates of accredited programs can perform twelve capabilities. Second, as a continuous quality improvement aspect, accredited programs have to upgrade a level of engineering educational quality. Consequently the purpose of study is to introduce a new model for CQI and QC systems, implementing strategies as an actualizing of program outcomes.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.64-71
• /
• 2005

Portfolio contains works that a learner has selected and collected to show growth and change for a limited time period. In terms of an assessment tool, portfolio provides the results of the student with authentic, reflective, interactive and individuals features. Also portfolio provides an opportunity of improvement about curriculum and engineering program. To apply the excellency of portfolio, the principle of portfolio should be understood well and reflected the real state of engineering education. The basic concept of portfolio as a assessment tool of engineering program outcomes was introduced. The example of a portfolio has been also suggested in the form of interactive e-based model. The model has been developed that the assessment for program outcomes was rather done from a student standpoint.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 2010

It is strongly desirable to continuously study the program outcomes that are one of the requirements of engineering accreditation. In this paper, the results of program outcome evaluation obtained by using four tools - exit written exams, essay tests, capstone design, and an official English test - were compared to those of program outcome evaluation obtained by a course-embedded assessment method. The former evaluation was carried out for 15 students who graduated in February 2010 by using the four evaluation tools, while the latter was performed by using a course offered in the Spring and Fall semesters in 2009. Two evaluation results revealed no large difference in almost all 12 program outcomes, which indicates that course-embedded assessment would be one of the practical and effective program outcome evaluation tools.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.87-98
• /
• 2012

The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology has been implementing the government's recognition project regarding the program accrediting organizations in Higher Education. This research is to establish an evaluation model for the government's recognition process of the program accrediting organizations, and develop the evaluation categories, items and indices for the model. The research has set the concept for the government's recognition regarding the program accrediting organizations and designed an evaluation model for such organizations. The evaluation model embraces a preliminary evaluation process, assessing an eligibility of the accrediting organizations for the higher education based on the formalities set forth for the government recognition organization accrediting process. It also includes the main evaluation process, which assess the eligibility based on the evaluation standards stipulated in the associated legislation and regulations. In addition, through in-depth verification processes by experts, this research finalized 2 evaluation domains, 5 evaluation categories, 24 evaluation items and 33 evaluation indices.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.29-38
• /
• 2019

The evaluation of programs related to SW development often only provides the right answer of the student's program. The purpose of this study was to provide the baseline data about the contents of the program evaluation support the teacher's class and which part should be considered important in partial scoring. To accomplish the goal, we had two months of Python lessons for 90 middle school students in free-semester and analyzed 1185 source codes collected during the lessons. Result of analysis, many students made mistakes about syntax errors and teachers considered logic errors as important. Based on the result, it is necessary to reduce the student's syntax errors and teachers need to evaluate student's program with considering the importance of logical aspects and necessary to devise a partial scoring. This study has significance about consideration of program evaluation from the perspective of learning support and evaluation.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.178
• /
• pp.94-97
• /
• 2012