• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.76-84
• /
• 2020

Background: Determination of inter-method differences between clinically available volumetry methods are essential for the clinical application of brain volumetry in a wider context. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-method reliability and differences between the Siemens morphometry (SM) software and the NeuroQuant (NQ) software. Materials and Methods: MR images of 86 subjects with subjective or objective cognitive impairment were included in this retrospective study. For this study, 3D T1 volume images were obtained in all subjects using a 3T MR scanner (Skyra 3T, Siemens). Volumetric analysis of the 3D T1 volume images was performed using SM and NQ. To analyze the inter-method difference, correlation, and reliability, we used the paired t-test, Bland-Altman plot, Pearson's correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and effect size (ES) using the MedCalc and SPSS software. Results: SM and NQ showed excellent reliability for cortical gray matter, cerebral white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid; and good reliability for intracranial volume, whole brain volume, both thalami, and both hippocampi. In contrast, poor reliability was observed for both basal ganglia including the caudate nucleus, putamen, and pallidum. Paired comparison revealed that while the mean volume of the right hippocampus was not different between the two software, the mean difference in the left hippocampus volume between the two methods was 0.17 ml (P < 0.001). The other brain regions showed significant differences in terms of measured volumes between the two software. Conclusion: SM and NQ provided good-to-excellent reliability in evaluating most brain structures, except for the basal ganglia in patients with cognitive impairment. Researchers and clinicians should be aware of the potential differences in the measured volumes when using these two different software interchangeably.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제54권6호
• /
• pp.487-493
• /
• 2021

Background: Predicting postoperative lung function after pneumonectomy is essential. We retrospectively compared postoperative lung function to predicted postoperative lung function based on computed tomography (CT) volumetry and perfusion scintigraphy in patients who underwent pneumonectomy. Methods: Predicted postoperative lung function was calculated based on perfusion scintigraphy and CT volumetry. The predicted function was compared to the postoperative lung function in terms of forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), using 4 parameters: FVC, FVC%, FEV₁, and FEV₁%. Results: The correlations between postoperative function and predicted function based on CT volumetry were r=0.632 (p=0.003) for FVC% and r=0.728 (p<0.001) for FEV₁%. The correlations between postoperative function and predicted postoperative function based on perfusion scintigraphy were r=0.654 (p=0.002) for FVC% and r=0.758 (p<0.001) for FEV₁%. The preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores were significantly higher in the group in which the gap between postoperative FEV₁ and predicted postoperative FEV₁ analyzed by CT was smaller than the gap analyzed by perfusion scintigraphy (1.2±0.62 vs. 0.4±0.52, p=0.006). Conclusion: This study affirms that CT volumetry can replace perfusion scintigraphy for preoperative evaluation of patients needing pneumonectomy. In particular, it was found to be a better predictor of postoperative lung function for poor-performance patients (i.e., those with high ECOG scores).

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.450-461
• /
• 2020

Objective: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the agreement of cardiac computed tomography (CT) with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in the assessment of right ventricle (RV) volume and functional parameters. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies that compared CT with CMRI as the reference standard for measurement of the following RV parameters: end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), or ejection fraction (EF). Meta-analytic methods were utilized to determine the pooled weighted bias, limits of agreement (LOA), and correlation coefficient (r) between CT and CMRI. Heterogeneity was also assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the probable factors affecting measurement of RV volume: CT contrast protocol, number of CT slices, CT reconstruction interval, CT volumetry, and segmentation methods. Results: A total of 766 patients from 20 studies were included. Pooled bias and LOA were 3.1 mL (-5.7 to 11.8 mL), 3.6 mL (-4.0 to 11.2 mL), -0.4 mL (5.7 to 5.0 mL), and -1.8% (-5.7 to 2.2%) for EDV, ESV, SV, and EF, respectively. Pooled correlation coefficients were very strong for the RV parameters (r = 0.87-0.93). Heterogeneity was observed in the studies (I² > 50%, p < 0.1). In the subgroup analysis, an RV-dedicated contrast protocol, ≥ 64 CT slices, CT volumetry with the Simpson's method, and inclusion of the papillary muscle and trabeculation had a lower pooled bias and narrower LOA. Conclusion: Cardiac CT accurately measures RV volume and function, with an acceptable range of bias and LOA and strong correlation with CMRI findings. The RV-dedicated CT contrast protocol, ≥ 64 CT slices, and use of the same CT volumetry method as CMRI can improve agreement with CMRI.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.102-113
• /
• 2019

Objective: To assess the accuracy and potential bias of computed tomography (CT) ventricular volumetry using semiautomatic three-dimensional (3D) threshold-based segmentation in repaired tetralogy of Fallot, and to compare them to those of two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 32 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot who had undergone both cardiac CT and MRI within 3 years. For ventricular volumetry, semiautomatic 3D threshold-based segmentation was used in CT, while a manual simplified contouring 2D method was used in MRI. The indexed ventricular volumes were compared between CT and MRI. The indexed ventricular stroke volumes were compared with the indexed arterial stroke volumes measured using phase-contrast MRI. The mean differences and degrees of agreement in the indexed ventricular and stroke volumes were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The indexed end-systolic (ES) volumes showed no significant difference between CT and MRI (p > 0.05), while the indexed end-diastolic (ED) volumes were significantly larger on CT than on MRI (93.6 ± 17.5 mL/m² vs. 87.3 ± 15.5 mL/m² for the left ventricle [p < 0.001] and 177.2 ± 39.5 mL/m² vs. 161.7 ± 33.1 mL/m² for the right ventricle [p < 0.001], respectively). The mean differences between CT and MRI were smaller for the indexed ES volumes (2.0-2.5 mL/m²) than for the indexed ED volumes (6.3-15.5 mL/m²). CT overestimated the stroke volumes by 14-16%. With phase-contrast MRI as a reference, CT (7.2-14.3 mL/m²) showed greater mean differences in the indexed stroke volumes than did MRI (0.8-3.3 mL/m²; p < 0.005). Conclusion: Compared to 2D MRI, CT ventricular volumetry using semiautomatic 3D threshold-based segmentation provides comparable ES volumes, but overestimates the ED and stroke volumes in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.63-73
• /
• 2009

배경: 두개강내 용적에 대한 수동과 자동 측정법이 여성 주요 우울증 환자의 해마의 용적측정술과 modulated voxel-based morphometry (mVBM)의 결과에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 한다. 방법: 21명의 여성 주요 우울증 환자와 성별, 나이의 분포가 비슷한 20명의 여성 정상인을 연구대상에 포함시켰다. 해마와 두개강내 용적은 수동으로 측정하였고, FreeSurfer 프로그램을 이용하여 두개강내 용적을 자동으로 측정하였다. 또한 회색질과 백색질의 부피도 SPM을 이용하여 자동으로 측정하였다. 결과: 수동으로 측정한 두개강의 용적을 통제변인으로 하여 분석한 통계분석의 결과가 FreeSurfer에 의해 측정된 두개강내 용적이나 뇌실질의 용적을 통제변인으로 한 통계분석의 결과보다 우울증 환자의 해마부피 감소와 mVBM 분석의 국조적 부피감소를 보다 민감하게 보여주었다. 수동적인 방법과 FreeSurfer에 의해 측정된 두개강내 용적은 정상인에서는 차이가 없었지만 (p = 0.696), 우울증 환자의 두개강 부피는 FreeSurfer를 이용해 측정한 두 개강의 부피가 더 작았다 (p = 0.000002). 우울증 환자의 전체 회색질의 부피는 수동으로 측정한 두개강의 용적을 통제변인으로 적용하였을 때 정상인의 회색질의 부피보다 작았고 (p = 0.000002), 해마의 부피도 수동으로 측정한 두 개 강의 부피를 통제변인으로 통계처리를 했을 때는 우울증환자의 해마가 뚜렷한 위축을 보였지만 (오른쪽, p = 0.014; 왼쪽, p = 0.004), 다른 측정법을 통제변인으로 했을 때는 유의하지 않았다 (p > 0.05). mVBM 분석에서는 수동으로 측정한 두개강의 부피를 통제변인으로 사용했을 때만 다중비교교정 후에 유의한 결과를 보였다 (FDR p < 0.05). 결론: 수동적인 방법으로 측정한 두개강의 용적이 FreeSurfer에 의해 자동으로 측정된 두개강의 용적이나 뇌실질의 부피보다 해마용적측정술과 mVBM 의 결과에 있어서 더 효율적으로 우울증이 있는 그룹과 없는 그룹의 차이를 보여주는 것에 민감한 결과를 보였다.

• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제82권5호
• /
• pp.1124-1139
• /
• 2021

치매를 비롯한 퇴행성 신경 질환의 초기 진단에 자기공명영상을 이용한 뇌 위축 평가와 정량적 용적 분석이 중요하다. 뇌 위축의 시각적 평가는 주관적으로 평가자에 따라 다른 결과를 보여주기 때문에, 객관적인 결과를 제공하면서 임상 적용도 가능한 소프트웨어의 수요와 개발이 늘어나고 있다. 이러한 임상용 소프트웨어의 실제 임상 적용은 영상 검사의 표준화가 선행되어야 하고, 개발된 소프트웨어의 검증이 반드시 필요하다. 따라서 대한신경두경부영상의학회는 뇌용적 분석 임상용 소프트웨어의 임상적 활용에 대한 의견을 제시하기 위해 전문위원회를 구성하고 현재까지 발표된 연구를 정리하였다. 그리고, 정량화 분석을 위한 영상 검사의 표준화 및 소프트웨어의 임상 적용에 대한 전문가 의견을 제시하기 위하여 공동 작업을 수행하였다. 본 종설에서는 뇌 자기공명영상의 정량화 분석의 필요성 및 배경, 정량화 분석을 위한 임상용 소프트웨어의 소개 및 기존의 표준품(reference standard)과의 진단능 비교, 영상 획득의 표준화, 분석 및 평가의 표준화, 소프트웨어의 임상 적용에 대한 전문가 의견, 제한점 및 대처 방법 등 대한신경두경부영상의학회의 전문가 권고안을 소개하는 것이 목적이다.

• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제84권5호
• /
• pp.1091-1093
• /
• 2023

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제30권2호
• /
• pp.70-77
• /
• 2012

Purpose: To evaluate the patterns of tumor shape and to compare tumor volume derived from simple diameter-based ellipsoid measurement with that derived from tracing the entire tumor contour using region of interest (ROI)-based 3D volumetry with respect to the prediction outcome in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 98 patients with cervical cancer (stage IB-IIIB). The tumor shape was classified into two categories: ellipsoid and non-ellipsoid shape. ROI-based volumetry was derived from each magnetic resonance slice on the work station. For the diameter-based surrogate "ellipsoid volume," the three orthogonal diameters were measured to calculate volume as an ellipsoid. Results: The more than half of tumor (55.1%) had a non-ellipsoid configuration. The predictions for outcome were consistent between two volume groups, with overall survival of 93.6% and 87.7% for small tumor (<20 mL), 62.9% and 69.1% for intermediate-size tumor (20-39 mL), and 14.5% and 16.7% for large tumors (${\geq}$40 mL) using ROI and diameter based measurement, respectively. Disease-free survival was 93.8% and 90.6% for small tumor, 54.3% and 62.7% for intermediate-size tumor, and 13.7% and 10.3% for large tumor using ROI and diameter based method, respectively. Differences in outcome between size groups were statistically significant, and the differences in outcome predicted by the tumor volume by two different methods. Conclusion: Our data suggested that large numbers of cervical cancers are not ellipsoid. However, simple diameter-based tumor volume measurement appears to be useful in comparison with ROI-based volumetry for predicting outcome in cervical cancer patients.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제50권2호
• /
• pp.71-77
• /
• 2017

Background: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has emerged as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for ventricular volumetry. However, the clinical use of cardiac CT requires external validation. Methods: Both cardiac CT and MRI were performed prior to pulmonary valve implantation (PVI) in 11 patients (median age, 19 years) who had undergone total correction of tetralogy of Fallot during infancy. The simplified contouring method (MRI) and semiautomatic 3-dimensional region-growing method (CT) were used to measure ventricular volumes. Results: All volumetric indices measured by CT and MRI generally correlated well with each other, except for the left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LV-ESVI), which showed the following correlations with the other indices: the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RV-EDVI) (r=0.88, p<0.001), the right ventricular end-systolic volume index (RV-ESVI) (r=0.84, p=0.001), the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LV-EDVI) (r=0.90, p=0.001), and the LV-ESVI (r=0.55, p=0.079). While the EDVIs measured by CT were significantly larger than those measured by MRI (median RV-EDVI: $197mL/m^2$ vs. $175mL/m^2$, p=0.008; median LV-EDVI: $94mL/m^2$ vs. $92mL/m^2$, p=0.026), no significant differences were found for the RV-ESVI or LV-ESVI. Conclusion: The EDVIs measured by cardiac CT were greater than those measured by MRI, whereas the ESVIs measured by CT and MRI were comparable. The volumetric characteristics of these 2 diagnostic modalities should be taken into account when indications for late PVI after tetralogy of Fallot repair are assessed.

• Korean Journal of Radiology
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.405-414
• /
• 2021

Objective: To compare two clinically available MR volumetry software, NeuroQuant^® (NQ) and Inbrain^® (IB), and examine the inter-method reliabilities and differences between them. Materials and Methods: This study included 172 subjects (age range, 55-88 years; mean age, 71.2 years), comprising 45 normal healthy subjects, 85 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 42 patients with Alzheimer's disease. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were analyzed with IB and NQ. Mean differences were compared with the paired t test. Inter-method reliability was evaluated with Pearson's correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Effect sizes were also obtained to document the standardized mean differences. Results: The paired t test showed significant volume differences in most regions except for the amygdala between the two methods. Nevertheless, inter-method measurements between IB and NQ showed good to excellent reliability (0.72 < r < 0.96, 0.83 < ICC < 0.98) except for the pallidum, which showed poor reliability (left: r = 0.03, ICC = 0.06; right: r = -0.05, ICC = -0.09). For the measurements of effect size, volume differences were large in most regions (0.05 < r < 6.15). The effect size was the largest in the pallidum and smallest in the cerebellum. Conclusion: Comparisons between IB and NQ showed significantly different volume measurements with large effect sizes. However, they showed good to excellent inter-method reliability in volumetric measurements for all brain regions, with the exception of the pallidum. Clinicians using these commercial software should take into consideration that different volume measurements could be obtained depending on the software used.