DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Predicted Postoperative Lung Function in Pneumonectomy Using Computed Tomography and Lung Perfusion Scans

  • Kang, Hee Joon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seok Soo (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2021.07.22
  • Accepted : 2021.10.08
  • Published : 2021.12.05

Abstract

Background: Predicting postoperative lung function after pneumonectomy is essential. We retrospectively compared postoperative lung function to predicted postoperative lung function based on computed tomography (CT) volumetry and perfusion scintigraphy in patients who underwent pneumonectomy. Methods: Predicted postoperative lung function was calculated based on perfusion scintigraphy and CT volumetry. The predicted function was compared to the postoperative lung function in terms of forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), using 4 parameters: FVC, FVC%, FEV1, and FEV1%. Results: The correlations between postoperative function and predicted function based on CT volumetry were r=0.632 (p=0.003) for FVC% and r=0.728 (p<0.001) for FEV1%. The correlations between postoperative function and predicted postoperative function based on perfusion scintigraphy were r=0.654 (p=0.002) for FVC% and r=0.758 (p<0.001) for FEV1%. The preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores were significantly higher in the group in which the gap between postoperative FEV1 and predicted postoperative FEV1 analyzed by CT was smaller than the gap analyzed by perfusion scintigraphy (1.2±0.62 vs. 0.4±0.52, p=0.006). Conclusion: This study affirms that CT volumetry can replace perfusion scintigraphy for preoperative evaluation of patients needing pneumonectomy. In particular, it was found to be a better predictor of postoperative lung function for poor-performance patients (i.e., those with high ECOG scores).

Keywords

References

  1. Luzzi L, Tenconi S, Voltolini L, et al. Long-term respiratory functional results after pneumonectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:164-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.064
  2. Smulders SA, Smeenk FW, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Postmus PE. Actual and predicted postoperative changes in lung function after pneumonectomy: a retrospective analysis. Chest 2004;125:1735-41. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.125.5.1735
  3. Fernandez-Rodriguez L, Torres I, Romera D, et al. Prediction of postoperative lung function after major lung resection for lung cancer using volumetric computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;156:2297-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.040
  4. Wu MT, Chang JM, Chiang AA, et al. Use of quantitative CT to predict postoperative lung function in patients with lung cancer. Radiology 1994;191:257-62. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134584
  5. Bolliger CT, Guckel C, Engel H, et al. Prediction of functional reserves after lung resection: comparison between quantitative computed tomography, scintigraphy, and anatomy. Respiration 2002;69:482-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066474
  6. Ueda K, Tanaka T, Li TS, Tanaka N, Hamano K. Quantitative computed tomography for the prediction of pulmonary function after lung cancer surgery: a simple method using simulation software. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:414-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.04.015
  7. Lamers RJ, Thelissen GR, Kessels AG, Wouters EF, van Engelshoven JM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation with spirometrically controlled CT lung densitometry. Radiology 1994;193:109-13. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090878
  8. Kinsella M, Muller NL, Abboud RT, Morrison NJ, DyBuncio A. Quantitation of emphysema by computed tomography using a "density mask" program and correlation with pulmonary function tests. Chest 1990;97:315-21. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.97.2.315
  9. Petersson J, Sanchez-Crespo A, Rohdin M, et al. Physiological evaluation of a new quantitative SPECT method measuring regional ventilation and perfusion. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2004;96:1127-36. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00092.2003