Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.3.023

Developing a Prototype of Learning Epistemic Frame using Computer based Learning System: Learning Analytics  

Choi, Younyoung (Department of Adolescent Counseling, Hanyang Cyber University)
Seo, Donggi (Department of Psychology, Hallym University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.9, no.3, 2018 , pp. 23-29 More about this Journal
Abstract
There is a growing interest in computer based learning system that can learn a new concept of epistemic frames in response to the demands of $21^{st}$ century Skills. However, there is little research on the theoretical models for the epistemic frames applicable in the changing educational environment and the measurement theories (Psychometric theory, Learning Analytics) that can be evaluated. Therefore, in this study, we propose the core elements of the learning system prototype that can educate the epistemic frames in the practical community. Furthermore, this study explores and suggests an appropriate psychometric measurement theory (learning analytics) that allows us to measure, infer, and evaluate a learner.
Keywords
Convergence; Epistemic Frame; Computer based Learning System; Learning Analytics;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. Gee. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrage. Macmillan. NY.
2 D. Gibson. C. Aldrch & M. Prensky. (2006). (Eds). Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks, Hershey, PA.
3 D. Shaffer. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic game. Computers and Education, 46(3), 223-234.   DOI
4 D. Shffer. (2006). How computer games help children learn. Palgrave. Macmillan. NY.
5 E. Bagley & D. Shaffer. (2009). When people get in the way: Promoting civic thinking through epstemic game play. International Journal of gaming and computer-mediated simulations. 1, 36-52.   DOI
6 B. Nelson. B. Erlandson & A. Denham. (2009). A design view of assessment in complex game environments. Presented at the third meeting of the assessment 21st century skill, Tempe, AZ.
7 C. T. Beck & R. K. Gable. (2001). Ensuring content validity: An illustration of the process. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 9, 201-15.
8 K. Simon & L. Karen (2001). Socializing Epistemic Cognition. Educational Research Review, 21, 17-32.
9 J. Lave & E. Wenger. (1991). Situated Learning. New York, Combridge University Press.
10 G. J. Kelly. S. MacDonald & P. Wickman. (2012). Science Learning and epistemology. in B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.). Second international handbook of science education. Springer. Netherlands.
11 A. Mavridis & T. Tsiatsos. (2017). Game-based Assessment: Investigating the impact on Test Anxiety and Exam Perforamnce. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(2), 137-150.   DOI
12 D. W. Shaffer. D. Hatfield. G. Svarovsky. N. Nash. P. Nulty, A. Bagley. E. Franke. K. Rupp. A. A & R. J. Mislevy. (2009). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st Century Assessment of Learning. International Journal of Laerning Media, 1(2), 33-53.
13 K. Dicerbo. (2017). Building the Evidentiary Argument in Game-based Assessment. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, .18, 7-18.
14 J. Kim. R. Almond & V. Shute. (2016). Applying Evidence-Centered Design for the Development of Game-based Assessments in Physics playground.ol, 16(2), 142-163.
15 R. Bajrachary & J. Thompson. (2016). Analytical Derivation: An Epistemic Game for Solving mathmatically Based Physics Problems, 12(1), 21.
16 A. Mavridis & T. Tsiatsos. (2017). Game-based Assessment: Investigating the impact on Test Anxiety and Exam Performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(2), 137-150.   DOI