DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

보육서비스 인프라가 영유아 부모의 지역사회 가족친화성 인식에 미치는 영향 : 서울시 25개 구를 중심으로

Child-Care Infrastructures and the Perception of Community Family-Friendliness : Parents with Young Children in 25 Provinces in Seoul

  • 유재언 (한국보건사회연구원) ;
  • 진미정 (서울대학교 아동가족학과.생활과학연구소)
  • Yoo, Jae-Eon (Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs) ;
  • Chin, Meejung (Dept. of Child Development and Family Studies.Research Institute of Human Ecology, Seoul National Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.13
  • 심사 : 2013.05.27
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30

초록

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of family-friendly community policy and child care policy on parents with young children. Particularly, two specific questions were addressed: 1) Were there differences in the perception of community family-friendliness among parents with young children in Seoul provinces? 2) Were there differences in the perception of community family-friendliness among parents with young children, depending on child-care infrastructures in Seoul provinces? Data for this study were drawn from multiple sources. Individual-level indicators were drawn from the survey of 1,246 parents with children under age 6 in Seoul. Community-level indicators were drawn from the 2011 Seoul census data. Frequency, descriptive statistics, GIS mapping, and hierarchical linear model analysis were conducted to examine the perception of community family-friendliness by individual, child-care infrastructures, and the community at large. The major results of the present study are as follows: The perception of parents on community family-friendliness varied across the 25 provinces in Seoul. The perception of community family-friendliness was positively related with the total number of child day-care centers, and the number of infant-toddler child daycare centers. The number of accredited child daycare centers was negatively associated with the perception of community family-friendliness.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김남신(2005). GIS실습 -아크뷰를 활용한 지도 제작과 공간 분석. 개정판. 파주: 한울.
  2. 김두섭․강남준(2008). 회귀분석 기초와 응용. 개정판. 경기도 파주: 나남.
  3. 김혜영․홍승아․이택연․선보영․진미정․홍성만(2009). 가족친화 사회환경 조성 실태조사. 보건복지부.
  4. 보건복지부(2011). 저출산․고령화 대책 추진현황. 저출산고령화대책특별위원회 업무보고.
  5. 서문희․김은설․최진․안재진․최혜선․김유경․조애저 (2009a). 전국보육실태 -가구조사 보고서. 보건복지가족부. 육아정책개발센터.
  6. 서문희․안재진․최혜선․소마 나오꼬․안진(2009b). 영유아 양육비용 지원의 효과에 관한 연구. 육아정책연구소 연구보고서. 연구보고 2009-05.
  7. 안우환(2004). 논문 작성을 위한 교육통계. 경기도 파주: 한국학술정보(주).
  8. 이삼식․최효진․정혜은(2010). 저출산정책 효과성 평가 연구. 한국보건사회연구원. 연구보고서 2010-30-15.
  9. 이재열 등(2005). 사회과학의 고급계량분석: 원리와 실제. 서울:서울대학교출판부.
  10. 이희연․노승철(2012). 고급통계분석론 -이론과 실습-. 경기도 파주: 법문사.
  11. 진미정(2010). 일-가족 양립을 위한 지역사회 돌봄 네트워크의 해외 사례 연구. 여성가족부. 2010-14.
  12. 홍승아․김혜영․류연규(2007). 가족친화적 사회환경 구축 방안 연구 -직장․지역사회의 모형개발을 중심으로-. 한국여성정책연구원.
  13. 홍승아․김혜영․류연규․相馬直直(상마직직)․조순주․ 진미정(2007). 가족친화적 지역사회 모형개발 연구. 한국여성정책연구원.
  14. Barksdale, L, C., Ottley, G, P., Stepgens, R., Gebreselassie, T., Fua, I., Azur, M., & Walrath-Greene, C.(2012). System-level change in cultural and linguistic competence(CLC): How changes in CLC are related to service experience outcomes in systems of care. Am J Community Psychol. 49, 483-493. DOI 10.1007/s10464-011-9442-1
  15. Cha, S. & Lee, H.(2011). A study on preferences for apartment interiors, exteriors, and neighborhood environment for a family friendly community environment -Focused on apartment dwellers in Daejeon city-. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 15(2), 45-62.
  16. Chaskin, J, R.(1997). Perspectives on neighborhood and community: A review of the literature. Social Service Review. 71(4), 523-547.
  17. Choi, Y.(2012). Nursery facilities employees' perceptions of re-certification and job satisfaction. Korea Journal of Child Education and Care. 12(1), 19-57.
  18. Claudia J. C., Jennings, Z, M., & Chan, T.(2012). How big is my neighborhood? Individual and contextual effects on perceptions of neighborhood scale. Am J Community Psychol, Published online 11, DOI 10.1007/s10464-012-9550-6
  19. Finello, M, K., & Poulsen, K, M.(2012). Unique system of care issues and challenges in serving children under age 3 and their families. AM J Community Psychol. 49, 417-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9458-6
  20. Francis, G., & Castles, G, F.(2003). The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 13(3), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287030133001
  21. Garcia, A., Aisenberg, E., & Harachi, T.(2012). Pathways to service inequalities among Latinos in the child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1060-1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.011
  22. Gelman, A., & Hill, J.(2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierachical models. Cambridge; N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Godfrey, B, E., Osher, D., Williams, D, L., Wolf, S., Berg, J, K., Torrete, C., Spier, E., & Aber, L, J.(2012). Cross-national measurement of school learning environment: Creating indicators for evaluating UNICEF's child friendly schools initiative. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 546-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.015
  24. Jeong, Y.(2009). A study of the parent's perceptions of evaluative accreditation system: Focusing on certified facilities. Journal of Early Childhood Education & Educare Administraion, 13(4), 311-332.
  25. Jun, S.(2011). Consumption and satisfaction level of the childcare services: A study targeting childcare services for children below two years. Consumer Policy and Education Review, 7(2), 61-85.
  26. Jung, M. & Cho, B.(2011). A multi-level study of contextual effects of community capacity on health status among Seoul residents: focused on social quality. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 28(4), 1-14.
  27. Kim, S. & Lee, S.(2010). A qualitative case study focused on the national pilot project to make family-friendly communities. Korean Family Resource Management Association, 14(4), 101-126.
  28. Kim, Y. & Kim, H.(2010). Study on the comparison of child care service indx based on each type for qualitative management of care service centers focused on Seoul Metropolitan government. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 15(2), 103-125.
  29. Lee, M.(2009). Difference of recognition between childcare service subjects: Focused on Seoul. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 14(5), 153-174.
  30. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J.(2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309-337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309
  31. Lim, M.(2009). Examination of the postscript of the day care center passed the evaluation and certification. 학교교육연구, 7(2), 77-93.
  32. Noh, S. & Chin, M.(2012). The influence of perceived family-friendliness of community on parenting efficacy and stress among parents with preschoolers. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 30(3), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2012.30.3.135
  33. Park, K. & Kang, H.(2009). A study on parent satisfaction level with accredited daycare centers. 경주연구, 18(1), 44-71.
  34. Park, J.(2010). The influence of family-friendly life environment factors on the effect of multiple roles of married men/women with children : Focused on living environment satisfaction, family support facility satisfaction, family support program satisfaction, nurture and education environment satisfaction, and living environment information accessibility. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 28(5), 53-66.
  35. Park, S., Lee, W., Kim, H., & Ryu, J.(2009). 가족친화환경 조성을 위한 생활가로 연구. Family and Culture, 21(1), 151-174.
  36. Raudenbush, S, W., & Bryk, A, S.(2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  37. Roberts, E, G.(2001). New Jersey Local Government Benefits Practices Survey. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 21, 284-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X0102100402
  38. Roberts, E, G., Gianakis, A, J., McCue, C., & Wang, X.(2004). Traditional and Family-Friendly Benefits Practices in Local Governments: Results from a National Survey. Public Personnel Management, 33(3), 307-330.
  39. Sampson, R, J.(2012). Great American city. Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago ; London: The university of chicago press.
  40. Singh, N, N., Curtis, J, W., Wechsler, A, H., Ellis, R, C., & Cohen, R.(1997). Family Friendliness of Community-Based Services for Children and Adolescents with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders and Their Families: An Observational Study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 5(2), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669700500203
  41. Sweet, S., Swisher, R., & Moen, P.(2005). Selecting and Assessing the Family-Friendly Community: Adaptive Strategies of Middle-Class, Dual-Earner Couples. Family Relations, 54(5), 596-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00344.x
  42. Swisher, R., Sweet, S., & Moen, P.(2004). The Family- Friendly Community and Its Life Course Fit for Dual-Earner Couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00020.x
  43. Timperio, A., Ball, K., Salmon, J., Roberts, R., Giles-Corti, B, M., Simmons, D., Baur, A, L., Crawford, D. (2006). Personal, Family, Social, and Environmental Correlates of Active Commuting to School. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(1), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.047
  44. Yoo, J. & Chin, M.(2012). Perception of community family-friendliness among parents with young children in urban and rural areas. Journal of Korean Home Management Association. 30(6), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2012.30.6.039
  45. 국가통계포털 KOSIS. 2011 인구동향조사. http://kosis.kr/index/index.jsp
  46. 서울통계연보. http://stat.seoul.go.kr
  47. 서울특별시교육청. http://www.sen.go.kr
  48. 서울특별시보육정보센터. http://seoul.childcare.og.kr
  49. SGIS통계지리서비스. http://sgis.kostat.go.kr
  50. NEWS1(2012). [연표]서울시 보육정책. 2012. 10. 28. http://news1.kr/articles/870371

피인용 문헌

  1. How Family, Work, and Community Resources Affect Family to Work Conflict and Facilitation of Employed Mothers vol.56, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.004
  2. A Conceptualization of Family Friendly Community from the Perspective of Family Policy vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13049/kfwa.2018.23.2.9