A Study on the Performance Evaluation and Field Application of Synthetic Resin Formwork

합성수지 거푸집의 성능평가 및 현장 적용성에 관한 연구

Abstract

In This study, length variation test, shock test, and noise test were conducted to evaluate the performance of synthetic resin form. In addition, the handling easiness of synthetic resin form was examined through field application. Results of both thermal length variation test and shock test satisfied the KS standards. for noise test, the result of uro-form was 106.7dB(A) in average while that of synthetic resin form was 100.4dB(A) in average. It is considered that the high sound pressure level of euro-form with this noise characteristic may have negative physical and psychological impact on people who are consistently exposed in the residential area. Finally, there was no warping or bulging of the mold during concrete placement in the field application. Also, the concrete surface finish of synthetic resin form was better than that of euro-form.

본 논문은 합성수지 거푸집 성능평가를 위해 길이 변화율, 충격시험, 소음테스트를 실시하였다. 또한 현장 적용을 통해 합성수지 거푸집 시공성에 대해 검토하였다. 실험결과, 가열 길이 변화 시험, 충격시험은 KS기준치를 모두 만족하는 것으로 나타났다. 소음 테스트의 경우 유로폼이 평균 106dB(A)을 나타냈으며, 합성수지 거푸집은 평균 100.4dB(A)을 나타났다. 음압레벨의 경우, 합성수지 거푸집이 유로폼보다 고주파영역에서 낮게 나타나 시공시 소음 피로도가 적고 주변민원은 감소할 것으로 판단된다. 마지막으로 현장적용결과, 콘크리트 타설 중 거푸집 휨 현상이나 배부름 현상은 발생하지 않았다. 또한 콘크리트 표면 마감도가 합성수지 거푸집이 유로폼면 보다 더 우수한 것으로 나타났다.

Figure 1. Low density polyethylene(LDPE)

Figure 2. thermal length variation test body

Figure 4. Experimental photograph

Figure 3. Noise test specimen

Figure 5. Panoramic photograph

Figure 6. Synthetic resin form construction

Figure 7. Frequency noise factor according to form type

Figure 8. Euro-form and Synthetic resin form connection

Figure 9. Wall concrete placing

Figure 10. Concrete finish

Table 1. Experimental plan

Table 2. Quality standard of thermal length variation test

Table 3. Eggplant type weight division

Table 4. Experimental plan

Table 5. Environmental condition

Table 6. Site summary

Table 7. Thermal length varition test

Table 8. Impact test result

Table 9. Noise test result