• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.239
• /
• pp.28-30
• /
• 2010

국토해양부(장관 정종환)와 환경부(장관 이만의)는 6개 용도의 신축건축물에만 가능했던 친환경건축물 인증을 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 가능토록 하는 "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙" 개정안을 지난 5월17일 개정 공포('10.7.1 시행)했다. 이번 개정안은 저탄소 녹색건축물의 공급을 활성화하기 위해 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 대한 친환경인증[공공건축물(1만$m^2$ 이상)은 의무화, 민간건축물은 자발적 참여로 운영] 평가기준 마련과 인증기관의 전문성 강화 등을 주요내용으로 하고 있으며, 취 등록세 감면 등 인센티브 제도가 원활히 시행될 수 있도록 인증시기 및 절차를 개선하고, 인증등급을 세분화(2 $\rightarrow$ 4등급)하는 내용도 포함됐다. 국토해양부와 환경부는 이번 조치로 민간분야의 경우 본인들이 인센티브를 받기를 원하는 경우에는 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 하는 등 민간분야의 친환경설계를 적극 유도할 수 있는 기반을 마련했으며, "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙"의 차질 없는 시행을 위해 7월 1일까지 "친환경건축물 인증기준" (국토해양부, 환경부 공동 고시)을 개정할 계획이다. 한편, 내년부터는 기존 건축물도 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 그 대상범위를 확대해 나갈 예정이다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.258
• /
• pp.71-73
• /
• 2012

국토해양부는 지능형 건축물 인증제도의 활성화를 위하여 시행규칙과 고시를 각각 제정하고, 지난해 12월 1일 공포했다. 이 제정안은 2006년부터 지침으로 운영 중인 '지능형 건축물 인증제도'가 지난해 5월 건축법 개정으로 법적 근거가 마련되었고, 건축 기준 완화 인센티브가 확대됨에 따라 이번에 기존의 지능형 건축물 인증 세부시행 지침을 보완한 것이다. 이번 규칙 및 고시는 지능형 건축물 보급을 확대하기 위하여 업무시설 외에 공동주택, 판매시설, 문화 및 집회시설 등으로 인증대상을 확대하고, 원활한 인증제도 운영을 위한 인증기관 지정, 인증절차 및 인증등급의 세분화, 인센티브 적용 방법 등을 주요 내용으로 하고 있다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.318
• /
• pp.56-58
• /
• 2017

국토교통부는 녹색건축물 조성지원법 시행령 시행규칙을 개정하고 1월 20일부터 제로에너지건축물 인증제 시행에 들어간다. 제로에너지건축물은 고단열 건축자재와 신재생에너지를 결합하여 외부 에너지 유입을 최소화 한 건축물로 건축주는 인증을 원할 경우 인증기관에 신청하여 제로에너지건축물 인증을 받을 수 있으며, 인증받은 건축물에 대해서는 용적률 완화, 신재생에너지 설치보조금, 기부채납 부담률 완화 등의 인센티브가 제공된다.

• Digital Contents
• /
• no.10 s.89
• /
• pp.25-42
• /
• 2000

최근들어 사이버 아파트 붐이 일면서 시들해진 건축 경기에 새로운 바람이 불고 있다. 정보통신부는 이러한 흐름에 맞춰 초고속 정보통신 건물 인증제를 도입 법적.제도적 기초를 마련하였다. 이는 어느정도 요건을 갖춘 건축물에 대해서만 그 자격을 부여한다는 것이 이 제도의 핵심. 아직은 시행초기 단계이지만 향후 많은 건축물이 사이버 건축물로 지어질 것이며 이에 대비하고 불량 건축물의 난립을 방지하는 등 다목적성을 띠고 있다. 이에 정보통신부는 초고속 정보통신 건물에 대한 인증제를 도입해 사업자들의 참여를 유도하고 인증을 받은 회사에게는 인증에 대한 홍보효과로 분양촉진의 효과를, 입주자에게는 정보가 인증하는 건물에 대해 신뢰를 가질수 있게 하는등 다중의 효과를 노리고 있다. 정보통신부의 초고속 정보통신 건물인증제의 구체적인 내용과 인증제에 대한 현대 건설의 사례를 살펴봄으로써 초고속 정보통신 건물인증제에 접근해 보고자 한다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.58-65
• /
• 2014

This study aims to understand the environmental impact reduction of green buildings that are certified by Green standard for energy and environmental design(G-SEED). To ensure this end, this study assessed and compared the environmental impacts(global warning, ozone layer depletion, acidification, and eutrophication) of a G-SEED-certified elementary school building(green building) and an uncertified elementary school building(traditional building) using the life cycle assessment methodology. This study considered the environmental impacts from the material manufacturing, material transportation, on-site construction, and operation during 40 years. The comparison of the environmental impact intensity of two buildings showed that the green building generated much more environmental impacts than the traditional building. For example, the global warming potential of the green building was approximately 12.5% higher than of the traditional building since the global warming potential of the green building was 3.751 $t-CO_2eq./m^2$ while that of the traditional building was 3.282 $t-CO_2eq./m^2$. It signifies that the G-SEED doesn't guarantee the reduction of the environmental impacts in terms of four impact categories. Therefore, the G-SEED should be complemented and improved to achieve the environmental impact reduction.

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.32 no.10
• /
• pp.42-47
• /
• 2003

친환경 건축물의 건설을 유도$.$촉진하여 건축 분야에서 발생되는 환경부하를 저감시키고 건축물의 환경 친화적인 시공과 사용을 권장하기 위한 친환경 건축물 인증제도가 2002년 12월부터 시행중이다. 본 제도는 우선 공동주택을 대상으로 시행한 후 주상복합, 업무용, 상업용, 리모델링 건축물가지 단계적으로 확대하는 계획을 가지고 있다. 현재 시행중인 인증제도에서 친환경 건축물 평가지침은 1년 동안의 시범적용기간을 거쳤으며, 적용상 문제점이 노출되어 개정 작업을 준비중에 있다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.11
• /
• pp.33-43
• /
• 2019

Considerable efforts have been made to reduce greenhouse gas emission around the world to cope with climate change. The government is implementing G-SEED certification to promote energy efficient building design. This study aims to verify the effectiveness of the G-SEED certification system by analyzing the actual energy use of certified and non-certified office buildings. For this purpose, the energy consumption of 135 certified and 142 non-certified office buildings was analyzed according to the seasonal characteristics, building size and number of floors, approval year, and certification grade. The energy saving effects of certified buildings was about 50% higher than that of non-certified buildings. The seasonal energy consumption of buildings is closely related to the heating degree-days. The energy consumption of certified and non-certified buildings decreases with increasing approval year. On the other hand, the energy consumption according to building size and certification grade is not related. This study provides meaningful basic data of G-SEED certification system for future improvement. As the building energy performance standards are strengthened over the years, it is necessary to make the individual score of G-SEED certified projects open to the public to configure the factors of energy efficiency.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.50 no.5
• /
• pp.13-29
• /
• 2022

According to the revision of the Convenience Act for Persons with Disabilities, parks and park facilities where the first park development plan is established after December 4, 2021 are mandatory, and parks must be equipped with convenience facilities for the disabled. Hence, this study aims to derive the improvements of the park evaluation index by analyzing the park certification evaluation index, the building certification evaluation index of park facilities, and the evaluation reports of the current certification status cases. As a research method, first, the certification of parks and park facilities were compared and reviewed with the Park Green Act, and differences in the certification process and certification performance were compared and analyzed. Second, differences and common items were derived by analyzing barrier free (BF)-certification evaluation indicators for parks and buildings. Third, improvement plans were derived after analyzing differences and problems in 4 BF-certified parks and four building certification cases of park facilities in certified parks, focusing on the self-evaluation report and examination results. As a result of analyzing the park and building evaluation indicators, the items for which the evaluation purpose, evaluation method, and evaluation items were commonly applied to 7 access roads for each facility, 5 parking areas for the disabled, 2 guide facilities for information facilities, 14 in 5 categories of sanitation facilities, and 1 for other facilities. In the case of sanitation facilities, there is no case where it was evaluated as a park. If the park does not have an attached toilet, the park is certified as a building. Hence, it would be essential to establish the concept of an attached toilet and discuss the application of the evaluation index on the park sanitation facility. The score of buildings in parks and park facilities was lower than that of the self-evaluation results, and the certification grades of buildings declined in three cases. The items with the highest standard deviation were BF walking continuity for parks and the path to the main entrance among access roads for buildings. As a result of analyzing the park and building evaluation results of 19 common evaluation items except for sanitary facilities, the difference in the grades of the evaluation items for each case site except for one item appeared. Therefore, applying common detailed calculation criteria for items evaluated in common with parks and buildings is needed. Since sanitation facilities have no cases of park certification and are not certified as buildings, it is essential to establish the concept of attached toilets and discuss the application of park sanitation evaluation indicators. It is necessary to develop an evaluation index suitable for the characteristics of the park, such as adjusting the items that are not evaluated in parks and establishing an evaluation index considering the ones of parks. It expects that this study would be used as primary data for improving park certification indicators.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.6354-6365
• /
• 2014

This study aims to suggest a direction to develop Korea's certification system by comparing the evaluation items between Korea's G-SEED (Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design) and Germany's sustainable building certification. A number of eco-friendly building certification systems are being implemented globally. On the other hand, mutually comparable evaluation items have not been suggested up until now. Therefore, international standards have been trying to establish evaluation criteria for eco-friendly buildings, and Germany's sustainable building certification is the first certification standard that has accepted those evaluation criteria. According to the result of comparing Korea's green building certification with Germany's sustainable certification, the green building certification has evaluation items not only on environmentality (62.6%), but also on social aspects (25.4%) and economic aspects (3.0%). This suggests a crucial direction to the development of evaluation items regarding the social and economic aspects of green building certification.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.453-464
• /
• 2023

This research conducts a comparative analysis of the perceived importance of advancing zero energy building certification from the viewpoints of two major stakeholders - designers and building energy assessors. Both groups prioritized the importance of policy, technology, education, incentives, and promotion respectively. For designers, enhancing energy efficiency standards, developing a skilled energy workforce, and implementing an office registration system emerged as critical factors in invigorating the certification process. The findings suggest potential avenues for the government to formulate realistic strategies for boosting the certification activity.