• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.30 no.4
• /
• pp.169-198
• /
• 2014

Due to the recent worldwide economic downturn, companies are required to put more effort into their innovation and quality improvement. In particular, business relationship is increasingly emphasized to be changed from a vertical relationship to a more horizontal relationship, such as collaborative partnership based on trust. In the logistics industry, through the collaboration, consignors can gain competitive advantages by focusing on their core capabilities, and freight forwarders also take advantages of securing stable cargoes and specialist expertise in distribution. Therefore, this study aims to identify key factors for developing a collaborative partnership between freight forwarders and consignors, and further examine the differences between the two groups empirically by using questionnaire survey. Based on the results, the main factors were found as follows: 1) Trust Building, 2) Competence Improvement, 3) Business Ecosystem and 4) Government Assistance. According to the analysis on sub-factors, first, among the four main factors, it turned out that trust is the most important variable. Specifically, the sub-factor of providing regular and stable service was revealed to be most critical. Second, it was found that forwarders need to improve services on 'Information Exchange System' and 'Electronic Data Interchange'. Finally, it is necessary for both consignors and forwarders to have better understanding of partnership. Key implications for both groups are highlighted based on the results.

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.40
• /
• pp.39-76
• /
• 2022

The two religious ethics, Christianity's 'love your enemies' and Daesoon Jinrihoe's 'grievance-resolution for mutual beneficence', can be misunderstood as similar. The misunderstanding arises from these religious ethics having something in common that specifically points to a particular object, called an enemy, and contains instructions to treat that object altruistically. However, from the perspective of Religious Ethics, the two teachings are not the same. The beliefs they are based upon are different, the religious character they pursue is different, and their processes of obtaining legitimacy, logic, and implementation are different. The most distinct difference between these ethics is that the Christian ethic focuses on a victim's role whereas Daesoon Jinrihoe ethic emphasizes the roles of both victims and perpetrators. In case of 'love your enemies,' if a perpetrator turns away from a victim and believes that they would be forgiven for their sin, the victim is unlikely to practice the teaching 'love your enemies.' Accordingly, to avoid criticism over cases wherein love of an enemy is nothing but a shallow grace, the roles of the two sides should be more highlighted than that of the absolute being. As for grievance-resolution for mutual beneficence, this teaching encourages victims to resolve their grievance with a goal of mutual beneficence. The perpetrator should likewise resolve the grievances and grudges of their victim with the aim of mutual beneficence. Jeungsan especially stressed that perpetrators have to resolve 'Cheok (慼: the resentment and grievances that someone holds against the one who victimized them)' through the ethic of grievance-resolution in order for living well. In other words, 'the ethic of Cheok-resolution' is an ethic wherein the perpetrator also plays an important role in the implementation of grievance-resolution for mutual beneficence.

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.35
• /
• pp.295-330
• /
• 2020

This paper examines the current state of the field wherein theoretical issues of ecology are still in need of concentration. Ecological texts are reconsidered from a religious worldview by extracting eco-friendly notions within religion and discourse is also essential in the practical field. As a case study on this matter, this paper aims to describe various aspects of ecological theory in Daesoon Jinrihoe, a new religious movement in Korea. In short, in its view of the natural world, Daesoon Jinrihoe values that all things originated from the Supreme God who presides over them, and the two are organically interrelated. Hence, the principle of nature is cherished. Especially as the Later World draws near, the fundamental basis of nature is slated to undergo change, and this also features heavily in Daesoon Jinrihoe's view of the natural world. Furthermore, the Supreme God reforms nature, and human beings live lives in conformity and resonance with that reformed nature. Above all else, the doctrines of haewon sangsaeng (the resolution of grievances for mutual beneficence) and boeun sangsaeng (the reciprocation of favors for mutual beneficence) are advocated in Daesoon Jinrihoe. Each supports its own form of ecological discourse, and together, they can be called Sangsaeng Ecological Theory (the Ecological Theory of Mutual Beneficence). Specific discussions of Daesoon Jinrihoe and ecology should be considered in light of this finding.

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.30
• /
• pp.131-162
• /
• 2018

In this article, I studied how we can heal resentment (㝨) and regret (恨) in the present and future world that are deeply rooted in our society, and I sought out the theoretical and practical measures to realize peace and mental well-being of the Korean people. For this purpose, firstly, I reinterpreted the content of 'Hongik Ingan Humanitarianism (弘益人間)' as an idea and its practical methods into a critical perspective, and confirmed that it is the ideological and emotional root of the Korean people. And I looked at concrete action plans for the present and in the future. Next, I studied the contents of the 'Accompaniment Society (大同社會)' for studying abroad and how to realize its ideals. Through this process, it was confirmed that Accompaniment Society is also deeply rooted in the sentiments of the Korean people. I also found out that more active and practical theoretical methodological studies are necessary to heal the resentment and regret common in our society. Lastly, I studied the fundamental and essential meaning of 'The Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence (解冤相生),' the major, representative concept of 'The Truth of the Great Itineration (大巡眞理).' Through this process, I confirmed the possibility that the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence could be transformed into a universal value and could be sublimated to a practical norm in the future. In particular, I found that the logic of "the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence" is highly practical in resolving feelings of resentment in the Korean people. Through the above study, 'The Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence' of 'The Truth of the Great Itineration' can emerge as a 'win-win' system of ethics in the future through the synthetical comprehension of the ideals of 'Hongik Ingan Humanitarianism' and Accompaniment Society.

• Food Science and Industry
• /
• v.52 no.4
• /
• pp.401-409
• /
• 2019

The need for win-win cooperation between small and medium-sized enterprises and large corporations is emphasized. For the sustainable growth of a healthy industry, the attractive parts of large companies and the capabilities of small and medium-sized enterprises must be harmonized and shared. It was also examined what items large companies should consider in selecting small and medium-sized enterprises as a partner. In the case of food producers, when considering safety issues, a comprehensive safety system should be established, not just a single factor. And cooperation is expected between small and medium-sized enterprises and other partners with new technologies such as AI, IoT, 3D printers and 5G technology. It is suggested that corporate development can be achieved by various models through win-win cooperation between large companies and small and medium-sized enterprises.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2010.05b
• /
• pp.708-711
• /
• 2010

본 연구는 국내유통산업의 구조를 중심으로 우리나라 유통산업의 실태와 문제점. 특히 유통대기업과 지방유통업간의 상생협력과 유통구조의 문제점을 조사 분석하였다. 특히 이들 간에 발생하고 있는 다양한 상충적 요인을 중심으로 연구 분석 하였다. 우리나라유통산업은 국민경제적 측면에서 매우 중요한 산업으로 발전하고 있으며, 1996년 유통시장의 전면개방 이후 국내 유통산업이 구조적으로 큰 변화를 겪게 되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 유통산업의 세계화와 경쟁력 확보를 위해 유통구조와 유통형태에 따라 나타나는 운영의 문제점과 현황을 파악하여 그러한 문제점을 극복하기 위한 대안으로서 상생협력의 방안을 제안하고자 하였다.

• The tire
• /
• s.244
• /
• pp.10-19
• /
• 2010

지난 몇 달간 대중소기업간 상생협력이 또다시 세간의 관심사로 부상했다. 금년 들어서 국내 대기업의 경영성과가 사상 최고치를 기록하고 있는 가운데 중소기업의 성과가 상대적으로 부진하기 때문이다 지난 몇 년간 국내 기업간 상생협력이 강조되어 왔으나, 납품단가 인하 문제를 비롯해서 대중소기업간의 고질적인 문제가 개선되지 않고 있다. 중장기적으로 대중소기업간의 문제가 과연 어떠한 요인에 의해서 발생하고 있는지를 심층 분석하고 시스템 차원에서 문제를 해결하기 보다는 사안에 따라 임기응변식으로 문제해결에 나섰기 때문이다. 또한 산업의 세계화와 기업경영의 복잡성이 심화되고 있는 가운데 과거의 잣대로 문제의 원인을 파악하고 관련 정책이 기업의 전략을 뛰어넘지 못하고 있기 때문이다. 본고에서는 최근 논란이 되고 있는 기업간 상생협력의 문제와 개선 방안을 자동차산업의 동반 성장전략 차원에서 살펴보기로 한다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.250
• /
• pp.28-43
• /
• 2011

정부가 대 중소기업간 상생협력을 본격 추진하기 위해 지난해 말 동반성장위원회를 구성하면서 동반성장 정책이 활기를 띄고 있다. 올해 말에는 56개 대기업(건설사 12개 업체)의 동반성장 및 공정거래 협약 실적이 평가 된다. 이에 따라 대기업은 동반성장 협력 방안을 잇달아 내놓고 있다. 지난 4월 15일 10대 대형건설사가 공정거래 및 동반성장 협약을 체결한 것도 정부의 이러한 정책을 반영하기 위함이다. 서울시 등 일부 지자체도 상생을 위한 하도급 정책을 속속 내놓고 있다. 서울시는 하도급 문화 개선 을 위해 ${\Delta}$하도급 직불제 ${\Delta}$표준계약서 사용 ${\Delta}$주계약자 공동도급제 등 3가지 분야를 확대시행 정책 과제로 삼고 올해부터 집중 추진하기로 했다. 인천시 종합건설본부도 4월부터 하도급 대금 직불제 시행에 들어갔다. 본지는 핫이슈로 떠오르고 있는 정부의 동반성장 정책 방향 및 제도개선 현황과 서울시의 하도급 정책, 동반성장지수 평가 대상업체인 12개 건설사의 상생협력 방안에 대해 알아본다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2021.11a
• /
• pp.14-16
• /
• 2021

This study is based on the circumstances such as accessibility of the Gyeonggi sea, marina facilities, limitations of fishery resources, and super-aging of fishing villages. This study is to identify the causes of conflicts in coastal spaces for the coexistence of fishing villages and marine leisure, and to revitalize islands in the metropolitan area. The purpose of the study is suggesting an efficient use of coastal space by utilizing the characteristics of the Gyeonggi sea area ‥‥

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.40
• /
• pp.1-38
• /
• 2022

The aim of this research is to discover the value of peace conveyed by Haewon Sangsaeng, the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence, as espoused by Holy Teacher Kang Jeungsan (姜甑山, 1871~1909) and to evaluate its modern significance. To the faithful, Jeungsan is seen as the Supreme God who descended into the world in the Late Joseon Dynasty in the year 1871. Until the time of His passing away into Heaven in 1909, He vastly saved the world and fulfilled the hopes of humankind by carrying out the fundamentally innovative Reordering Works of Heaven and Earth (1901~1909) in the Three Realms of Heaven, Earth, and Humanity. He has thereby been appraised as a great religious figure within religious and academic circles. Jeungsan's ideological contributions can be summarized into two main points. One is the concept of 'the Great Opening and the Later World,' which foreshadowed the liquidation of the old system of order and the arrival of a new world. The other contribution is the concept of 'the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence,' a fundamental principle meant to achieve human salvation and world peace. In this context, 'the Great Opening' is precisely a 'positivistic religious expression of peace,' and 'the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence' is the principle by which 'peace can be achieved in the world for all humankind.' In particular, the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence is a tenet within the doctrine of Daesoon Jinrihoe, and it is the main concept that forms the basis of Daesoon Thought. It can be said to be the core current that flows through Jeungsan's Reordering Works of Heaven and Earth. Nowadays, the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence is being discussed and cited in various ways in academic fields as well as in discourse on coexistence, mutual beneficence, and peace. The Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence is specifically based on observations of the structure of conflicts as observed throughout world history via global conflicts, regional conflicts, cultural conflicts, ideological conflicts, class conflicts, generational conflicts, racial conflicts, religious conflicts, and other such conflicts. That is why the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence is discussed in depth within academic settings wherein the nature of conflict-resolution is examined. Looking at the previous studies on this topic, those studies tended to focus on key concepts or concerns such as human beings, divine beings, the earthly paradise of the Later World, ideal societies, world peace, new principles of order, and lasting peace. In particular, the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence has been presented as directly related to concepts such as love, coexistence, harmony, and peace for humankind and the world. Its significance has been applied to ethics, philosophy, order, and principles, and it has been understood as conveying values such as peace. Accordingly, this paper examines the ideological connections to the succession and establishment of Jeungsan's notion of the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence based on previous research, but further examines the value of peace communicated via the principles and ideas that pervade current discourse on the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence. I hope to thoroughly explore Haewon Sangsaeng in regards to its modern significance to the world and to humankind.